Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Steven Messick

dblp:79/6247 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 80% Question answering and dialogue systems · 20%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology		 0.021987
Ontological Analysis: An Ongoing Experiment · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1987
Knowledge Level Engineering Ontological Analysis · AAAI 1986
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge level analysis		 0.011986
Knowledge Level Engineering Ontological Analysis · AAAI 1986
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
natural language interface		 0.011985
An Eclectic Approach to Building Natural Languages Interfaces · ACL 1985
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
expert systems		 0.011985
An Eclectic Approach to Building Natural Languages Interfaces · ACL 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ontological analysis · 0.0semantic grammar · 0.0lexical-functional grammar · 0.0incremental parsing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1987 Ontological Analysis: An Ongoing Experiment
James H. Alexander, Michael J. Freiling, Sheryl Shulman, Steven Rehfuss, Steven Messick
 Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.5
1986 Knowledge Level Engineering Ontological Analysis
James H. Alexander, Michael J. Freiling, Sheryl Shulman, Jeffery Staley, Steven Rehfuss, Steven Messick
 AAAI6
1985 An Eclectic Approach to Building Natural Languages Interfaces
abstract
INKA is a natural language interface to facilitate knowledge acquisition during expert system development for electronic instrument trouble-shooting. The expert system design methodology develops a domain definition, called GLIB, in the form of a semantic grammar. This grammar format enables GLIB to be used with the INGLISH interface, which constrains users to create statements within a subset of English. Incremental parsing in INGLISH allows immediate remedial information to be generated if a user deviates from the sublanguage. Sentences are translated into production rules using the methodology of lexical-functional grammar. The system is written in Smalltalk and, in INKA, produces rules for a Prolog inference engine.
Brian Phillips, Michael J. Freiling, James H. Alexander, Steven Messick, Steven Rehfuss, Sheldon Nicholl
 ACL4