Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Petros Mol

dblp:79/4527 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 40% Efficient and distributed learning · 40% Deep learning architectures and training · 20%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
activation sparsity
0.412020
The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computation · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
conditional computation
0.412020
The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computation · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree
differentiable decision tree
0.412020
The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computation · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network layers
0.412020
The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computation · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
tree ensembles
0.412020
The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computation · ICML 2020
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
lattice-based cryptography
0.112011
Pseudorandom Knapsacks and the Sample Complexity of LWE Search-to-Decision Reductions · CRYPTO 2011
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography › lattice-based cryptography
learning with errors
0.112011
Pseudorandom Knapsacks and the Sample Complexity of LWE Search-to-Decision Reductions · CRYPTO 2011
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
pseudorandom functions
0.112011
Pseudorandom Knapsacks and the Sample Complexity of LWE Search-to-Decision Reductions · CRYPTO 2011
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security
search-to-decision reductions
0.112011
Pseudorandom Knapsacks and the Sample Complexity of LWE Search-to-Decision Reductions · CRYPTO 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

forward and backward propagation · 0.4conditional computation · 0.4SGD · 0.4knapsack constructions · 0.1LWE reductions · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computation
abstract
Neural networks and tree ensembles are state-of-the-art learners, each with its unique statistical and computational advantages. We aim to combine these advantages by introducing a new layer for neural networks, composed of an ensemble of differentiable decision trees (a.k.a. soft trees). While differentiable trees demonstrate promising results in the literature, they are typically slow in training and inference as they do not support conditional computation. We mitigate this issue by introducing a new sparse activation function for sample routing, and implement true conditional computation by developing specialized forward and backward propagation algorithms that exploit sparsity. Our efficient algorithms pave the way for jointly training over deep and wide tree ensembles using first-order methods (e.g., SGD). Experiments on 23 classification datasets indicate over 10x speed-ups compared to the differentiable trees used in the literature and over 20x reduction in the number of parameters compared to gradient boosted trees, while maintaining competitive performance. Moreover, experiments on CIFAR, MNIST, and Fashion MNIST indicate that replacing dense layers in CNNs with our tree layer reduces the test loss by 7-53% and the number of parameters by 8x. We provide an open-source TensorFlow implementation with a Keras API.
Hussein Hazimeh 0001, Natalia Ponomareva 0001, Petros Mol, Zhenyu Tan, Rahul Mazumder
ICML3
2011 Pseudorandom Knapsacks and the Sample Complexity of LWE Search-to-Decision Reductions
Daniele Micciancio, Petros Mol
CRYPTO2