Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew W. Bilotti
dblp:79/1236
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Structured retrieval for question answering · SIGIR 2007 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval
structured document retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Structured retrieval for question answering · SIGIR 2007 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › passage retrieval
sentence retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Structured retrieval for question answering · SIGIR 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structured retrieval · 0.1bag-of-words retrieval · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Rank learning for factoid question answering with linguistic and semantic constraintsabstractThis work presents a general rank-learning framework for passage ranking within Question Answering (QA) systems using linguistic and semantic features. The framework enables query-time checking of complex linguistic and semantic constraints over keywords. Constraints are composed of a mixture of keyword and named entity features, as well as features derived from semantic role labeling. The framework supports the checking of constraints of arbitrary length relating any number of keywords. We show that a trained ranking model using this rich feature set achieves greater than a 20% improvement in Mean Average Precision over baseline keyword retrieval models. We also show that constraints based on semantic role labeling features are particularly effective for passage retrieval; when they can be leveraged, an 40% improvement in MAP over the baseline can be realized. Matthew W. Bilotti, Jonathan L. Elsas, Jaime G. Carbonell, Eric Nyberg |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2007 | Structured retrieval for question answeringabstractBag-of-words retrieval is popular among Question Answering (QA) system developers, but it does not support constraint checking and ranking on the linguistic and semantic information of interest to the QA system. We present anapproach to retrieval for QA, applying structured retrieval techniques to the types of text annotations that QA systems use. We demonstrate that the structured approach can retrieve more relevant results, more highly ranked, compared with bag-of-words, on a sentence retrieval task. We also characterize the extent to which structured retrieval effectiveness depends on the quality of the annotations. Matthew W. Bilotti, Paul Ogilvie, Jamie Callan, Eric Nyberg |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2006 | Evaluation for Scenario Question Answering Systems
Matthew W. Bilotti, Eric Nyberg |
LREC | 1 |