Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jamel Gafsi
dblp:78/1351
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 61% Distributed systems · 30% Performance modeling and evaluation · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › reliability analysis
disk array reliability |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Modeling and Performance Comparison of Reliability Strategies for Distributed Video Servers · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2000 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Modeling and Performance Comparison of Reliability Strategies for Distributed Video Servers · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2000 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
redundancy |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Modeling and Performance Comparison of Reliability Strategies for Distributed Video Servers · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
continuous-time markov chain · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Modeling and Performance Comparison of Reliability Strategies for Distributed Video ServersabstractLarge scale video servers are typically based on disk arrays that comprise multiple nodes and many hard disks. Due to the large number of components, disk arrays are susceptible to disk and node failures that can affect the server reliability. Therefore, fault tolerance must be already addressed in the design of the video server. For fault tolerance, we consider parity-based as well as mirroring-based techniques with various distribution granularities of the redundant data. We identify several reliability schemes and compare them in terms of the server reliability and per stream cost. To compute the server reliability, we use continuous time Markov chains that are evaluated using the SHARPE software package. Our study covers independent disk failures and dependent component failures. We propose a new mirroring scheme called Grouped One-to-One scheme that achieves the highest reliability among all schemes considered. The results of this paper indicate that dividing the server into independent groups achieves the best compromise between the server reliability and the cost per stream. We further find that the smaller the group size, the better the trade-off between a high server reliability and a low per stream cost. Jamel Gafsi, Ernst W. Biersack |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 1 |