Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chris Ganseman
dblp:79/2783
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 56% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Optimal robot excitation and identification · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › system identification
robot identification |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Optimal robot excitation and identification · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory design |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Optimal robot excitation and identification · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parameter estimation · 0.0maximum likelihood estimation · 0.0finite fourier series · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Experimental Identification of Robot Dynamics for ControlabstractThe paper discusses the experimental identification of dynamic robot models for their application in model based robot control, e.g., computed torque control. The accuracy of these controllers relies highly on the ability of the robot model to accurately predict the required actuator torques. The paper shows how this application reflects on the choices that have to be made in the different steps of the identification procedure, and consequently on the accuracy of the obtained model parameters and actuator torque prediction. Jan Swevers, Chris Ganseman, Xavier Chenut, Jean-Claude Samin |
ICRA | 2 |
| 1997 | Optimal robot excitation and identificationabstractThis paper discusses experimental robot identification based on a statistical framework. It presents a new approach toward the design of optimal robot excitation trajectories, and formulates the maximum-likelihood estimation of dynamic robot model parameters. The differences between the new design approach and the existing approaches lie in the parameterization of the excitation trajectory and in the optimization criterion. The excitation trajectory for each joint is a finite Fourier series. This approach guarantees periodic excitation which is advantageous because it allows: 1) time-domain data averaging; 2) estimation of the characteristics of the measurement noise, which is valuable in the case of maximum-likelihood parameter estimation. In addition, the use of finite Fourier series allows calculation of the joint velocities and acceleration in an analytic way from the measured position response, and allows specification of the bandwidth of the excitation trajectories. The optimization criterion is the uncertainty on the estimated parameters or a lower bound for it, instead of the often used condition of the parameter estimation problem. Simulations show that this criterion yields parameter estimates with smaller uncertainty bounds than trajectories optimized according to the classical criterion. Experiments on an industrial robot show that the presented trajectory design and maximum-likelihood parameter estimation approaches complement each other to make a practicable robot identification technique which yields accurate robot models. Jan Swevers, Chris Ganseman, Dilek Bilgin Tükel, Joris De Schutter, Hendrik Van Brussel |
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. | 2 |