Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David S. Lees

dblp:79/1545 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 56% Motion planning and robot control · 40% Robot manipulation · 5%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
0.012004
Utility-based Plan Insertion for Continuous Resources · ICRA 2004
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
plan repair
0.012004
Utility-based Plan Insertion for Continuous Resources · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot kinematics
0.021996
A combinatorial approach to trajectory planning for binary manipulators · ICRA 1996
An efficient method for computing the forward kinematics of binary manipulators · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
forward kinematics
0.011996
An efficient method for computing the forward kinematics of binary manipulators · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
inverse kinematics
0.011996
A combinatorial approach to trajectory planning for binary manipulators · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory planning
0.011996
A combinatorial approach to trajectory planning for binary manipulators · ICRA 1996
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › multi-agent planning
plan merging
0.012004
Utility-based Plan Insertion for Continuous Resources · ICRA 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

utility maximization · 0.0incremental bounds refinement · 0.0precomputation · 0.0combinatorial search · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Utility-based Plan Insertion for Continuous Resources
abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of evaluating plan fragments for insertion into an existing plan. Preparing a plan that is robust to variations in continuous resources requires considering the uncertainty over these resources. For some situations, it is impractical to add branches to the plan a priori, because such situations may arise at any of a large number of points in execution. Adding all these potential branches to an existing plan would require an immense computational effort and result in a huge plan. In such a case, it makes more sense to precompute a plan fragment to react to such a situation and allow the execution system to insert the plan fragment into its current plan when appropriate. The problem can thus be seen as a restricted form of plan merging, but with the addition of uncertainty and continuous resources, and the criterion of maximizing utility rather than absolute goal achievement. We formalize the problem and introduce an efficient solution method, incremental bounds refinement, that iteratively narrows bounds on the expected value of adding a branch until it can be discriminated from the original plan.
Richard Washington, David S. Lees
ICRA2
1996 An efficient method for computing the forward kinematics of binary manipulators
abstract
Binary actuators have only two discrete states (denoted '0' and '1'), both of which are stable without feedback. As a result, manipulators built with binary actuators have a finite number of states. Compared to a manipulator built with continuous actuators, a binary manipulator provides good performance, and is also relatively inexpensive. However, the number of states of a binary manipulator grows exponentially with the number of actuators. While this makes the calculation of its inverse kinematics quite difficult, the discrete nature of a binary manipulator makes it possible to compute its forward kinematics more efficiently than for a continuously actuated manipulator. By pre-computing all possible configurations of each module of a binary manipulator (a finite and usually small number) it is possible to compute the forward kinematics from a set of joint parameters without using any transcendental functions.
David S. Lees, Gregory S. Chirikjian
ICRA1
1996 A combinatorial approach to trajectory planning for binary manipulators
abstract
Binary manipulators are powered by actuators which have only two stable states. Therefore, they can reach only a discrete (but possibly large) number of locations. Compared to a manipulator built with continuous actuators, a binary manipulator provides reasonable performance, and is relatively inexpensive (up to an order of magnitude cheaper). The number of states of a binary manipulator grows exponentially with the number of actuators. This makes the calculation of its inverse kinematics quite difficult. This paper presents a combinatorial method for computing the inverse kinematics of a binary manipulator that reduces the search space to a manageable size. It also creates reasonably smooth motions that follow a specified trajectory accurately (in both position and orientation), despite the discrete nature of binary actuation.
David S. Lees, Gregory S. Chirikjian
ICRA1
1995 Inverse kinematics of binary manipulators with applications to service robotics
abstract
Binary actuators have only two discrete states, both of which are stable without feedback. As a result, manipulators built with binary actuators have a finite number of states. The major benefits of binary actuation are that extensive feedback control is not required, task repeatability can be very high, and two-state actuators are generally very inexpensive, resulting in low cost robotic mechanisms. These manipulators therefore have great potential for use in the service sector, where the cost of standard, high performance, robotic manipulators is often difficult to justify. A binary manipulator by contrast, provides good performance, and is also relatively inexpensive. The most difficult challenge with a binary manipulator is to control it efficiently. Given that the number of configurations attainable by binary manipulators grows expotentially in the number of actuated degrees of freedom, calculation of inverse kinematics by direct enumeration of joint states and calculation of forward kinematics is not feasible in the highly actuated case. This paper presents an efficient method for performing binary manipulator inverse kinematics based on a continuum approach.
Gregory S. Chirikjian, David S. Lees
IROS (3)2