Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas Schäfer 0005
dblp:78/3834-5
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 81% Medical and health informatics · 19% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
cell-type deconvolution |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | HIDE: hierarchical cell-type deconvolution · Bioinform. 2025 Adaptive digital tissue deconvolution · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | HIDE: hierarchical cell-type deconvolution · Bioinform. 2025 Adaptive digital tissue deconvolution · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
spatial omics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SpaCeNet: Spatial Cellular Networks from Omics Data · RECOMB 2024 |
Medical and health informatics
counterfactual estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BITES: balanced individual treatment effect for survival data · Bioinform. 2022 |
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
individual treatment effect estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BITES: balanced individual treatment effect for survival data · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BITES: balanced individual treatment effect for survival data · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptive digital tissue deconvolution · Bioinform. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear combination reconstruction · 0.9hierarchical bayesian modeling · 0.9spatial statistics · 0.8network inference · 0.8machine learning · 0.8constrained optimization · 0.8integral probability metrics · 0.6deep neural network · 0.6cox proportional hazards model · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | HIDE: hierarchical cell-type deconvolutionabstractMOTIVATION: Cell-type deconvolution is a computational approach to infer cellular distributions from bulk transcriptomics data. Several methods have been proposed, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Reference based approaches make use of archetypic transcriptomic profiles representing individual cell types. Those reference profiles are ideally chosen such that the observed bulks can be reconstructed as a linear combination thereof. This strategy, however, ignores the fact that cellular populations arise through the process of cellular differentiation, which entails the gradual emergence of cell groups with diverse morphological and functional characteristics. RESULTS: Here, we propose Hierarchical cell-type Deconvolution (HIDE), a cell-type deconvolution approach which incorporates a cell hierarchy for improved performance and interpretability. This is achieved by a hierarchical procedure that preserves estimates of major cell populations while inferring their respective subpopulations. We show in simulation studies that this procedure produces more reliable and more consistent results than other state-of-the-art approaches. Finally, we provide an example application of HIDE to explore breast cancer specimens from TCGA. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A python implementation of HIDE is available at zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14724906). Dennis Völkl, Malte Mensching-Buhr, Thomas Sterr, Sarah Bolz, Andreas Schäfer 0005, Nicole Seifert, Jana Tauschke, Austin Rayford, Oddbjørn Straume, Helena U. Zacharias, Sushma Nagaraja Grellscheid, Tim Beißbarth, Michael Altenbuchinger, Franziska Görtler |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2025 | FACT: Federated Adaptive Cross TrainingabstractFederated Learning (FL) facilitates distributed model development to aggregate multiple confidential data sources. The information transfer among clients can be compromised by distributional differences, i.e., by non-i.i.d. data. A particularly challenging scenario is the federated model adaptation to a target client without access to annotated data. We propose Federated Adaptive Cross Training (FACT), which uses the implicit domain differences between source clients to identify domain shifts in the target domain. In each round of FL, FACT cross initializes a pair of source clients to generate domain specialized representations which are then used to enforce a domain invariant data representation. We empirically show that FACT outperforms both state-of-the-art federated and non-federated models on three popular multi-source-single-target benchmarks, and achieves highly competitive performance on single-source-single-target experiments. We further study FACT’s behavior with respect to communication restrictions and the number of participating clients. Stefan Schrod, Jonas Lippl, Andreas Schäfer 0005, Michael Altenbuchinger |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 3 |
| 2024 | SpaCeNet: Spatial Cellular Networks from Omics Data
Stefan Schrod, Niklas Lück, Robert Lohmayer, Stefan Solbrig, Tina Wipfler, Katherine H. Shutta, Marouen Ben Guebila, Andreas Schäfer 0005, Tim Beißbarth, Helena U. Zacharias, Peter J. Oefner, John Quackenbush, Michael Altenbuchinger |
RECOMB | 8 |
| 2024 | Adaptive digital tissue deconvolutionabstractMOTIVATION: The inference of cellular compositions from bulk and spatial transcriptomics data increasingly complements data analyses. Multiple computational approaches were suggested and recently, machine learning techniques were developed to systematically improve estimates. Such approaches allow to infer additional, less abundant cell types. However, they rely on training data which do not capture the full biological diversity encountered in transcriptomics analyses; data can contain cellular contributions not seen in the training data and as such, analyses can be biased or blurred. Thus, computational approaches have to deal with unknown, hidden contributions. Moreover, most methods are based on cellular archetypes which serve as a reference; e.g. a generic T-cell profile is used to infer the proportion of T-cells. It is well known that cells adapt their molecular phenotype to the environment and that pre-specified cell archetypes can distort the inference of cellular compositions. RESULTS: We propose Adaptive Digital Tissue Deconvolution (ADTD) to estimate cellular proportions of pre-selected cell types together with possibly unknown and hidden background contributions. Moreover, ADTD adapts prototypic reference profiles to the molecular environment of the cells, which further resolves cell-type specific gene regulation from bulk transcriptomics data. We verify this in simulation studies and demonstrate that ADTD improves existing approaches in estimating cellular compositions. In an application to bulk transcriptomics data from breast cancer patients, we demonstrate that ADTD provides insights into cell-type specific molecular differences between breast cancer subtypes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A python implementation of ADTD and a tutorial are available at Gitlab and zenodo (doi:10.5281/zenodo.7548362). Franziska Görtler, Malte Mensching-Buhr, Ørjan Skaar, Stefan Schrod, Thomas Sterr, Andreas Schäfer 0005, Tim Beißbarth, Anagha Joshi, Helena U. Zacharias, Sushma Nagaraja Grellscheid, Michael Altenbuchinger |
Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2022 | BITES: balanced individual treatment effect for survival dataabstractMOTIVATION: Estimating the effects of interventions on patient outcome is one of the key aspects of personalized medicine. Their inference is often challenged by the fact that the training data comprises only the outcome for the administered treatment, and not for alternative treatments (the so-called counterfactual outcomes). Several methods were suggested for this scenario based on observational data, i.e. data where the intervention was not applied randomly, for both continuous and binary outcome variables. However, patient outcome is often recorded in terms of time-to-event data, comprising right-censored event times if an event does not occur within the observation period. Albeit their enormous importance, time-to-event data are rarely used for treatment optimization. We suggest an approach named BITES (Balanced Individual Treatment Effect for Survival data), which combines a treatment-specific semi-parametric Cox loss with a treatment-balanced deep neural network; i.e. we regularize differences between treated and non-treated patients using Integral Probability Metrics (IPM). RESULTS: We show in simulation studies that this approach outperforms the state of the art. Furthermore, we demonstrate in an application to a cohort of breast cancer patients that hormone treatment can be optimized based on six routine parameters. We successfully validated this finding in an independent cohort. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We provide BITES as an easy-to-use python implementation including scheduled hyper-parameter optimization (https://github.com/sschrod/BITES). The data underlying this article are available in the CRAN repository at https://rdrr.io/cran/survival/man/gbsg.html and https://rdrr.io/cran/survival/man/rotterdam.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Stefan Schrod, Andreas Schäfer 0005, Stefan Solbrig, Robert Lohmayer, Wolfram Gronwald, Peter J. Oefner, Tim Beißbarth, Rainer Spang, Helena U. Zacharias, Michael Altenbuchinger |
Bioinform. | 2 |