Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rosario Arjona
dblp:78/9992
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-9717-2228ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 61% Biometric security · 30% Privacy and data protection · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography › code-based cryptography
classic mceliece |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A facial authentication system using post-quantum-secure data generated on mobile devices · MobiCom 2022 |
Biometric security › face recognition
face authentication |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A facial authentication system using post-quantum-secure data generated on mobile devices · MobiCom 2022 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
homomorphic encryption |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A facial authentication system using post-quantum-secure data generated on mobile devices · MobiCom 2022 |
Privacy and data protection
biometric privacy |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | A facial authentication system using post-quantum-secure data generated on mobile devices · MobiCom 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
post-quantum cryptography · 0.6homomorphic encryption · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | A lightweight remote attestation using PUFs and hash-based signatures for low-end IoT devicesabstractRemote attestation is a powerful mechanism that allows a verifier to know if the hardware of an IoT (Internet-of-Thing) device (acting as a prover) has been counterfeited or tampered with and if its firmware has been altered. Remote attestation is based on collecting and reporting measurements in a trusted way, and should be lightweight for resource-constrained IoT devices. This work proposes to include a low-cost Root of Trust for Measuring and Reporting (RoTMR) in the prover, based on the combination of a Physically Unclonable Function (PUF) and an Attestation Read-Only Memory (A-ROM), and to use hash-based digital signatures in the attestation protocol. The proposed RoTMR is addressed to IoT devices based on a microcontroller that executes some application code (the measurable object) located in an external non-volatile memory accessible by an attacker. The secret keys required by the digital signatures are not stored but reconstructed using the PUF. The A-ROM contains the attestation instructions and ensures that its contents cannot be altered and that its instructions are executed sequentially without modification. The use of hash-based digital signatures makes the solution quantum-resistant and very robust because its security relies solely on the unidirectionality of a hash function. The proposed attestation protocol takes advantage of the fact that One-Time Signature (OTS) generation and Many-Time Signature (MTS) verification are very well suited for low-end devices, and the MTS scheme is suitable for the verifier application context. The proposal was validated experimentally with the ESP32 microcontroller, which is widely employed in IoT devices, by using its SRAM as PUF and implementing WOTS+, which is a type of Winternitz One-Time Signature scheme (WOTS), the One-Time Signature of Smart Digital Signatures scheme (SDS-OTS), and the MTS schemes constructed with them. The OTS schemes require smaller codes and thus smaller A-ROM than MTS and ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm). The code of one of the WOTS+ takes about 4 times less space than ECDSA. In terms of execution times, the OTS schemes are very fast. One of the WOTS+ performs all the signature operations in a few tens of milliseconds. The OTS schemes (especially the SDS-OTS) are also very efficient in terms of communication bandwidth because they use small signatures compared to other post-quantum solutions. Roberto Román, Rosario Arjona, Iluminada Baturone |
Future Gener. Comput. Syst. | 2 |
| 2022 | A facial authentication system using post-quantum-secure data generated on mobile devicesabstractThis paper describes a demonstrator of a post-quantum-secure facial authentication system distributed between a mobile device acting as a client and a remote computer acting as an authentication server. Homomorphic encryption based on Classic McEliece, one of the fourth-round candidates of the NIST post-quantum standardization process, is carried out by the client for protecting the biometric data extracted from the users' faces at enrollment and verification. The remote computer only stores and compares the received protected data, thus preserving user privacy. An Android App and a Graphical User Interface (GUI) were implemented at the client and the server, respectively, to show the system performance in terms of computation and security. Paula López-González, Rosario Arjona, Roberto Román, Iluminada Baturone |
MobiCom | 2 |
| 2016 | A dual-factor access control system based on device and user intrinsic identifiersabstractThis paper proposes an access control system based on the simultaneous authentication of what the user has and who the user is. At enrollment phase, the wearable access device (a smart card, key fob, etc.) stores a template that results from the fusion of the intrinsic device identifier and the user biometric identifier. At verification phase, both the device and user identifiers are extracted and matched with the stored template. The device identifier is generated from the start-up values of the SRAM in the device hardware, which are exploited as a Physically Unclonable Function (PUF). Hence, if the device hardware is cloned, the authentic identifier is not generated. The user identifier is obtained from level-1 fingerprint features (directional image and singular points), which are extracted from the fingerprint images captured by the sensor in the access device. Hence, only genuine users with genuine devices are authorized to access and no sensitive information is stored or travels outside the access device. The proposal has been validated by using 560 fingerprints acquired in live by an optical sensor and 560 SRAM-based identifiers. Rosario Arjona, Iluminada Baturone |
IECON | 1 |