Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Suzanne Collin
dblp:78/6160
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 54% Compilers and program optimization · 46% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization
code generation |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Efficient Dynamic Dispatch without Virtual Function Tables: The SmallEiffel Compiler · OOPSLA 1997 |
Compilers and program optimization
dead code elimination |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Efficient Dynamic Dispatch without Virtual Function Tables: The SmallEiffel Compiler · OOPSLA 1997 |
Programming languages and type systems › method dispatch
dynamic dispatch |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Efficient Dynamic Dispatch without Virtual Function Tables: The SmallEiffel Compiler · OOPSLA 1997 |
Programming languages and type systems › type inference
static type inference |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Efficient Dynamic Dispatch without Virtual Function Tables: The SmallEiffel Compiler · OOPSLA 1997 |
Programming languages and type systems › object-oriented programming
multiple inheritance |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Efficient Dynamic Dispatch without Virtual Function Tables: The SmallEiffel Compiler · OOPSLA 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
type inference · 0.0static binary branch code · 0.0inlining · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Context Beyond Simple Rules: Deploying an Automated NLP-Based Pipeline for Sentiment and Theme Prediction in Paediatric Healthcare SettingabstractThe National Health Service (NHS) uses the Friends and Family Test (FFT) to gather patient feedback aimed at improving service quality and satisfaction. The current workflow involves FFT feedback processed manually by the Patient Experience team to identify sentiment and theme, which is a time-consuming and unsustainable approach given the large volume of data. To address this, we proposed and implemented a two-phase solution that is adaptable with limited computational resources that has no access to GPUs: (1) training and evaluation of lightweight, fine-tuned transformer-based models using routinely collected, expert-reviewed feedback data, and (2) deployment of these models within an automated pipeline for sentiment prediction and theme classification, involving a human-in-the-loop verification process. Our experiments and results validated on expert-annotated data collected over a period of 3.5 years achieve the best performance with an F1-score of 88.14% in sentiment classification and 71.47% in theme classification. This paper details the implementation, testing, and monitoring of our proposed solution in a paediatric healthcare setting, highlighting the ability to generate near-real-time results. Our deployed solution has substantially decreased the time needed to manually process approximately 2000 feedback pieces each month by delivering automated outcomes daily, a task that previously required several days for completion. In addition, we discuss the broader implications of our findings and potential enhancements for scalable deployment across NHS trusts. Source code will be open-sourced and published here: https://github.com/gosh-dre/FFT-NLP-Pipeline. Caroline Baumgartner, Ewart Jonny Sheldon, Sebin Sabu, Jaskaran Singh Kawatra, Pavithra Rajendran, Shiren Patel, Mark Harris, Suzanne Collin, Taraben Kapadia |
ECAI | 8 |
| 1997 | Efficient Dynamic Dispatch without Virtual Function Tables: The SmallEiffel CompilerabstractSmallEiffel is an Eiffel compiler which uses a fast simple type inference mechanism to remove most late binding calls, replacing them by static bindings. Starting from the system's entry point, it compiles only statically living code, which saves compiling and then removing dead code. As the whole system is analyzed at compile time, multiple inheritance and genericity do not cause any overhead.SmallEiffel features a coding scheme which eliminates the need for virtual function tables. Dynamic dispatch is implemented without any array access but uses a simple static binary branch code. We show that this implementation makes it possible to use modern hardware very efficiently. It also allows us to inline more calls even when dynamic dispatch is required. Some more dispatch sites are removed after the type inference algorithm has been performed, if the different branches of a dispatch site lead to the same code.The advantage of this approach is that it greatly speeds up execution time and considerably decreases the amount of generated code. Olivier Zendra, Dominique Colnet, Suzanne Collin |
OOPSLA | 3 |
| 1994 | Syntactic Analysis of Technical Drawing DimensionsabstractWe present a syntactic approach to technical drawing dimensions analysis. A specific grammar is used to describe dimensions of drawings. This grammar can be graphically designed by combining different graphic primitives. The algorithm used for analysis can start at different points of the grammar. The analysis proceeds bottom-up and top-down according to previously obtained results. Suzanne Collin, Dominique Colnet |
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 1993 | Don't tell mom I'm doing document analysis; she believes I'm in the computer vision fieldabstractTwo kinds of knowledge can be distinguished in technical document interpretation: structural and syntactic knowledge, referring to the representation rules of objects, and semantic knowledge, referring to the objects themselves. It is shown how drawing analysis can be seen as a reading of the document in terms of discrete and non-discrete signs, the reading strategies being activated by specific symbols. An example of such a reading for a specific layer, annotations such as dimensioning, is presented.> Suzanne Collin, Karl Tombre, Pascal Vaxivière |
ICDAR | 1 |