Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Helmut Schmid
dblp:79/3420
· DBLP profile ↗
40ranked-venue papers
11as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8003-7708ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 39 · 11 first-author · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
15 papers |
Language models and text generation · 70% Information extraction and text analysis · 13% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 9% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 25 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | XToM: Exploring the Multilingual Theory of Mind for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 CUTE: Measuring LLMs' Understanding of Their Tokens · EMNLP 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
theory of mind |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | XToM: Exploring the Multilingual Theory of Mind for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
cross-lingual in-context learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BMIKE-53: Investigating Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing with In-Context Learning · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BMIKE-53: Investigating Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing with In-Context Learning · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
knowledge editing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BMIKE-53: Investigating Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing with In-Context Learning · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › knowledge editing
multilingual knowledge editing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BMIKE-53: Investigating Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing with In-Context Learning · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization
subword units |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CUTE: Measuring LLMs' Understanding of Their Tokens · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
tokenization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CUTE: Measuring LLMs' Understanding of Their Tokens · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
multilingual corpus |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Glot500: Scaling Multilingual Corpora and Language Models to 500 Languages · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Glot500: Scaling Multilingual Corpora and Language Models to 500 Languages · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › transliteration
transliteration mining |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | A Statistical Model for Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Transliteration Mining · ACL (1) 2012 An Algorithm for Unsupervised Transliteration Mining with an Application to Word Alignment · ACL 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dependency parsing with latent refinements of part-of-speech tags · EMNLP 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dependency parsing with latent refinements of part-of-speech tags · EMNLP 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
morphological tagging |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Efficient Higher-Order CRFs for Morphological Tagging · EMNLP 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
reranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Forest Reranking through Subtree Ranking · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012 |
Algorithms and data structures
ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Forest Reranking through Subtree Ranking · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
reordering model |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A Joint Sequence Translation Model with Integrated Reordering · ACL 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A Joint Sequence Translation Model with Integrated Reordering · ACL 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | An Algorithm for Unsupervised Transliteration Mining with an Application to Word Alignment · ACL 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Trace Prediction and Recovery with Unlexicalized PCFGs and Slash Features · ACL 2006 Parse Forest Computation of Expected Governors · ACL 2001 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics
verb classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Combining EM Training and the MDL Principle for an Automatic Verb Classification Incorporating Selectional Preferences · ACL 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › pronunciation modeling
grapheme-to-phoneme conversion |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Phonological Constraints and Morphological Preprocessing for Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversion · ACL 2007 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
conditional random field |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Efficient Higher-Order CRFs for Morphological Tagging · EMNLP 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › verb semantics
selectional preference |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Combining EM Training and the MDL Principle for an Automatic Verb Classification Incorporating Selectional Preferences · ACL 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › statistical parsing
unlexicalized parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Trace Prediction and Recovery with Unlexicalized PCFGs and Slash Features · ACL 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multilingual benchmarking · 1.0in-context learning · 0.9benchmark construction · 0.8language model pretraining · 0.7corpus scaling · 0.7split-merge training · 0.2hidden markov model · 0.2early updating · 0.2coarse-to-fine decoding · 0.2approximate inference · 0.2subtree ranking · 0.1forest reranking · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | XToM: Exploring the Multilingual Theory of Mind for Large Language ModelsabstractTheory of Mind (ToM), the ability to infer mental states in others, is pivotal for human social cognition. Existing evaluations of ToM in LLMs are largely limited to English, neglecting the linguistic diversity that shapes human cognition. This limitation raises a critical question: can LLMs exhibit Multilingual Theory of Mind, which is the capacity to reason about mental states across diverse linguistic contexts? To address this gap, we present XToM, a rigorously validated multilingual benchmark that evaluates ToM across five languages and incorporates diverse, contextually rich task scenarios. Using XToM, we systematically evaluate LLMs (e.g., DeepSeek R1), revealing a pronounced dissonance: while models excel in multilingual language understanding, their ToM performance varies across languages. Our findings expose limitations in LLMs' ability to replicate human-like mentalizing across linguistic contexts. Chunkit Chan, Yauwai Yim, Hongchuan Zeng, Zhiying Zou, Xinyuan Cheng, Zhifan Sun, Zheye Deng, Kawai Chung, Yuzhuo Ao, Yixiang Fan, Cheng Jiayang, Ercong Nie, Ginny Y. Wong, Helmut Schmid, Hinrich Schütze, Simon See, Yangqiu Song |
ACL (1) | 14 |
| 2025 | BMIKE-53: Investigating Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing with In-Context LearningabstractThis paper introduces BMIKE-53, a comprehensive benchmark for cross-lingual in-context knowledge editing (IKE) across 53 languages, unifying three knowledge editing (KE) datasets: zsRE, CounterFact, and WikiFactDiff.Crosslingual KE, which requires knowledge edited in one language to generalize across others while preserving unrelated knowledge, remains underexplored.To address this gap, we systematically evaluate IKE under zero-shot, oneshot, and few-shot setups, incorporating tailored metric-specific demonstrations.Our findings reveal that model scale and demonstration alignment critically govern cross-lingual IKE efficacy, with larger models and tailored demonstrations significantly improving performance.Linguistic properties, particularly script type, strongly influence performance variation across languages, with non-Latin languages underperforming due to issues like language confusion. Ercong Nie, Mingyang Wang 0003, Zifeng Ding, Helmut Schmid, Hinrich Schütze |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2024 | Robust Non-linear Normalization of Heterogeneous Feature Distributions with Adaptive Tanh-EstimatorsabstractFeature normalization is a crucial step in machine learning that scales numerical values to improve model effectiveness. Noisy or impure datasets can pose a challenge for traditional normalization methods as they may contain outliers that violate statistical assumptions, leading to reduced model performance and increased unpredictability. Non-linear Tanh-Estimators (TE) have been found to provide robust feature normalization, but their fixed scaling factor may not be appropriate for all distributions of feature values. This work presents a refinement to the TE that employs the Wasserstein distance to adaptively estimate the optimal scaling factor for each feature individually against a specified target distribution. The results demonstrate that this adaptive approach can outperform the current TE method in the literature in terms of convergence speed by enabling better initial training starts, thus reducing or eliminating the need to re-adjust model weights during early training phases due to inadequately scaled features. Empirical evaluation was done on synthetic data, standard toy computer vision datasets, and a real-world numeric tabular dataset. Felip Guimerà Cuevas, Helmut Schmid |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2024 | ToPro: Token-Level Prompt Decomposition for Cross-Lingual Sequence Labeling TasksabstractBolei Ma, Ercong Nie, Shuzhou Yuan, Helmut Schmid, Michael Färber, Frauke Kreuter, Hinrich Schuetze. Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Bolei Ma, Ercong Nie, Shuzhou Yuan, Helmut Schmid, Michael Färber 0001, Frauke Kreuter, Hinrich Schütze |
EACL (1) | 4 |
| 2024 | CUTE: Measuring LLMs' Understanding of Their TokensabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable performance on a wide variety of tasks.Most LLMs split text into multi-character tokens and process them as atomic units without direct access to individual characters.This raises the question: To what extent can LLMs learn orthographic information?To answer this, we propose a new benchmark, CUTE, which features a collection of tasks designed to test the orthographic knowledge of LLMs.We evaluate popular LLMs on CUTE, finding that most of them seem to know the spelling of their tokens, yet fail to use this information effectively to manipulate text, calling into question how much of this knowledge is generalizable. Lukas Edman, Helmut Schmid, Alexander Fraser 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2023 | Glot500: Scaling Multilingual Corpora and Language Models to 500 LanguagesabstractAyyoob ImaniGooghari, Peiqin Lin, Amir Hossein Kargaran, Silvia Severini, Masoud Jalili Sabet, Nora Kassner, Chunlan Ma, Helmut Schmid, André Martins, François Yvon, Hinrich Schütze. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. Ayyoob Imani, Peiqin Lin, Amir Hossein Kargaran, Silvia Severini, Masoud Jalili Sabet, Nora Kassner, Chunlan Ma, Helmut Schmid, André F. T. Martins, François Yvon, Hinrich Schütze |
ACL (1) | 8 |
| 2023 | Adaptive Bi-nonlinear Neural Networks Based on Complex Numbers with Weights Constrained Along the Unit Circle
Felip Guimerà Cuevas, Thomy Phan, Helmut Schmid |
PAKDD (1) | 3 |
| 2020 | Automatically Identifying Words That Can Serve as Labels for Few-Shot Text ClassificationabstractA recent approach for few-shot text classification is to convert textual inputs to cloze questions that contain some form of task description, process them with a pretrained language model and map the predicted words to labels.Manually defining this mapping between words and labels requires both domain expertise and an understanding of the language model's abilities.To mitigate this issue, we devise an approach that automatically finds such a mapping given small amounts of training data.For a number of tasks, the mapping found by our approach performs almost as well as hand-crafted label-to-word mappings. Timo Schick, Helmut Schmid, Hinrich Schütze |
COLING | 2 |
| 2017 | Statistical Models for Unsupervised, Semi-Supervised, and Supervised Transliteration MiningabstractWe present a generative model that efficiently mines transliteration pairs in a consistent fashion in three different settings: unsupervised, semi-supervised, and supervised transliteration mining. The model interpolates two sub-models, one for the generation of transliteration pairs and one for the generation of non-transliteration pairs (i.e., noise). The model is trained on noisy unlabeled data using the EM algorithm. During training the transliteration sub-model learns to generate transliteration pairs and the fixed non-transliteration model generates the noise pairs. After training, the unlabeled data is disambiguated based on the posterior probabilities of the two sub-models. We evaluate our transliteration mining system on data from a transliteration mining shared task and on parallel corpora. For three out of four language pairs, our system outperforms all semi-supervised and supervised systems that participated in the NEWS 2010 shared task. On word pairs extracted from parallel corpora with fewer than 2% transliteration pairs, our system achieves up to 86.7% F-measure with 77.9% precision and 97.8% recall. Hassan Sajjad 0001, Helmut Schmid, Alexander Fraser 0001, Hinrich Schütze |
Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2015 | The Operation Sequence Model - Combining N-Gram-Based and Phrase-Based Statistical Machine TranslationabstractIn this article, we present a novel machine translation model, the Operation Sequence Model (OSM), which combines the benefits of phrase-based and N-gram-based statistical machine translation (SMT) and remedies their drawbacks. The model represents the translation process as a linear sequence of operations. The sequence includes not only translation operations but also reordering operations. As in N-gram-based SMT, the model is: (i) based on minimal translation units, (ii) takes both source and target information into account, (iii) does not make a phrasal independence assumption, and (iv) avoids the spurious phrasal segmentation problem. As in phrase-based SMT, the model (i) has the ability to memorize lexical reordering triggers, (ii) builds the search graph dynamically, and (iii) decodes with large translation units during search. The unique properties of the model are (i) its strong coupling of reordering and translation where translation and reordering decisions are conditioned on n previous translation and reordering decisions, and (ii) the ability to model local and long-range reorderings consistently. Using BLEU as a metric of translation accuracy, we found that our system performs significantly better than state-of-the-art phrase-based systems (Moses and Phrasal) and N-gram-based systems (Ncode) on standard translation tasks. We compare the reordering component of the OSM to the Moses lexical reordering model by integrating it into Moses. Our results show that OSM outperforms lexicalized reordering on all translation tasks. The translation quality is shown to be improved further by learning generalized representations with a POS-based OSM. Nadir Durrani, Helmut Schmid, Alexander Fraser 0001, Philipp Koehn, Hinrich Schütze |
Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2014 | Investigating the Usefulness of Generalized Word Representations in SMT
Nadir Durrani, Philipp Koehn, Helmut Schmid, Alexander Fraser 0001 |
COLING | 3 |
| 2014 | Dependency parsing with latent refinements of part-of-speech tagsabstractIn this paper we propose a method to increase dependency parser performance without using additional labeled or unlabeled data by refining the layer of predicted part-of-speech (POS) tags. We perform experiments on English and German and show significant improvements for both languages. The refinement is based on generative split-merge training for Hidden Markov models (HMMs). Thomas Müller 0009, Richárd Farkas, Alex Judea, Helmut Schmid, Hinrich Schütze |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2013 | Class-Based Language Models for Chinese-English Parallel Corpus
Junfei Guo, Michael Walsh 0001, Helmut Schmid |
CICLing (2) | 4 |
| 2013 | Efficient Higher-Order CRFs for Morphological TaggingabstractTraining higher-order conditional random fields is prohibitive for huge tag sets.We present an approximated conditional random field using coarse-to-fine decoding and early updating.We show that our implementation yields fast and accurate morphological taggers across six languages with different morphological properties and that across languages higher-order models give significant improvements over 1 st -order models. Thomas Müller 0009, Helmut Schmid, Hinrich Schütze |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2013 | Model With Minimal Translation Units, But Decode With Phrases
Nadir Durrani, Alexander Fraser 0001, Helmut Schmid |
HLT-NAACL | 3 |
| 2013 | Knowledge Sources for Constituent Parsing of German, a Morphologically Rich and Less-Configurational LanguageabstractWe study constituent parsing of German, a morphologically rich and less-configurational language. We use a probabilistic context-free grammar treebank grammar that has been adapted to the morphologically rich properties of German by markovization and special features added to its productions. We evaluate the impact of adding lexical knowledge. Then we examine both monolingual and bilingual approaches to parse reranking. Our reranking parser is the new state of the art in constituency parsing of the TIGER Treebank. We perform an analysis, concluding with lessons learned, which apply to parsing other morphologically rich and less-configurational languages. Alexander Fraser 0001, Helmut Schmid, Richárd Farkas, Renjing Wang, Hinrich Schütze |
Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2012 | A Statistical Model for Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Transliteration Mining
Hassan Sajjad 0001, Alexander Fraser 0001, Helmut Schmid |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2012 | Dependency Parsing of Hungarian: Baseline Results and Challenges
Richárd Farkas, Veronika Vincze, Helmut Schmid |
EACL | 3 |
| 2012 | Forest Reranking through Subtree Ranking
Richárd Farkas, Helmut Schmid |
EMNLP-CoNLL | 2 |
| 2012 | A Comparative Investigation of Morphological Language Modeling for the Languages of the European Union
Thomas Müller 0009, Hinrich Schütze, Helmut Schmid |
HLT-NAACL | 3 |
| 2011 | A Joint Sequence Translation Model with Integrated Reordering
Nadir Durrani, Helmut Schmid, Alexander Fraser 0001 |
ACL | 2 |
| 2011 | An Algorithm for Unsupervised Transliteration Mining with an Application to Word Alignment
Hassan Sajjad 0001, Alexander Fraser 0001, Helmut Schmid |
ACL | 3 |
| 2011 | Comparing Two Techniques for Learning Transliteration Models Using a Parallel Corpus
Hassan Sajjad 0001, Nadir Durrani, Helmut Schmid, Alexander Fraser 0001 |
IJCNLP | 3 |
| 2010 | Hindi-to-Urdu Machine Translation through Transliteration
Nadir Durrani, Hassan Sajjad 0001, Alexander Fraser 0001, Helmut Schmid |
ACL | 4 |
| 2010 | Design and Application of a Gold Standard for Morphological Analysis: SMOR as an Example of Morphological Evaluation
Gertrud Faaß, Ulrich Heid, Helmut Schmid |
LREC | 3 |
| 2010 | A Corpus Representation Format for Linguistic Web Services: The D-SPIN Text Corpus Format and its Relationship with ISO Standards
Ulrich Heid, Helmut Schmid, Kerstin Eckart, Erhard W. Hinrichs |
LREC | 2 |
| 2009 | Tagging Urdu Text with Parts of Speech: A Tagger Comparison
Hassan Sajjad 0001, Helmut Schmid |
EACL | 2 |
| 2008 | Combining EM Training and the MDL Principle for an Automatic Verb Classification Incorporating Selectional Preferences
Sabine Schulte im Walde, Christian Hying, Christian Scheible, Helmut Schmid |
ACL | 4 |
| 2008 | Estimation of Conditional Probabilities With Decision Trees and an Application to Fine-Grained POS Tagging
Helmut Schmid, Florian Laws |
COLING | 1 |
| 2007 | Phonological Constraints and Morphological Preprocessing for Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversion
Vera Demberg, Helmut Schmid, Gregor Möhler |
ACL | 2 |
| 2007 | Tagging syllable boundaries with joint n-gram modelsabstractThis paper presents a statistical method for the segmentation of words into syllables which is based on a joint n-gram model. Our system assigns syllable boundaries to phonetically transcribed words. The syllabification task was formulated as a tagging task. The syllable tagger was trained on syllable-annotated phone sequences. In an evaluation using ten-fold cross-validation, the system correctly predicted the syllabification of German words with an accuracy by word of 99.85%, which clearly exceeds results previously reported in the literature. The best performance was observed for a context size of five preceding phones. A detailed qualitative error analysis suggests that a further reduction of the error rate by up to 90 % is possible by eliminating inconsistencies in the training database. Helmut Schmid, Bernd Möbius, Julia Weidenkaff |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2006 | Trace Prediction and Recovery with Unlexicalized PCFGs and Slash FeaturesabstractThis paper describes a parser which generates parse trees with empty elements in which traces and fillers are co-indexed.The parser is an unlexicalized PCFG parser which is guaranteed to return the most probable parse.The grammar is extracted from a version of the PENN treebank which was automatically annotated with features in the style of Klein and Manning (2003).The annotation includes GPSG-style slash features which link traces and fillers, and other features which improve the general parsing accuracy.In an evaluation on the PENN treebank (Marcus et al., 1993), the parser outperformed other unlexicalized PCFG parsers in terms of labeled bracketing fscore.Its results for the empty category prediction task and the trace-filler coindexation task exceed all previously reported results with 84.1% and 77.4% fscore, respectively. Helmut Schmid |
ACL | 1 |
| 2004 | Efficient Parsing of Highly Ambiguous Context-Free Grammars with Bit Vectors
Helmut Schmid |
COLING | 1 |
| 2004 | New Statistical Methods for Phrase Break Prediction
Helmut Schmid, Michaela Atterer |
COLING | 1 |
| 2004 | SMOR: A German Computational Morphology Covering Derivation, Composition and Inflection
Helmut Schmid, Arne Fitschen, Ulrich Heid |
LREC | 1 |
| 2002 | A Generative Probability Model for Unification-Based Grammars
Helmut Schmid |
COLING | 1 |
| 2002 | Lexicalization of Probabilistic Grammars
Helmut Schmid |
COLING | 1 |
| 2001 | Parse Forest Computation of Expected GovernorsabstractIn a headed tree, each terminal word can be uniquely labeled with a governing word and grammatical relation. This labeling is a summary of a syntactic analysis which eliminates detail, reflects aspects of semantics, and for some grammatical relations (such as subject of finite verb) is nearly uncontroversial. We define a notion of expected governor markup, which sums vectors indexed by governors and scaled by probabilistic tree weights. The quantity is computed in a parse forest representation of the set of tree analyses for a given sentence, using vector sums and scaling by inside probability and flow. Helmut Schmid, Mats Rooth |
ACL | 1 |
| 2000 | Robust German Noun Chunking With a Probabilistic Context-Free Grammar
Helmut Schmid, Sabine Schulte im Walde |
COLING | 1 |
| 1994 | Part-Of-Speech Tagging With Neural Networks
Helmut Schmid |
COLING | 1 |