EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peiyu Zhang 0002
dblp:79/4792-2
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-1290-5274ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 27% Efficient and distributed learning · 23% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › hypergraph learning
hypergraph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MIHC: Multi-View Interpretable Hypergraph Neural Networks with Information Bottleneck for Chip Congestion Prediction · NeurIPS 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
optimal control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | End-to-End Learning Framework for Solving Non-Markovian Optimal Control · ICML 2025 |
Electronic design automation › physical design › routing
congestion prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MIHC: Multi-View Interpretable Hypergraph Neural Networks with Information Bottleneck for Chip Congestion Prediction · NeurIPS 2025 |
Electronic design automation
physical design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MIHC: Multi-View Interpretable Hypergraph Neural Networks with Information Bottleneck for Chip Congestion Prediction · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › control theory › optimal control
linear quadratic regulator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | End-to-End Learning Framework for Solving Non-Markovian Optimal Control · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › control theory
optimal control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | End-to-End Learning Framework for Solving Non-Markovian Optimal Control · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › distributed training systems
device placement |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Structure-Aware Framework for Learning Device Placements on Computation Graphs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Structure-Aware Framework for Learning Device Placements on Computation Graphs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Electronic design automation › physical design › VLSI layout
layout and routing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | MIHC: Multi-View Interpretable Hypergraph Neural Networks with Information Bottleneck for Chip Congestion Prediction · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
system identification · 1.7subgraph reasoning · 1.7multi-view hypergraph representation · 1.7information bottleneck · 1.7fractional calculus · 1.7deep learning · 1.7reinforcement learning · 0.8policy optimization · 0.8graph parsing network · 0.8graph coarsening · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | End-to-End Learning Framework for Solving Non-Markovian Optimal ControlabstractInteger-order calculus fails to capture the long-range dependence (LRD) and memory effects found in many complex systems. Fractional calculus addresses these gaps through fractional-order integrals and derivatives, but fractional-order dynamical systems pose substantial challenges in system identification and optimal control tasks. In this paper, we theoretically derive the optimal control via linear quadratic regulator (LQR) for fractional-order linear time-invariant (FOLTI) systems and develop an end-to-end deep learning framework based on this theoretical foundation. Our approach establishes a rigorous mathematical model, derives analytical solutions, and incorporates deep learning to achieve data-driven optimal control of FOLTI systems. Our key contributions include: (i) proposing a novel method for system identification and optimal control strategy in FOLTI systems, (ii) developing the first end-to-end data-driven learning framework, Fractional-Order Learning for Optimal Control (FOLOC), that learns control policies from observed trajectories, and (iii) deriving theoretical bounds on the sample complexity for learning accurate control policies under fractional-order dynamics. Experimental results indicate that our method accurately approximates fractional-order system behaviors without relying on Gaussian noise assumptions, pointing to promising avenues for advanced optimal control. Xiaole Zhang, Peiyu Zhang 0002, Xiongye Xiao, Vasileios Tzoumas, Vijay Gupta 0001, Paul Bogdan |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | MIHC: Multi-View Interpretable Hypergraph Neural Networks with Information Bottleneck for Chip Congestion PredictionabstractWith AI advancement and increasing circuit complexity, efficient chip design through Electronic Design Automation (EDA) is critical. Fast and accurate congestion prediction in chip layout and routing can significantly enhance automated design performance. Existing congestion modeling methods are limited by **(i)** ineffective processing and fusion of multi-view circuit data information, and **(ii)** insufficient reliability and interpretability in the prediction process. To address these challenges, We propose **M**ulti-view **I**nterpretable **H**ypergraph for **C**hip (**MIHC**), a trustworthy 'multi-view hypergraph neural network'-based framework that **(i)** processes both graph and image information in unified hypergraph representations, capturing topological and geometric circuit data, and **(ii)** implements a novel subgraph Information Bottleneck mechanism identifying critical congestion-correlated regions to guide predictions. This represents the first attempt to incorporate such interpretability into congestion prediction through informative graph reasoning. Experiments show our model reduces NMAE by 16.67% and 8.57% in cell-based and grid-based predictions on ISPD2015, and 5.26% and 2.44% on CircuitNet-N28, respectively, compared to state-of-the-art methods. Rigorous cross-design generalization experiments further validate our method’s capability to handle entirely unseen circuit designs. Zeyue Zhang, Heng Ping, Peiyu Zhang 0002, Nikos Kanakaris, Xiaoling Lu, Paul Bogdan, Xiongye Xiao |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | A Structure-Aware Framework for Learning Device Placements on Computation GraphsabstractComputation graphs are Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) where the nodes correspond to mathematical operations and are used widely as abstractions in optimizations of neural networks. The device placement problem aims to identify optimal allocations of those nodes to a set of (potentially heterogeneous) devices. Existing approaches rely on two types of architectures known as grouper-placer and encoder-placer, respectively. In this work, we bridge the gap between encoder-placer and grouper-placer techniques and propose a novel framework for the task of device placement, relying on smaller computation graphs extracted from the OpenVINO toolkit. The framework consists of five steps, including graph coarsening, node representation learning and policy optimization. It facilitates end-to-end training and takes into account the DAG nature of the computation graphs. We also propose a model variant, inspired by graph parsing networks and complex network analysis, enabling graph representation learning and jointed, personalized graph partitioning, using an unspecified number of groups. To train the entire framework, we use reinforcement learning using the execution time of the placement as a reward. We demonstrate the flexibility and effectiveness of our approach through multiple experiments with three benchmark models, namely Inception-V3, ResNet, and BERT. The robustness of the proposed framework is also highlighted through an ablation study. The suggested placements improve the inference speed for the benchmark models by up to $58.2\%$ over CPU execution and by up to $60.24\%$ compared to other commonly used baselines. Shukai Duan 0002, Heng Ping, Nikos Kanakaris, Xiongye Xiao, Panagiotis Kyriakis, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Peiyu Zhang 0002, Guixiang Ma, Mihai Capota, Shahin Nazarian, Theodore L. Willke, Paul Bogdan |
NeurIPS | 7 |