Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Petros Mol
dblp:79/4527
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 40% Efficient and distributed learning · 40% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
activation sparsity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computation · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
conditional computation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computation · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree
differentiable decision tree |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computation · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network layers |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computation · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
tree ensembles |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computation · ICML 2020 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
lattice-based cryptography |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Pseudorandom Knapsacks and the Sample Complexity of LWE Search-to-Decision Reductions · CRYPTO 2011 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography › lattice-based cryptography
learning with errors |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Pseudorandom Knapsacks and the Sample Complexity of LWE Search-to-Decision Reductions · CRYPTO 2011 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
pseudorandom functions |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Pseudorandom Knapsacks and the Sample Complexity of LWE Search-to-Decision Reductions · CRYPTO 2011 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security
search-to-decision reductions |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Pseudorandom Knapsacks and the Sample Complexity of LWE Search-to-Decision Reductions · CRYPTO 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
forward and backward propagation · 0.4conditional computation · 0.4SGD · 0.4knapsack constructions · 0.1LWE reductions · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional ComputationabstractNeural networks and tree ensembles are state-of-the-art learners, each with its unique statistical and computational advantages. We aim to combine these advantages by introducing a new layer for neural networks, composed of an ensemble of differentiable decision trees (a.k.a. soft trees). While differentiable trees demonstrate promising results in the literature, they are typically slow in training and inference as they do not support conditional computation. We mitigate this issue by introducing a new sparse activation function for sample routing, and implement true conditional computation by developing specialized forward and backward propagation algorithms that exploit sparsity. Our efficient algorithms pave the way for jointly training over deep and wide tree ensembles using first-order methods (e.g., SGD). Experiments on 23 classification datasets indicate over 10x speed-ups compared to the differentiable trees used in the literature and over 20x reduction in the number of parameters compared to gradient boosted trees, while maintaining competitive performance. Moreover, experiments on CIFAR, MNIST, and Fashion MNIST indicate that replacing dense layers in CNNs with our tree layer reduces the test loss by 7-53% and the number of parameters by 8x. We provide an open-source TensorFlow implementation with a Keras API. Hussein Hazimeh 0001, Natalia Ponomareva 0001, Petros Mol, Zhenyu Tan, Rahul Mazumder |
ICML | 3 |
| 2011 | Pseudorandom Knapsacks and the Sample Complexity of LWE Search-to-Decision Reductions
Daniele Micciancio, Petros Mol |
CRYPTO | 2 |