EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kalyan Moy Gupta
dblp:78/2386
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-3311-0030ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data integration and cleaning
data mapping |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | IMT: A Mixed-Initiative Data Mapping and Search Toolkit · AAAI 2008 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › node classification
collective classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Cautious Inference in Collective Classification · AAAI 2007 |
Human-AI interaction
mixed-initiative interaction |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | IMT: A Mixed-Initiative Data Mapping and Search Toolkit · AAAI 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixed-initiative interaction · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | NOD-CC: A Hybrid CBR-CNN Architecture for Novel Object Discovery
J. T. Turner, Michael W. Floyd, Kalyan Moy Gupta, Tim Oates 0001 |
ICCBR | 3 |
| 2018 | Novel Object Discovery Using Case-Based Reasoning and Convolutional Neural Networks
J. T. Turner, Michael W. Floyd, Kalyan Moy Gupta, David W. Aha |
ICCBR | 3 |
| 2014 | Case-Based Object Placement Planning
Kellen Gillespie, Kalyan Moy Gupta, Michael Drinkwater |
ICCBR | 2 |
| 2009 | Case-Based Collective Inference for Maritime Object Classification
Kalyan Moy Gupta, David W. Aha, Philip Moore 0002 |
ICCBR | 1 |
| 2009 | Cautious Collective Classification
Luke K. McDowell, Kalyan Moy Gupta, David W. Aha |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2008 | Enabling the Interoperability of Large-Scale Legacy Systems
Kalyan Moy Gupta, Michael Zang, Adam Gray, David W. Aha, Joe Kriege |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2008 | IMT: A Mixed-Initiative Data Mapping and Search Toolkit
Michael Zang, Adam Gray, Joe Kriege, Kalyan Moy Gupta, David W. Aha |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2008 | Soft computing techniques for web services brokering
Roy Ladner, Fred Petry, Kalyan Moy Gupta, Elizabeth Warner, Philip Moore 0002, David W. Aha |
Soft Comput. | 3 |
| 2007 | Cautious Inference in Collective Classification
Luke K. McDowell, Kalyan Moy Gupta, David W. Aha |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2001 | Taxonomic Conversational Case-Based Reasoning
Kalyan Moy Gupta |
ICCBR | 1 |
| 2001 | Bridging the Lesson Distribution Gap
David W. Aha, Rosina O. Weber, Hector Muñoz-Avila, Len Breslow, Kalyan Moy Gupta |
IJCAI | 5 |
| 1997 | A connectionist approach for similarity assessment in case-based reasoning systems
Kalyan Moy Gupta, Ali R. Montazemi |
Decis. Support Syst. | 1 |
| 1997 | Empirical evaluation of retrieval in case-based reasoning systems using modified cosine matching functionabstractCase-based reasoning (CBR) supports ill-structured decision making by retrieving previous cases that are useful toward the solution of a new decision problem. The usefulness of previous cases is determined by assessing the similarity of a new case with the previous cases. In this paper, we present a modified form of the cosine matching function that makes it possible to contrast the two cases being matched and to include differences in the importance of features in the new case and the importance of features in the previous case. Our empirical evaluation of a CBR application to a diagnosis and repair task in an electromechanical domain shows that the proposed modified cosine matching function has a superior retrieval performance when compared to the performance of nearest-neighbor and the Tversky's contrast matching functions. Kalyan Moy Gupta, Ali R. Montazemi |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A | 1 |