Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Niranjay Ravindran
dblp:78/2520
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 4 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Physical-layer communications · 96% Cellular and mobile networks · 4% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications › channel state information › channel state information feedback
limited feedback |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Multiuser MIMO achievable rates with downlink training and channel state · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010 Limited feedback-based block diagonalization for the MIMO broadcast channel · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2008 |
Physical-layer communications
MIMO |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Multiuser MIMO achievable rates with downlink training and channel state · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010 Limited feedback-based block diagonalization for the MIMO broadcast channel · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2008 |
Physical-layer communications
channel state information |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Multiuser MIMO achievable rates with downlink training and channel state · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010 |
Physical-layer communications › MIMO
multiuser MIMO |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Multiuser MIMO achievable rates with downlink training and channel state · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010 |
Physical-layer communications › channel state information
channel quantization |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Limited feedback-based block diagonalization for the MIMO broadcast channel · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2008 |
Physical-layer communications › multiple-antenna systems
multiuser MIMO broadcast channel |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Limited feedback-based block diagonalization for the MIMO broadcast channel · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2008 |
Physical-layer communications › MIMO › multiuser MIMO
broadcast channel |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Multiuser MIMO achievable rates with downlink training and channel state · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010 |
Cellular and mobile networks
downlink transmission |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Multiuser MIMO achievable rates with downlink training and channel state · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010 |
Physical-layer communications › beamforming › linear beamforming
block diagonalization |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Limited feedback-based block diagonalization for the MIMO broadcast channel · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2008 |
Physical-layer communications › MIMO
precoding |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Limited feedback-based block diagonalization for the MIMO broadcast channel · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantized feedback · 0.1doppler analysis · 0.1analog feedback · 0.1rate-loss analysis · 0.1random vector quantization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | SPLATT: Efficient and Parallel Sparse Tensor-Matrix MultiplicationabstractMulti-dimensional arrays, or tensors, are increasingly found in fields such as signal processing and recommender systems. Real-world tensors can be enormous in size and often very sparse. There is a need for efficient, high-performance tools capable of processing the massive sparse tensors of today and the future. This paper introduces SPLATT, a C library with shared-memory parallelism for three-mode tensors. SPLATT contains algorithmic improvements over competing state of the art tools for sparse tensor factorization. SPLATT has a fast, parallel method of multiplying a matricide tensor by a Khatri-Rao product, which is a key kernel in tensor factorization methods. SPLATT uses a novel data structure that exploits the sparsity patterns of tensors. This data structure has a small memory footprint similar to competing methods and allows for the computational improvements featured in our work. We also present a method of finding cache-friendly reordering and utilizing them with a novel form of cache tiling. To our knowledge, this is the first work to investigate reordering and cache tiling in this context. SPLATT averages almost 30x speedup compared to our baseline when using 16 threads and reaches over 80x speedup on NELL-2. Shaden Smith, Niranjay Ravindran, Nicholas D. Sidiropoulos, George Karypis |
IPDPS | 2 |
| 2012 | Multi-User Diversity vs. Accurate Channel State Information in MIMO Downlink ChannelsabstractIn a multiple transmit antenna, single antenna per receiver downlink channel with limited channel state feedback, we consider the following question: given a constraint on the total system-wide feedback load, is it preferable to get low-rate/coarse channel feedback from a large number of receivers or high-rate/high-quality feedback from a smaller number of receivers? Acquiring feedback from many receivers allows multi-user diversity to be exploited, while high-rate feedback allows for very precise selection of beamforming directions. We show that there is a strong preference for obtaining high-quality feedback, and that obtaining near-perfect channel information from as many receivers as possible provides a significantly larger sum rate than collecting a few feedback bits from a large number of users. In terms of system design, this corresponds to a preference for acquiring high-quality feedback from a few users on each time-frequency resource block, as opposed to coarse feedback from many users on each block. Niranjay Ravindran, Nihar Jindal |
IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. | 1 |
| 2010 | Multiuser MIMO achievable rates with downlink training and channel stateabstractIn this paper, we consider a multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) fading broadcast channel and compute achievable ergodic rates when channel state information (CSI) is acquired at the receivers via downlink training and it is provided to the transmitter by channel state feedback. Unquantized (analog) and quantized (digital) channel state feedback schemes are analyzed and compared under various assumptions. Digital feedback is shown to be potentially superior when the feedback channel uses per channel state coefficient is larger than 1. Also, we show that by proper design of the digital feedback link, errors in the feedback have a minor effect even if simple uncoded modulation is used on the feedback channel. We discuss first the case of an unfaded additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) feedback channel with orthogonal access and then the case of fading MIMO multiple access (MIMO-MAC). We show that by exploiting the MIMO-MAC nature of the uplink channel, a much better scaling of the feedback channel resource with the number of base station (BS) antennas can be achieved. Finally, for the case of delayed feedback, we show that in the realistic case where the fading process has (normalized) maximum Doppler frequency shift 0 ¿ F < 1/2, a fraction 1 - 2F of the optimal multiplexing gain is achievable. The general conclusion of this work is that very significant downlink throughput is achievable with simple and efficient channel state feedback, provided that the feedback link is properly designed. Giuseppe Caire, Nihar Jindal, Mari Kobayashi, Niranjay Ravindran |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 4 |
| 2008 | Multi-User Diversity vs. Accurate Channel Feedback for MIMO Broadcast ChannelsabstractA multiple transmit antenna, single receive antenna (per receiver) downlink channel with limited channel feedback is considered. Given a constraint on the total system-wide channel feedback, the following question is considered: is it preferable to get low-rate feedback from a large number of receivers or to receive high-rate/high-quality feedback from a smaller number of (randomly selected) receivers? Acquiring feedback from many users allows multi-user diversity to be exploited, while high- rate feedback allows for very precise selection of beamforming directions. It is shown that systems in which a limited number of users feedback high-rate channel information significantly outperform low-rate/many user systems. While capacity increases only double logarithmically with the number of users, the marginal benefit of channel feedback is very significant up to the point where the CSI is essentially perfect. Niranjay Ravindran, Nihar Jindal |
ICC | 1 |
| 2008 | Limited feedback-based block diagonalization for the MIMO broadcast channelabstractBlock diagonalization is a linear preceding technique for the multiple antenna broadcast (downlink) channel that involves transmission of multiple data streams to each receiver such that no multi-user interference is experienced at any of the receivers. This low-complexity scheme operates only a few dB away from capacity but requires very accurate channel knowledge at the transmitter. We consider a limited feedback system where each receiver knows its channel perfectly, but the transmitter is only provided with a finite number of channel feedback bits from each receiver. Using a random quantization argument, we quantify the throughput loss due to imperfect channel knowledge as a function of the feedback level. The quality of channel knowledge must improve proportional to the SNR in order to prevent interference-limitations, and we show that scaling the number of feedback bits linearly with the system SNR is sufficient to maintain a bounded rate loss. Finally, we compare our quantization strategy to an analog feedback scheme and show the superiority of quantized feedback. Niranjay Ravindran, Nihar Jindal |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 1 |
| 2007 | Beamforming with Finite Rate Feedback for LOS MIMO Downlink ChannelsabstractWe consider a MIMO line of sight (LOS) broadcast channel where each user has perfect knowledge of its own channel and feeds back 'quantized' channel information to the transmitter with finite number of bits. The rate loss incurred due to imperfect channel information at the transmitter is quantified in terms of the number of feedback bits, assuming that low-complexity zero-forcing beamforming is used by the transmitter. Moreover, in order to maintain a constant rate loss relative to a perfect CSIT system, it is shown that the number of feedback bits per user should grow linearly with the system SNR in dB but only logarithmitcally with the number of transmit antennas. Simulation results comparing zero-forcing, MMSE and conventional beamforming with greedy user selection and finite rate feedback are also presented. Niranjay Ravindran, Nihar Jindal, Howard C. Huang |
GLOBECOM | 1 |
| 2007 | MIMO Broadcast Channels with Block Diagonalization and Finite Rate FeedbackabstractBlock diagonalization is a linear precoding technique for the multiple antenna broadcast (downlink) channel that involves transmission of multiple data streams to each receiver such that no multi-user interference is experienced at any of the receivers. This low-complexity scheme operates only a few dB away from capacity but does require very accurate channel knowledge at the transmitter, which can be very difficult to obtain in fading scenarios. We consider a limited feedback system where each receiver knows its channel perfectly, but the transmitter is only provided with a finite number of channel feedback bits from each receiver. Using a random vector quantization argument, we quantify the throughput loss due to imperfect channel knowledge as a function of the feedback level. The quality of channel knowledge must improve proportional to the SNR in order to prevent interference-limitations, and we show that scaling the number of feedback bits linearly with the system SNR is sufficient to maintain a bounded rate loss. Finally, we investigate a simple scalar quantization scheme that is seen to achieve the same scaling behavior as vector quantization. Niranjay Ravindran, Nihar Jindal |
ICASSP (3) | 1 |
| 2007 | Quantized vs. Analog Feedback for the MIMO Broadcast Channel: A Comparison between Zero-Forcing Based Achievable RatesabstractWe consider a MIMO fading broadcast channel and compare the achievable ergodic rates when the channel state information at the transmitter is provided by "analog" noisy feedback or by quantized (digital) feedback. The superiority of digital feedback is shown, with perfect or imperfect CSIR, whenever the number of feedback channel uses per channel coefficient is larger than 1. Also, we show that by proper design of the digital feedback link, errors in the feedback have a minor effect even by using very simple uncoded modulation. Finally, we show that analog feedback achieves a fraction 1 - 2F of the optimal multiplexing gain even in the presence of a feedback delay, when the fading belongs to the class of "Doppler processes" with normalized maximum Doppler frequency shift 0 les F les 1/2. Giuseppe Caire, Nihar Jindal, Mari Kobayashi, Niranjay Ravindran |
ISIT | 4 |
| 2007 | Achievable Throughput of MIMO Downlink Beamforming with Limited Channel InformationabstractWe consider a MIMO fading broadcast channel and study the achievable throughput of zero-forcing downlink beamforming when the channel state information (CSI) available to the transmitter and/or receivers is imperfect. Each receiver (mobile) acquires imperfect CSI via downlink training pilots, and the transmitter acquires CSI through explicit feedback from each mobile. We analyze both analog and digital (i.e., quantized) channel feedback techniques. Our analysis quantifies the throughput degradation due to limited training, limited feedback resources (measured in feedback channel symbols rather than bits), and errors on the feedback channel. Using these results we are able to quantify scenarios in which digital feedback outperforms analog and also provide guidelines for the optimal allocation of resources to training and channel feedback. Giuseppe Caire, Nihar Jindal, Mari Kobayashi, Niranjay Ravindran |
PIMRC | 4 |