Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jamel Gafsi

dblp:78/1351 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 61% Distributed systems · 30% Performance modeling and evaluation · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › reliability analysis
disk array reliability
0.012000
Modeling and Performance Comparison of Reliability Strategies for Distributed Video Servers · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2000
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.012000
Modeling and Performance Comparison of Reliability Strategies for Distributed Video Servers · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2000
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
redundancy
0.012000
Modeling and Performance Comparison of Reliability Strategies for Distributed Video Servers · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

continuous-time markov chain · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Modeling and Performance Comparison of Reliability Strategies for Distributed Video Servers
abstract
Large scale video servers are typically based on disk arrays that comprise multiple nodes and many hard disks. Due to the large number of components, disk arrays are susceptible to disk and node failures that can affect the server reliability. Therefore, fault tolerance must be already addressed in the design of the video server. For fault tolerance, we consider parity-based as well as mirroring-based techniques with various distribution granularities of the redundant data. We identify several reliability schemes and compare them in terms of the server reliability and per stream cost. To compute the server reliability, we use continuous time Markov chains that are evaluated using the SHARPE software package. Our study covers independent disk failures and dependent component failures. We propose a new mirroring scheme called Grouped One-to-One scheme that achieves the highest reliability among all schemes considered. The results of this paper indicate that dividing the server into independent groups achieves the best compromise between the server reliability and the cost per stream. We further find that the smaller the group size, the better the trade-off between a high server reliability and a low per stream cost.
Jamel Gafsi, Ernst W. Biersack
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1