Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert E. Wiegand

dblp:77/8767 · also Robert Wiegand · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
metamorphic testing
0.212015
Metamorphic Model-Based Testing Applied on NASA DAT - An Experience Report · ICSE (2) 2015
Software testing
model-based testing
0.212015
Metamorphic Model-Based Testing Applied on NASA DAT - An Experience Report · ICSE (2) 2015
Software testing
test input generation
0.212015
Metamorphic Model-Based Testing Applied on NASA DAT - An Experience Report · ICSE (2) 2015
Software testing › software testing evaluation
test result analysis
0.112015
Metamorphic Model-Based Testing Applied on NASA DAT - An Experience Report · ICSE (2) 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

metamorphic relations · 0.2equivalence of queries · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Metamorphic Model-Based Testing Applied on NASA DAT - An Experience Report
abstract
Testing is necessary for all types of systems, but becomes difficult when the tester cannot easily determine whether the system delivers the correct result or not. NASA's Data Access Toolkit allows NASA analysts to query a large database of telemetry data. Since the user is unfamiliar with the data and several data transformations can occur, it is impossible to determine whether the system behaves correctly or not in full scale production situations. Small scale testing was already conducted manually by other teams and unit testing was conducted on individual functions. However, there was still a need for full scale acceptance testing on a broad scale. We describe how we addressed this testing problem by applying the idea of metamorphic testing [1]. Specifically, we base it on equivalence of queries and by using the system itself for testing. The approach is implemented using a model-based testing approach in combination with a test data generation and test case outcome analysis strategy. We also discuss some of the issues that were detected using this approach.
Mikael Lindvall, Dharmalingam Ganesan, Ragnar Ardal, Robert E. Wiegand
ICSE (2)4
2015 Model generation to support model-based testing applied on the NASA DAT Web-application - An experience report
abstract
Model-based Testing (MBT), where a model of the system under test's (SUT) behavior is used to automatically generate executable test cases, is a promising and versatile testing technology. Nevertheless, adoption of MBT technologies in industry is slow and many testing tasks are performed via manually created executable test cases (i.e. test programs such as JUnit). In order to adopt MBT, testers must learn how to construct models and use these models to generate test cases, which might be a hurdle. An interesting observation in our previous work is that the existing manually created test cases often provided invaluable insights for the manual creation of the testing models of the system. In this paper we present an approach that allows the tester to first create and debug a set of test cases. When the tester is happy with the test cases, the next step is to automatically generate a model from the test cases. The generated model is derived from the test cases, which are actions that the system can perform (e.g. a button clicks) and their expected outputs in form of assert statements (e.g. assert data entered). The model is a Finite State Machine (FSM) model that can be employed with little or no manual changes to generate additional test cases for the SUT. We successfully applied the approach in a feasibility study to the NASA Data Access Toolkit (DaT), which is a web-based GUI. One compelling finding is that the test cases that were generated from the automatically generated models were able to detect issues that were not detected by the original set of manually created test cases. We present the findings from the case study and discuss best practices for incorporating model generation techniques into an existing testing process.
Christoph Schulze 0001, Mikael Lindvall, Sigurthor Bjorgvinsson, Robert E. Wiegand
ISSRE4