Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bill Harrison

dblp:79/2829 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 62% Programming languages and type systems · 19% Compilers and program optimization · 19%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
design patterns
0.012000
A Debate on Language and Tool Support for Design Patterns · POPL 2000
Compilers and program optimization
code generation
0.012000
A Debate on Language and Tool Support for Design Patterns · POPL 2000
Programming languages and type systems
language design
0.012000
A Debate on Language and Tool Support for Design Patterns · POPL 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

comparative analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 A Debate on Language and Tool Support for Design Patterns
abstract
Design patterns have earned a place in the developer's arsenal of tools and techniques for software development. They have proved so useful, in fact, that some have called for their promotion to programming language features. In turn this has rekindled the age-old debate over the mechanism that belong in programming languages versus those that are better served by tools. The debate comes full circle when one contemplates code generation and methodological tool support for patterns. The authors compare and contrast programming languages, tools, and patterns to assess their relative merits and to clarify their roles in the development process.
Craig Chambers, Bill Harrison, John M. Vlissides
POPL2