Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Guta

dblp:77/9877 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Machine translation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
reordering model
0.212015
A Comparison between Count and Neural Network Models Based on Joint Translation and Reordering Sequences · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.212015
A Comparison between Count and Neural Network Models Based on Joint Translation and Reordering Sequences · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment
0.212015
A Comparison between Count and Neural Network Models Based on Joint Translation and Reordering Sequences · EMNLP 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recurrent neural network · 0.2n-gram model · 0.2kneser-ney smoothing · 0.2feedforward neural network · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 A Comparison between Count and Neural Network Models Based on Joint Translation and Reordering Sequences
abstract
We propose a conversion of bilingual sentence pairs and the corresponding word alignments into novel linear sequences.These are joint translation and reordering (JTR) uniquely defined sequences, combining interdepending lexical and alignment dependencies on the word level into a single framework.They are constructed in a simple manner while capturing multiple alignments and empty words.JTR sequences can be used to train a variety of models.We investigate the performances of ngram models with modified Kneser-Ney smoothing, feed-forward and recurrent neural network architectures when estimated on JTR sequences, and compare them to the operation sequence model (Durrani et al., 2013b).Evaluations on the IWSLT German→English, WMT German→English and BOLT Chinese→English tasks show that JTR models improve state-of-the-art phrasebased systems by up to 2.2 BLEU.
Andreas Guta, Tamer Alkhouli, Jan-Thorsten Peter, Jörn Wübker, Hermann Ney
EMNLP1
2011 Incorporating alignments into Conditional Random Fields for grapheme to phoneme conversion
abstract
Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) are a state-of-the-art approach to natural language processing tasks like grapheme-to phoneme (g2p) conversion which is used to produce pronunciations or pronunciation variants for almost all ASR pronunciation lexica. One drawback of CRFs is that for training, an alignment is needed between graphemes and phonemes, usually even 1-to-l. The quality of the g2p result heavily depends on this alignment. Since these alignments are usually not annotated within the corpora, external models have to be used to produce such an alignment in a preprocessing step. In this work, we propose two approaches to integrate the alignment generation directly and efficiently into the CRF training process. Whereas the first approach relies on linear segmentation as starting point, the second approach considers all possible alignments given certain constraints. Both methods have been evaluated on two English g2p tasks, namely NETtalk and Celex, on which state-of-the-art results have been reported in the literature. The proposed approaches lead to results comparable to the state-of-the art.
Patrick Lehnen, Stefan Hahn, Andreas Guta, Hermann Ney
ICASSP3