Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Asma Maalej

dblp:78/108 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
equivalence checking
0.112008
Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.112008
Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
sequential equivalence checking
0.112008
Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis
0.012008
Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows · DAC 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequential equivalence checking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Leveraging sequential equivalence checking to enable system-level to RTL flows
abstract
It has long been the practice to create models in C or C++ for architectural studies, software prototyping and RTL verification in the design of Systems-on-Chip (SoC). It is often the case that by the end of a design project, multiple C models exist for different uses. Since a lot of time is invested in ensuring the functional correctness of these models via their use in system-level simulations, they often become "golden" functional reference models. Design teams are moving towards leveraging these system-level models to reduce the time needed for design and verification of RTL. On the design side, the use of high-level synthesis tools to synthesize RTL from C/C++ models is gaining ground for certain classes of blocks within a design. On the verification front, temporal differences at interfaces and in internal states between system-level models and RTL prevent the use of combinational equivalence checkers. This paper focuses on the use of sequential equivalence checking to verify functional equivalence between system-level models and RTL and describes the challenges and vale of using it in system-level to RTL flows.
Pascal Urard, Asma Maalej, Roberto Guizzetti, Nitin Chawla
DAC2