EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hoang Tran
dblp:79/11286
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-7068-5621ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 82% Trustworthy machine learning · 9% Learning theory · 9% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 80% Security and privacy of machine learning · 20% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 87% Energy-efficient computing · 13% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
1.9 | 3 | 2024 | Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization · ICLR 2024 Momentum Aggregation for Private Non-convex ERM · NeurIPS 2022 Better SGD using Second-order Momentum · NeurIPS 2022 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.5 | 3 | 2024 | Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization · ICLR 2024 Momentum Aggregation for Private Non-convex ERM · NeurIPS 2022 Differentially Private Online-to-batch for Smooth Losses · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Momentum Aggregation for Private Non-convex ERM · NeurIPS 2022 Better SGD using Second-order Momentum · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exploiting the Local Parabolic Landscapes of Adversarial Losses to Accelerate Black-Box Adversarial Attack · ECCV (5) 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Momentum Aggregation for Private Non-convex ERM · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Better SGD using Second-order Momentum · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Better SGD using Second-order Momentum · NeurIPS 2022 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exploiting the Local Parabolic Landscapes of Adversarial Losses to Accelerate Black-Box Adversarial Attack · ECCV (5) 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Differentially Private Online-to-batch for Smooth Losses · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic convex optimization
differentially private stochastic convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Differentially Private Online-to-batch for Smooth Losses · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
online optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Differentially Private Online-to-batch for Smooth Losses · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online-to-batch conversion |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Differentially Private Online-to-batch for Smooth Losses · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Differentially Private Online-to-batch for Smooth Losses · NeurIPS 2022 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
DNN training accelerator |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and Inference · ISCA 2021 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and Inference · ISCA 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Energy-efficient computing › energy-efficient architecture
energy-efficient accelerator |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and Inference · ISCA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
zeroth-order gradient estimation · 1.5renyi differential privacy · 1.5variance-reduced accelerated methods · 1.1stochastic gradient descent · 1.1sensitivity analysis · 1.1reduction · 1.1online convex optimization · 1.1momentum aggregation · 1.1black-box optimization · 1.1momentum correction · 0.6hessian-vector products · 0.6adaptive step size · 0.6performance modeling · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex OptimizationabstractWe introduce a new zeroth-order algorithm for private stochastic optimization on nonconvex and nonsmooth objectives.
Given a dataset of size $M$, our algorithm ensures $(\alpha,\alpha\rho^2/2)$-Renyi differential privacy and finds a $(\delta,\epsilon)$-stationary point so long as $M=\tilde\Omega(\frac{d}{\delta\epsilon^3} + \frac{d^{3/2}}{\rho\delta\epsilon^2})$.
This matches the optimal complexity found in its non-private zeroth-order analog.
Notably, although the objective is not smooth, we have privacy ``for free'' when $\rho \ge \sqrt{d}\epsilon$. Qinzi Zhang, Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Exploiting the Local Parabolic Landscapes of Adversarial Losses to Accelerate Black-Box Adversarial Attack
Hoang Tran, Dan Lu 0001 |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2022 | Better SGD using Second-order MomentumabstractWe develop a new algorithm for non-convex stochastic optimization that finds an $\epsilon$-critical point in the optimal $O(\epsilon^{-3})$ stochastic gradient and Hessian-vector product computations. Our algorithm uses Hessian-vector products to "correct'' a bias term in the momentum of SGD with momentum. This leads to better gradient estimates in a manner analogous to variance reduction methods. In contrast to prior work, we do not require excessively large batch sizes and are able to provide an adaptive algorithm whose convergence rate automatically improves with decreasing variance in the gradient estimates. We validate our results on a variety of large-scale deep learning architectures and benchmarks tasks. Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Momentum Aggregation for Private Non-convex ERMabstractWe introduce new algorithms and convergence guarantees for privacy-preserving non-convex Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) on smooth $d$-dimensional objectives. We develop an improved sensitivity analysis of stochastic gradient descent on smooth objectives that exploits the recurrence of examples in different epochs. By combining this new approach with recent analysis of momentum with private aggregation techniques, we provide an $(\epsilon,\delta)$-differential private algorithm that finds a gradient of norm $O\left(\frac{d^{1/3}}{(\epsilon N)^{2/3}}\right)$ in $O\left(\frac{N^{7/3}\epsilon^{4/3}}{d^{2/3}}\right)$ gradient evaluations, improving the previous best gradient bound of $\tilde O\left(\frac{d^{1/4}}{\sqrt{\epsilon N}}\right)$. Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Differentially Private Online-to-batch for Smooth LossesabstractWe develop a new reduction that converts any online convex optimization algorithm suffering $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret into an $\epsilon$-differentially private stochastic convex optimization algorithm with the optimal convergence rate $\tilde O(1/\sqrt{T} + 1/\epsilon T)$ on smooth losses in linear time, forming a direct analogy to the classical non-private ``online-to-batch'' conversion. By applying our techniques to more advanced adaptive online algorithms, we produce adaptive differentially private counterparts whose convergence rates depend on apriori unknown variances or parameter norms. Qinzi Zhang, Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and InferenceabstractThe growing prevalence and computational demands of Artificial Intelligence (AI) workloads has led to widespread use of hardware accelerators in their execution. Scaling the performance of AI accelerators across generations is pivotal to their success in commercial deployments. The intrinsic error-resilient nature of AI workloads present a unique opportunity for performance/energy improvement through precision scaling. Motivated by the recent algorithmic advances in precision scaling for inference and training, we designed RaPiD1, a 4-core AI accelerator chip supporting a spectrum of precisions, namely, 16 and 8-bit floating-point and 4 and 2-bit fixed-point. The 36mm2RaPiD chip fabricated in 7nm EUV technology delivers a peak 3.5 TFLOPS/W in HFP8 mode and 16.5 TOPS/W in INT4 mode at nominal voltage. Using a performance model calibrated to within 1% of the measurement results, we evaluated DNN inference using 4-bit fixed-point representation for a 4-core 1 RaPiD chip system and DNN training using 8-bit floating point representation for a 768 TFLOPs AI system comprising 4 32-core RaPiD chips. Our results show INT4 inference for batch size of 1 achieves 3 - 13.5 (average 7) TOPS/W and FP8 training for a mini-batch of 512 achieves a sustained 102 - 588 (average 203) TFLOPS across a wide range of applications. Swagath Venkataramani, Vijayalakshmi Srinivasan, Wei Wang 0333, Sanchari Sen, Ankur Agrawal, Monodeep Kar, Shubham Jain 0004, Alberto Mannari, Hoang Tran, Eri Ogawa, Kazuaki Ishizaki, Hiroshi Inoue, Marcel Schaal, Mauricio J. Serrano, Jungwook Choi, Xiao Sun 0013, Naigang Wang, Chia-Yu Chen, Allison Allain, James Bonanno, Nianzheng Cao, Robert Casatuta, Matthew Cohen, Bruce M. Fleischer, Michael Guillorn, Howard Haynie, Jinwook Jung, Mingu Kang, Kyu-Hyoun Kim, Siyu Koswatta, Sae Kyu Lee, Martin Lutz, Silvia M. Müller, Jinwook Oh, Ashish Ranjan 0001, Zhibin Ren, Scot Rider, Kerstin Schelm, Michael Scheuermann, Joel Silberman, Vidhi Zalani, Xin Zhang 0025, Ching Zhou, Matthew M. Ziegler, Vinay Shah, Moriyoshi Ohara, Pong-Fei Lu, Brian W. Curran, Sunil Shukla, Leland Chang, Kailash Gopalakrishnan |
ISCA | 10 |
| 2021 | Enabling long-range exploration in minimization of multimodal functionsabstractWe consider the problem of minimizing multi-modal loss functions with a large number of local optima. Since the local gradient points to the direction of the steepest slope in an infinitesimal neighborhood, an optimizer guided by the local gradient is often trapped in a local minimum. To address this issue, we develop a novel nonlocal gradient to skip small local minima by capturing major structures of the loss’s landscape in black-box optimization. The nonlocal gradient is defined by a directional Gaussian smoothing (DGS) approach. The key idea of DGS is to conducts 1D long-range exploration with a large smoothing radius along $d$ orthogonal directions in $R^d$, each of which defines a nonlocal directional derivative as a 1D integral. Such long-range exploration enables the nonlocal gradient to skip small local minima. The $d$ directional derivatives are then assembled to form the nonlocal gradient. We use the Gauss-Hermite quadrature rule to approximate the $d$ 1D integrals to obtain an accurate estimator. The superior performance of our method is demonstrated in three sets of examples, including benchmark functions for global optimization, and two real-world scientific problems. Jiaxin Zhang 0005, Hoang Tran, Dan Lu 0001 |
UAI | 2 |