Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bernd van Linder

dblp:79/4100 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Logic in computer science › modal logic
dynamic logic
0.011999
A Logical Approach to the Dynamics of Commitments · Artif. Intell. 1999
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 A Logical Approach to the Dynamics of Commitments
John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Wiebe van der Hoek, Bernd van Linder
Artif. Intell.3
1998 Formalising Abilities and Opportunities of Agents
abstract
We present a formal system to reason about and specify the behavior of multiple intelligent artificial agents. Essentially, each agent can perform certain actions, and it may possess a variety of information in order to reason about its and other agent's actions. Thus, our KARO-framework tries to deal formally with the notion of Knowledge, possessed by the agents, and their possible execution of actions. In particular, each agent may reason about its —or, alternatively, other's— Abilities to perform certain actions, the possible Results of such an execution and the availability of the Opportunities to take a particular action. Formally, we combine dynamic and epistemic logic into one modal system, and add the notion of ability to it. We demonstrate that there are several options to define the ability to perform a sequentially composed action, and we outline several properties under two alternative choices. Also, the agents' views on the correctness and feasibility of their plans are highlighted. Finally, the complications in the completeness proof for both systems indicate that the presence of abilities in the logic makes the use of infinite proof rules useful, if not inevitable.
Bernd van Linder, Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Ch. Meyer
Fundam. Informaticae1
1997 The Dynamics of Default Reasoning
Bernd van Linder, Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Ch. Meyer
Data Knowl. Eng.1
1995 The Dynamics of Default Reasoning (Extended Abstract)
Bernd van Linder, Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Ch. Meyer
ECSQARU1
1994 Tests as Epistemic Updates
Bernd van Linder, Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Ch. Meyer
ECAI1