Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Trevor T. Robinson

dblp:79/11484 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-6595-6308ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 9 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
8 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
mesh generation
1.542022
Propagating Design Updates to Structured Analysis Meshes · Comput. Aided Des. 2022
Decomposing complex thin-walled CAD models for hexahedral-dominant meshing · Comput. Aided Des. 2018
Singularities in structured meshes and cross-fields · Comput. Aided Des. 2018
Geometric modeling and processing › mesh generation
structured meshing
0.622018
Singularities in structured meshes and cross-fields · Comput. Aided Des. 2018
Enhanced medial-axis-based block-structured meshing in 2-D · Comput. Aided Des. 2016
Geometric modeling and processing › solid modeling
boundary representation
0.612022
Hierarchical CADNet: Learning from B-Reps for Machining Feature Recognition · Comput. Aided Des. 2022
Geometric modeling and processing
feature recognition
0.612022
Hierarchical CADNet: Learning from B-Reps for Machining Feature Recognition · Comput. Aided Des. 2022
Geometric modeling and processing › feature recognition
machining feature recognition
0.612022
Hierarchical CADNet: Learning from B-Reps for Machining Feature Recognition · Comput. Aided Des. 2022
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation
0.612022
Hierarchical CADNet: Learning from B-Reps for Machining Feature Recognition · Comput. Aided Des. 2022
Geometric modeling and processing › vector field design
cross fields
0.312018
Singularities in structured meshes and cross-fields · Comput. Aided Des. 2018
Geometric modeling and processing › mesh generation
hex-dominant meshing
0.312018
Decomposing complex thin-walled CAD models for hexahedral-dominant meshing · Comput. Aided Des. 2018
Geometric modeling and processing › skeletonization
medial axis transform
0.212016
Enhanced medial-axis-based block-structured meshing in 2-D · Comput. Aided Des. 2016
Geometric modeling and processing › solid modeling
cellular model
0.212015
Defining Simulation Intent · Comput. Aided Des. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

virtual topology operations · 0.9tensor factorization · 0.6relational machine learning · 0.6hierarchical clustering · 0.6graph convolutional network · 0.6deep learning · 0.6equivalencing · 0.4cellular modeling · 0.4singularity analysis · 0.3medial axis computation · 0.2virtual topology · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Application of tensor factorisation for CAE model preparation from CAD assembly models
abstract
Generating fit-for-purpose CAE models from complex CAD assemblies is time consuming and error-prone. Tedious tasks include identifying and isolating the components of interest, removing duplicate components, and correcting inconsistent component interfaces. In this paper a new approach to help engineers identify similar features and analyse the consistency of CAD assembly models is proposed. The method utilises a tensor factorisation technique developed for relational machine learning and applies it to B-Rep topological and geometrical relations. The model considers globally all the input relations to identify which entities in the assembly are similar (within a user-defined threshold) to a selected input entity. It is shown that a hierarchical clustering method can group entities, based on the similarities of their attributes and relationships with adjacent components. It is shown how some unsuspected CAD modelling errors show up as features which should be similar, but which are not. It is demonstrated how the technique can be used to support the, currently highly manual, task of decomposing a volume representing an internal fluid network into sub-volumes and features of significance.
Flavien Boussuge, Cecil G. Armstrong, Christopher M. Tierney, Trevor T. Robinson
Comput. Aided Des.4
2022 Hierarchical CADNet: Learning from B-Reps for Machining Feature Recognition
abstract
Deep learning approaches have been shown to be capable of recognizing shape features (e.g. machining features) in Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models in certain circumstances, yet still have issues when the features intersect, and in exploiting the geometric and topological information which comprises the boundary representation (B-Rep) of the typical CAD model. This paper presents a novel hierarchical B-Rep graph shape representation which encodes information about the surface geometry and face topology of the B-Rep. To learn from this new shape representation, a novel hierarchical graph convolutional network called Hierarchical CADNet has been created, which has been shown to outperform other state-of-the-art neural architectures on feature identification, including machining features that intersect, with improvements in accuracy for some more complex CAD models.
Andrew R. Colligan, Trevor T. Robinson, Declan C. Nolan, Yang Hua 0001, Weijuan Cao
Comput. Aided Des.2
2022 Propagating Design Updates to Structured Analysis Meshes
abstract
Generating structured meshes is often an expensive process, limiting the use of high-fidelity numerical simulation methods for design, especially when the design is not yet fixed and design updates are likely. For hexahedral meshes generated by decomposing a B-Rep model into regions for which simple meshing strategies are known, robustly propagating design modifications to the decomposed representation and subsequent mesh is very challenging. In this paper, an approach is presented to propagate parametric update and feature changes to structured meshes. Geometric and topological modifications on the design model are identified first, enabling the equivalent modifications to be identified on the decomposition of the design model. Virtual topology operations used to generate the initial decomposition are combined with the meshing constraints of individual sub-regions to update the decomposition and associated mesh locally. The approach is demonstrated for a number of design updates.
Benoit Lecallard, Christopher M. Tierney, Trevor T. Robinson, Cecil G. Armstrong, Declan C. Nolan, Alex Sansom
Comput. Aided Des.3
2018 Singularities in structured meshes and cross-fields
Harold J. Fogg, Jonathan E. Makem, Cecil G. Armstrong, Trevor T. Robinson
Comput. Aided Des.5
2018 Decomposing complex thin-walled CAD models for hexahedral-dominant meshing
Christopher M. Tierney, Cecil G. Armstrong, Trevor T. Robinson
Comput. Aided Des.4
2017 Using virtual topology operations to generate analysis topology
Christopher M. Tierney, Trevor T. Robinson, Cecil G. Armstrong
Comput. Aided Des.3
2016 Enhanced medial-axis-based block-structured meshing in 2-D
Harold J. Fogg, Cecil G. Armstrong, Trevor T. Robinson
Comput. Aided Des.3
2015 Defining Simulation Intent
abstract
Defining Simulation Intent involves capturing high level modelling and idealisation decisions in order to create an efficient and fit-for-purpose analysis. These decisions are recorded as attributes of the decomposed design space. An approach to defining Simulation Intent is described utilising three known technologies: Cellular Modelling, the subdivision of space into volumes of simulation significance (structures, gas paths, internal and external airflows, etc.); Equivalencing, maintaining functional links between different analysis representations of the same region of design space across multiple analysis models; and Virtual Topology, which offers tools for partitioning and de-partitioning the model without disturbing the manufacturing oriented design geometry. The end result is a convenient framework to which high-level analysis attributes can be applied, and from which detailed analysis models can be generated with a high degree of controllability, repeatability and automation. There are multiple novel aspects to the approach, including its reusability, robustness to changes in model topology and the inherent links created between analysis models at different levels of fidelity and physics. By utilising Simulation Intent, CAD modelling for simulation can be fully exploited and simulation work-flows can be more readily automated, reducing many repetitive manual tasks (e.g. the definition of appropriate coupling between elements of different types and the application of boundary conditions). The approach has been implemented and tested with practical examples, and significant benefits are demonstrated.
Declan C. Nolan, Christopher M. Tierney, Cecil G. Armstrong, Trevor T. Robinson
Comput. Aided Des.4
2006 Automated mixed dimensional modelling for the finite element analysis of swept and revolved CAD features
abstract
Thin-walled aerospace structures can be idealised as dimensionally reduced shell models. These models can be analysed in a fraction of the time required for a full 3D model yet still provide remarkably accurate results. The disadvantages of this approach are the time taken to derive the idealised model, though this is offset by the ease and rapidity of design optimisation with respect to parameters such as shell thickness, and the fact that the stresses in the local 3D details can not be resolved.A process for automatically creating a mixed dimensional idealisation of a component from its CAD model is outlined in this paper. It utilises information contained in the CAD feature tree to locate the sketches associated with suitable features in the model. Suitable features are those created by carrying out dimensional addition operations on 2D sketches, in particular sweeping the sketch along a line to create an extruded solid, or revolving the sketch around an axis to create an axisymetric solid. Geometric proximity information provided by the 2D Medial Axis Transform is used to determine slender regions in the sketch suitable for dimensional reduction. The slender regions in the sketch are used to create sheet bodies representing the thin regions of the component, into which local 3D solid models of complex details are embedded. Analyses of the resulting models provide accurate results in a fraction of the run time required for the 3D model analysis.Also discussed is a web service implementation of the process which automatically dimensionally reduces 2D planar sketches in the STEP format.
Trevor T. Robinson, Cecil G. Armstrong, G. McSparron, A. Quenardel, Hengan Ou, R. M. McKeag
Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling1