Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Asma Maalej
dblp:78/108
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
equivalence checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
sequential equivalence checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008 |
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential equivalence checking · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flowsabstractIt has long been the practice to create models in C or C++ for architectural studies, software prototyping and RTL verification in the design of Systems-on-Chip (SoC). It is often the case that by the end of a design project, multiple C models exist for different uses. Since a lot of time is invested in ensuring the functional correctness of these models via their use in system-level simulations, they often become "golden" functional reference models. Design teams are moving towards leveraging these system-level models to reduce the time needed for design and verification of RTL. On the design side, the use of high-level synthesis tools to synthesize RTL from C/C++ models is gaining ground for certain classes of blocks within a design. On the verification front, temporal differences at interfaces and in internal states between system-level models and RTL prevent the use of combinational equivalence checkers. This paper focuses on the use of sequential equivalence checking to verify functional equivalence between system-level models and RTL and describes the challenges and vale of using it in system-level to RTL flows. Pascal Urard, Asma Maalej, Roberto Guizzetti, Nitin Chawla |
DAC | 2 |