Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hakan Çivi
dblp:78/5612
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 50% 3D vision · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing › surface fitting
implicit polynomial fitting |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | The 3L Algorithm for Fitting Implicit Polynomial Curves and Surfaces to Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2000 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | The 3L Algorithm for Fitting Implicit Polynomial Curves and Surfaces to Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2000 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | The 3L Algorithm for Fitting Implicit Polynomial Curves and Surfaces to Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2000 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
shape recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | The 3L Algorithm for Fitting Implicit Polynomial Curves and Surfaces to Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear constraints · 0.1euclidean and affine invariants · 0.13l algorithm · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | The 3L Algorithm for Fitting Implicit Polynomial Curves and Surfaces to DataabstractWe introduce a completely new approach to fitting implicit polynomial geometric shape models to data and to studying these polynomials. The power of these models is in their ability to represent nonstar complex shapes in two(2D) and three-dimensional (3D) data to permit fast, repeatable fitting to unorganized data which may not be uniformly sampled and which may contain gaps, to permit position-invariant shape recognition based on new complete sets of Euclidean and affine invariants and to permit fast, stable single-computation pose estimation. The algorithm represents a significant advancement of implicit polynomial technology for four important reasons. First, it is orders of magnitude taster than existing fitting methods for implicit polynomial 2D curves and 3D surfaces, and the algorithms for 2D and 3D are essentially the same. Second, it has significantly better repeatability, numerical stability, and robustness than current methods in dealing with noisy, deformed, or missing data. Third, it can easily fit polynomials of high, such as 14th or 16th, degree. Fourth, additional linear constraints can be easily incorporated into the fitting process, and general linear vector space concepts apply. Michael M. Blane, Zhibin Lei, Hakan Çivi, David B. Cooper |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |