Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Srihari Venkatesan

dblp:77/981 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 41% Information retrieval · 30% Query processing and optimization · 26%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
clustering
0.212014
Scalable K-Means by ranked retrieval · WSDM 2014
Data mining › clustering
k-means clustering
0.212014
Scalable K-Means by ranked retrieval · WSDM 2014
Information retrieval › retrieval models
ranked retrieval
0.212014
Scalable K-Means by ranked retrieval · WSDM 2014
Information retrieval › indexing
inverted index
0.112011
Evaluation Strategies for Top-k Queries over Memory-Resident Inverted Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011
Query processing and optimization
top-k query processing
0.112011
Evaluation Strategies for Top-k Queries over Memory-Resident Inverted Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011
Query processing and optimization › pattern matching query
boolean expression matching
0.112010
Efficiently evaluating complex boolean expressions · SIGMOD Conference 2010
Data mining › clustering
large-scale clustering
0.112014
Scalable K-Means by ranked retrieval · WSDM 2014
Query processing and optimization
query execution
0.012011
Evaluation Strategies for Top-k Queries over Memory-Resident Inverted Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ranked retrieval techniques · 0.2heuristics · 0.2interval mapping · 0.1bottom-up evaluation · 0.1Dewey IDs · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Scalable K-Means by ranked retrieval
abstract
The k-means clustering algorithm has a long history and a proven practical performance, however it does not scale to clustering millions of data points into thousands of clusters in high dimensional spaces. The main computational bottleneck is the need to recompute the nearest centroid for every data point at every iteration, aprohibitive cost when the number of clusters is large. In this paper we show how to reduce the cost of the k-means algorithm by large factors by adapting ranked retrieval techniques. Using a combination of heuristics, on two real life data sets the wall clock time per iteration is reduced from 445 minutes to less than 4, and from 705 minutes to 1.4, while the clustering quality remains within 0.5% of the k-means quality.
Andrei Z. Broder, Lluís Garcia Pueyo, Vanja Josifovski, Sergei Vassilvitskii, Srihari Venkatesan
WSDM5
2011 Evaluation Strategies for Top-k Queries over Memory-Resident Inverted Indexes
Marcus Fontoura, Vanja Josifovski, Srihari Venkatesan, Xiangfei Zhu, Jason Y. Zien
Proc. VLDB Endow.4
2010 Efficiently evaluating complex boolean expressions
abstract
The problem of efficiently evaluating a large collection of complex Boolean expressions - beyond simple conjunctions and Disjunctive/Conjunctive Normal Forms (DNF/CNF) - occurs in many emerging online advertising applications such as advertising exchanges and automatic targeting. The simple solution of normalizing complex Boolean expressions to DNF or CNF form, and then using existing methods for evaluating such expressions is not always effective because of the exponential blow-up in the size of expressions due to normalization. We thus propose a novel method for evaluating complex expressions, which leverages existing techniques for evaluating leaf-level conjunctions, and then uses a bottom-up evaluation technique to only process the relevant parts of the complex expressions that contain the matching conjunctions. We develop two such bottom-up evaluation techniques, one based on Dewey IDs and another based on mapping Boolean expressions to one-dimensional intervals. Our experimental evaluation based on data obtained from an online advertising exchange shows that the proposed techniques are efficient and scalable, both with respect to space usage as well as evaluation time.
Marcus Fontoura, Suhas Sadanandan, Jayavel Shanmugasundaram, Sergei Vassilvitskii, Erik Vee, Srihari Venkatesan, Jason Y. Zien
SIGMOD Conference6