EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Srihari Venkatesan
dblp:77/981
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 41% Information retrieval · 30% Query processing and optimization · 26% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Scalable K-Means by ranked retrieval · WSDM 2014 |
Data mining › clustering
k-means clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Scalable K-Means by ranked retrieval · WSDM 2014 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
ranked retrieval |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Scalable K-Means by ranked retrieval · WSDM 2014 |
Information retrieval › indexing
inverted index |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Evaluation Strategies for Top-k Queries over Memory-Resident Inverted Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011 |
Query processing and optimization
top-k query processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Evaluation Strategies for Top-k Queries over Memory-Resident Inverted Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011 |
Query processing and optimization › pattern matching query
boolean expression matching |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Efficiently evaluating complex boolean expressions · SIGMOD Conference 2010 |
Data mining › clustering
large-scale clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Scalable K-Means by ranked retrieval · WSDM 2014 |
Query processing and optimization
query execution |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Evaluation Strategies for Top-k Queries over Memory-Resident Inverted Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ranked retrieval techniques · 0.2heuristics · 0.2interval mapping · 0.1bottom-up evaluation · 0.1Dewey IDs · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Scalable K-Means by ranked retrievalabstractThe k-means clustering algorithm has a long history and a proven practical performance, however it does not scale to clustering millions of data points into thousands of clusters in high dimensional spaces. The main computational bottleneck is the need to recompute the nearest centroid for every data point at every iteration, aprohibitive cost when the number of clusters is large. In this paper we show how to reduce the cost of the k-means algorithm by large factors by adapting ranked retrieval techniques. Using a combination of heuristics, on two real life data sets the wall clock time per iteration is reduced from 445 minutes to less than 4, and from 705 minutes to 1.4, while the clustering quality remains within 0.5% of the k-means quality. Andrei Z. Broder, Lluís Garcia Pueyo, Vanja Josifovski, Sergei Vassilvitskii, Srihari Venkatesan |
WSDM | 5 |
| 2011 | Evaluation Strategies for Top-k Queries over Memory-Resident Inverted Indexes
Marcus Fontoura, Vanja Josifovski, Srihari Venkatesan, Xiangfei Zhu, Jason Y. Zien |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 4 |
| 2010 | Efficiently evaluating complex boolean expressionsabstractThe problem of efficiently evaluating a large collection of complex Boolean expressions - beyond simple conjunctions and Disjunctive/Conjunctive Normal Forms (DNF/CNF) - occurs in many emerging online advertising applications such as advertising exchanges and automatic targeting. The simple solution of normalizing complex Boolean expressions to DNF or CNF form, and then using existing methods for evaluating such expressions is not always effective because of the exponential blow-up in the size of expressions due to normalization. We thus propose a novel method for evaluating complex expressions, which leverages existing techniques for evaluating leaf-level conjunctions, and then uses a bottom-up evaluation technique to only process the relevant parts of the complex expressions that contain the matching conjunctions. We develop two such bottom-up evaluation techniques, one based on Dewey IDs and another based on mapping Boolean expressions to one-dimensional intervals. Our experimental evaluation based on data obtained from an online advertising exchange shows that the proposed techniques are efficient and scalable, both with respect to space usage as well as evaluation time. Marcus Fontoura, Suhas Sadanandan, Jayavel Shanmugasundaram, Sergei Vassilvitskii, Erik Vee, Srihari Venkatesan, Jason Y. Zien |
SIGMOD Conference | 6 |