EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Günay Dogan
dblp:78/7812
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing › shape analysis › non-rigid shape analysis
elastic shape analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A fast algorithm for elastic shape distances between closed planar curves · CVPR 2015 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A fast algorithm for elastic shape distances between closed planar curves · CVPR 2015 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape similarity |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A fast algorithm for elastic shape distances between closed planar curves · CVPR 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nonlinear constrained optimization · 0.2dynamic programming · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | A fast algorithm for elastic shape distances between closed planar curvesabstractEffective computational tools for shape analysis are needed in many areas of science and engineering. We address this and propose a new fast iterative algorithm to compute the elastic geodesic distance between shapes of closed planar curves. The original algorithm for this has cubic time complexity with respect to the number of nodes per curve. Hence it is not suitable for large shape data sets. We aim for large-scale shape analysis and thus propose an iterative algorithm based on the original one but with quadratic time complexity. In practice, we observe subquadratic, almost linear running times, and that our algorithm scales very well with large numbers of nodes. The key to our algorithm is the decoupling of the optimization for the starting point and rotation from that of the reparametrization, and the development of fast dynamic programming and iterative nonlinear constrained optimization algorithms that work in tandem to compute optimal reparametrizations fast. Günay Dogan, Javier Bernal, Charles R. Hagwood |
CVPR | 1 |