Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Juliane Schäfer
dblp:79/2739
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
0000-0002-7466-5959ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference › gene regulatory network inference
gaussian graphical model |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology
gene association network |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks · Bioinform. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
partial correlation regularization · 0.1false discovery rate · 0.1empirical bayes · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Regularized estimation of large-scale gene association networks using graphical Gaussian modelsabstractBACKGROUND: Graphical Gaussian models are popular tools for the estimation of (undirected) gene association networks from microarray data. A key issue when the number of variables greatly exceeds the number of samples is the estimation of the matrix of partial correlations. Since the (Moore-Penrose) inverse of the sample covariance matrix leads to poor estimates in this scenario, standard methods are inappropriate and adequate regularization techniques are needed. Popular approaches include biased estimates of the covariance matrix and high-dimensional regression schemes, such as the Lasso and Partial Least Squares. RESULTS: In this article, we investigate a general framework for combining regularized regression methods with the estimation of Graphical Gaussian models. This framework includes various existing methods as well as two new approaches based on ridge regression and adaptive lasso, respectively. These methods are extensively compared both qualitatively and quantitatively within a simulation study and through an application to six diverse real data sets. In addition, all proposed algorithms are implemented in the R package "parcor", available from the R repository CRAN. CONCLUSION: In our simulation studies, the investigated non-sparse regression methods, i.e. Ridge Regression and Partial Least Squares, exhibit rather conservative behavior when combined with (local) false discovery rate multiple testing in order to decide whether or not an edge is present in the network. For networks with higher densities, the difference in performance of the methods decreases. For sparse networks, we confirm the Lasso's well known tendency towards selecting too many edges, whereas the two-stage adaptive Lasso is an interesting alternative that provides sparser solutions. In our simulations, both sparse and non-sparse methods are able to reconstruct networks with cluster structures. On six real data sets, we also clearly distinguish the results obtained using the non-sparse methods and those obtained using the sparse methods where specification of the regularization parameter automatically means model selection. In five out of six data sets, Partial Least Squares selects very dense networks. Furthermore, for data that violate the assumption of uncorrelated observations (due to replications), the Lasso and the adaptive Lasso yield very complex structures, indicating that they might not be suited under these conditions. The shrinkage approach is more stable than the regression based approaches when using subsampling. Nicole Krämer 0002, Juliane Schäfer, Anne-Laure Boulesteix |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2005 | An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networksabstractMOTIVATION: Genetic networks are often described statistically using graphical models (e.g. Bayesian networks). However, inferring the network structure offers a serious challenge in microarray analysis where the sample size is small compared to the number of considered genes. This renders many standard algorithms for graphical models inapplicable, and inferring genetic networks an 'ill-posed' inverse problem. METHODS: We introduce a novel framework for small-sample inference of graphical models from gene expression data. Specifically, we focus on the so-called graphical Gaussian models (GGMs) that are now frequently used to describe gene association networks and to detect conditionally dependent genes. Our new approach is based on (1) improved (regularized) small-sample point estimates of partial correlation, (2) an exact test of edge inclusion with adaptive estimation of the degree of freedom and (3) a heuristic network search based on false discovery rate multiple testing. Steps (2) and (3) correspond to an empirical Bayes estimate of the network topology. RESULTS: Using computer simulations, we investigate the sensitivity (power) and specificity (true negative rate) of the proposed framework to estimate GGMs from microarray data. This shows that it is possible to recover the true network topology with high accuracy even for small-sample datasets. Subsequently, we analyze gene expression data from a breast cancer tumor study and illustrate our approach by inferring a corresponding large-scale gene association network for 3883 genes. Juliane Schäfer, Korbinian Strimmer |
Bioinform. | 1 |