Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexey Fedotov

dblp:79/5984 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 46% Coding theory · 46% Computational complexity · 7%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures › search trees
binary search trees
0.012001
The estimated cost of a search tree on binary words · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001
Coding theory › source coding
optimal coding
0.012001
The estimated cost of a search tree on binary words · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures
search trees
0.012001
The estimated cost of a search tree on binary words · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001
Coding theory
source coding
0.012001
The estimated cost of a search tree on binary words · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

approximation algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 The estimated cost of a search tree on binary words
abstract
The problem of constructing a binary search tree for a set of binary words has wide applications in computer science, biology, mineralogy, etc. Shannon considered a similar statement in his optimal coding theorem. It is NP-complete to construct a tree of minimum cost; therefore, the problem arises of finding simple algorithms for constructing nearly optimal trees. We show that there is a simple algorithm for constructing search trees sufficiently close to the optimal tree on average. By means of this algorithm we prove that for the optimal tree the average number of bits to be checked is near to its natural lower bound, i.e., the binary logarithm of the number of given words: their difference is less than 1.04.
Alexey Fedotov, Boris Ryabko
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1