Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

John A. Lehman

dblp:79/3264 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
program comprehension
0.011989
An Empirical Comparison of Textual and Graphical Data Structure Documentation for Cobol Programs · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1989
Software maintenance and evolution
software maintenance
0.011989
An Empirical Comparison of Textual and Graphical Data Structure Documentation for Cobol Programs · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controlled experiment · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Business graphics trends, two years later
John A. Lehman, V. Samba Murthy
Inf. Manag.1
1989 An Empirical Comparison of Textual and Graphical Data Structure Documentation for Cobol Programs
abstract
The author presents the results of an experimental investigation into the comparative usefulness of textual tools and graphical tools for the program understanding phase of Cobol program maintenance. Both novice and experienced programmers are used as subjects. The results show a slight superiority for graphical tools when they are used by less experienced programmers. They cast doubt on the importance of rigid adherence to program design methodologies for experienced programmers and on the extensibility of experiments using relatively inexperienced student subjects.>
John A. Lehman
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
1985 Personal computing vs. personal computers
John A. Lehman
Inf. Manag.1