Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eric Rescorla
dblp:79/4995
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 9 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
8 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 37% Network security · 22% Web and mobile security · 21% | |
| Computer networks
3 papers |
Internet architecture and protocols · 71% Network measurement and analytics · 16% Network management and operations · 11% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Web and mobile security
web PKI |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Let's Encrypt: An Automated Certificate Authority to Encrypt the Entire Web · CCS 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
pseudorandom generators |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A Systematic Analysis of the Juniper Dual EC Incident · CCS 2016 |
Network security › secure communication › network-layer security
virtual private networks |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A Systematic Analysis of the Juniper Dual EC Incident · CCS 2016 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
security analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Security Analysis of a Full-Body Scanner · USENIX Security Symposium 2014 |
Network measurement and analytics › internet measurement
deployment measurement |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Measuring the Practical Impact of DNSSEC Deployment · USENIX Security Symposium 2013 |
Internet architecture and protocols › domain name system
DNSSEC |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Measuring the Practical Impact of DNSSEC Deployment · USENIX Security Symposium 2013 |
Internet architecture and protocols
domain name system |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Measuring the Practical Impact of DNSSEC Deployment · USENIX Security Symposium 2013 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
random number generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | When private keys are public: results from the 2008 Debian OpenSSL vulnerability · Internet Measurement Conference 2009 |
Systems and software security › vulnerability management
vulnerability disclosure |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | When private keys are public: results from the 2008 Debian OpenSSL vulnerability · Internet Measurement Conference 2009 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
hash functions |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Deploying a New Hash Algorithm · NDSS 2006 |
Network security › secure communication › secure communication protocol
TLS |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | The Design and Implementation of Datagram TLS · NDSS 2004 |
Network security
security economics |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Security Holes . . . Who Cares? · USENIX Security Symposium 2003 |
Network security
SSL acceleration |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | SSLACC: A Clustered SSL Accelerator · USENIX Security Symposium 2002 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
certificate issuance |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | When private keys are public: results from the 2008 Debian OpenSSL vulnerability · Internet Measurement Conference 2009 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
public key infrastructure |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | When private keys are public: results from the 2008 Debian OpenSSL vulnerability · Internet Measurement Conference 2009 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
cryptographic accelerator |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | SSLACC: A Clustered SSL Accelerator · USENIX Security Symposium 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
system architecture design · 0.8measurement study · 0.8traffic fingerprinting · 0.2firmware modification · 0.2remote scanning · 0.1longitudinal measurement · 0.1protocol design · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Let's Encrypt: An Automated Certificate Authority to Encrypt the Entire WebabstractLet's Encrypt is a free, open, and automated HTTPS certificate authority (CA) created to advance HTTPS adoption to the entire Web. Since its launch in late 2015, Let's Encrypt has grown to become the world's largest HTTPS CA, accounting for more currently valid certificates than all other browser-trusted CAs combined. By January 2019, it had issued over 538~million certificates for 223~million domain names. We describe how we built Let's Encrypt, including the architecture of the CA software system (Boulder) and the structure of the organization that operates it (ISRG), and we discuss lessons learned from the experience. We also describe the design of ACME, the IETF-standard protocol we created to automate CA--server interactions and certificate issuance, and survey the diverse ecosystem of ACME clients, including Certbot, a software agent we created to automate HTTPS deployment. Finally, we measure Let's Encrypt's impact on the Web and the CA ecosystem. We hope that the success of Let's Encrypt can provide a model for further enhancements to the Web PKI and for future Internet security infrastructure. Josh Aas, Richard Barnes 0001, Benton Case, Zakir Durumeric, Peter Eckersley, Alan Flores-López, J. Alex Halderman, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews, James Kasten, Eric Rescorla, Seth D. Schoen, Brad Warren |
CCS | 10 |
| 2016 | A Systematic Analysis of the Juniper Dual EC IncidentabstractIn December 2015, Juniper Networks announced multiple security vulnerabilities stemming from unauthorized code in ScreenOS, the operating system for their NetScreen VPN routers. The more sophisticated of these vulnerabilities was a passive VPN decryption capability, enabled by a change to one of the elliptic curve points used by the Dual EC pseudorandom number generator. In this paper, we describe the results of a full independent analysis of the ScreenOS randomness and VPN key establishment protocol subsystems, which we carried out in response to this incident. While Dual EC is known to be insecure against an attacker who can choose the elliptic curve parameters, Juniper had claimed in 2013 that ScreenOS included countermeasures against this type of attack. We find that, contrary to Juniper's public statements, the ScreenOS VPN implementation has been vulnerable since 2008 to passive exploitation by an attacker who selects the Dual EC curve point. This vulnerability arises due to apparent flaws in Juniper's countermeasures as well as a cluster of changes that were all introduced concurrently with the inclusion of Dual EC in a single 2008 release. We demonstrate the vulnerability on a real NetScreen device by modifying the firmware to install our own parameters, and we show that it is possible to passively decrypt an individual VPN session in isolation without observing any other network traffic. We investigate the possibility of passively fingerprinting ScreenOS implementations in the wild. This incident is an important example of how guidelines for random number generation, engineering, and validation can fail in practice. Stephen Checkoway, Jacob Maskiewicz, Christina Garman, Joshua Fried, Shaanan Cohney, Matthew Green 0001, Nadia Heninger, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann, Eric Rescorla, Hovav Shacham |
CCS | 9 |
| 2014 | Security Analysis of a Full-Body Scanner
Keaton Mowery, Eric Wustrow, Tom Wypych, Corey Singleton, Chris Comfort, Eric Rescorla, J. Alex Halderman, Hovav Shacham, Stephen Checkoway |
USENIX Security Symposium | 6 |
| 2013 | Measuring the Practical Impact of DNSSEC Deployment
Wilson Lian, Eric Rescorla, Hovav Shacham, Stefan Savage |
USENIX Security Symposium | 2 |
| 2009 | When private keys are public: results from the 2008 Debian OpenSSL vulnerabilityabstractWe report on the aftermath of the discovery of a severe vulnerability in the Debian Linux version of OpenSSL. Systems affected by the bug generated predictable random numbers, most importantly public/private keypairs. To study user response to this vulnerability, we collected a novel dataset of daily remote scans of over 50,000 SSL/TLS-enabled Web servers, of which 751 displayed vulnerable certificates. We report three primary results. First, as expected from previous work, we find an extremely slow rate of fixing, with 30% of the hosts vulnerable when we began our survey on day 4 after disclosure still vulnerable almost six months later. However, unlike conventional vulnerabilities, which typically show a short, fast fixing phase, we observe a much flatter curve with fixing extending six months after the announcement. Second, we identify some predictive factors for the rate of upgrading. Third, we find that certificate authorities continued to issue certificates to servers with weak keys long after the vulnerability was disclosed. Scott Yilek, Eric Rescorla, Hovav Shacham, Brandon Enright, Stefan Savage |
Internet Measurement Conference | 2 |
| 2006 | Deploying a New Hash Algorithm
Steven M. Bellovin, Eric Rescorla |
NDSS | 2 |
| 2004 | The Design and Implementation of Datagram TLS
Nagendra Modadugu, Eric Rescorla |
NDSS | 2 |
| 2004 | Client-side caching for TLSabstractWe propose two new mechanisms for caching handshake information on TLS clients. The "fast-track" mechanism provides a client-side cache of a server's public parameters and negotiated parameters in the course of an initial, enabling handshake. These parameters need not be resent on subsequent handshakes. Fast-track reduces both network traffic and the number of round trips, and requires no additional server state. These savings are most useful in high-latency environments such as wireless networks. The second mechanism, "client-side session caching," allows the server to store an encrypted version of the session information on a client, allowing a server to maintain a much larger number of active sessions in a given memory footprint. Our design is fully backward-compatible with TLS: extended clients can interoperate with servers unaware of our extensions and vice versa. We have implemented our fast-track proposal to demonstrate the resulting efficiency improvements. Hovav Shacham, Dan Boneh, Eric Rescorla |
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. | 3 |
| 2003 | Security Holes . . . Who Cares?
Eric Rescorla |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2002 | SSLACC: A Clustered SSL Accelerator
Eric Rescorla, Adam Cain, Brian Korver |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |