Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bernd van Linder
dblp:79/4100
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Logic in computer science › modal logic
dynamic logic |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | A Logical Approach to the Dynamics of Commitments · Artif. Intell. 1999 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | A Logical Approach to the Dynamics of Commitments
John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Wiebe van der Hoek, Bernd van Linder |
Artif. Intell. | 3 |
| 1998 | Formalising Abilities and Opportunities of AgentsabstractWe present a formal system to reason about and specify the behavior of multiple intelligent artificial agents. Essentially, each agent can perform certain actions, and it may possess a variety of information in order to reason about its and other agent's actions. Thus, our KARO-framework tries to deal formally with the notion of Knowledge, possessed by the agents, and their possible execution of actions. In particular, each agent may reason about its —or, alternatively, other's— Abilities to perform certain actions, the possible Results of such an execution and the availability of the Opportunities to take a particular action. Formally, we combine dynamic and epistemic logic into one modal system, and add the notion of ability to it. We demonstrate that there are several options to define the ability to perform a sequentially composed action, and we outline several properties under two alternative choices. Also, the agents' views on the correctness and feasibility of their plans are highlighted. Finally, the complications in the completeness proof for both systems indicate that the presence of abilities in the logic makes the use of infinite proof rules useful, if not inevitable. Bernd van Linder, Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Ch. Meyer |
Fundam. Informaticae | 1 |
| 1997 | The Dynamics of Default Reasoning
Bernd van Linder, Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Ch. Meyer |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 1 |
| 1995 | The Dynamics of Default Reasoning (Extended Abstract)
Bernd van Linder, Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Ch. Meyer |
ECSQARU | 1 |
| 1994 | Tests as Epistemic Updates
Bernd van Linder, Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Ch. Meyer |
ECAI | 1 |