Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Walter Karlen

dblp:80/10226 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-8643-3074ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% Learning paradigms · 9%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance
0.822019
CXPlain: Causal Explanations for Model Interpretation under Uncertainty · NeurIPS 2019
Granger-Causal Attentive Mixtures of Experts: Learning Important Features with Neural Networks · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.822019
CXPlain: Causal Explanations for Model Interpretation under Uncertainty · NeurIPS 2019
Granger-Causal Attentive Mixtures of Experts: Learning Important Features with Neural Networks · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.412020
Learning Counterfactual Representations for Estimating Individual Dose-Response Curves · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
dose-response estimation
0.412020
Learning Counterfactual Representations for Estimating Individual Dose-Response Curves · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
causal explanation
0.412019
CXPlain: Causal Explanations for Model Interpretation under Uncertainty · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.412019
CXPlain: Causal Explanations for Model Interpretation under Uncertainty · NeurIPS 2019
Medical and health informatics › digital health
digital biomarkers
0.412019
PhoneMD: Learning to Diagnose Parkinson's Disease from Smartphone Data · AAAI 2019
Medical and health informatics › clinical diagnosis › neurodegenerative disease diagnosis
parkinson's disease diagnosis
0.412019
PhoneMD: Learning to Diagnose Parkinson's Disease from Smartphone Data · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.312018
Not to Cry Wolf: Distantly Supervised Multitask Learning in Critical Care · ICML 2018
Medical and health informatics › clinical monitoring › patient monitoring
intensive care monitoring
0.312018
Not to Cry Wolf: Distantly Supervised Multitask Learning in Critical Care · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts
0.112019
Granger-Causal Attentive Mixtures of Experts: Learning Important Features with Neural Networks · AAAI 2019
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › mobile sensing
smartphone sensing
0.112019
PhoneMD: Learning to Diagnose Parkinson's Disease from Smartphone Data · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series classification
0.112018
Not to Cry Wolf: Distantly Supervised Multitask Learning in Critical Care · ICML 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

attentive deep learning · 0.8multitask network architecture · 0.7distant supervision · 0.7potential outcomes framework · 0.4neural network · 0.4granger causality · 0.4causal learning · 0.4bootstrap ensembling · 0.4attentive gating · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 A Deep Learning Approach to Diagnosing Multiple Sclerosis from Smartphone Data
abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects the central nervous system with a wide range of symptoms. MS can, for example, cause pain, changes in mood and fatigue, and may impair a person's movement, speech and visual functions. Diagnosis of MS typically involves a combination of complex clinical assessments and tests to rule out other diseases with similar symptoms. New technologies, such as smartphone monitoring in free-living conditions, could potentially aid in objectively assessing the symptoms of MS by quantifying symptom presence and intensity over long periods of time. Here, we present a deep-learning approach to diagnosing MS from smartphone-derived digital biomarkers that uses a novel combination of a multilayer perceptron with neural soft attention to improve learning of patterns in long-term smartphone monitoring data. Using data from a cohort of 774 participants, we demonstrate that our deep-learning models are able to distinguish between people with and without MS with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.88). Our experimental results indicate that digital biomarkers derived from smartphone data could in the future be used as additional diagnostic criteria for MS.
Patrick Schwab, Walter Karlen
IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informatics2
2020 Learning Counterfactual Representations for Estimating Individual Dose-Response Curves
abstract
Estimating what would be an individual's potential response to varying levels of exposure to a treatment is of high practical relevance for several important fields, such as healthcare, economics and public policy. However, existing methods for learning to estimate counterfactual outcomes from observational data are either focused on estimating average dose-response curves, or limited to settings with only two treatments that do not have an associated dosage parameter. Here, we present a novel machine-learning approach towards learning counterfactual representations for estimating individual dose-response curves for any number of treatments with continuous dosage parameters with neural networks. Building on the established potential outcomes framework, we introduce performance metrics, model selection criteria, model architectures, and open benchmarks for estimating individual dose-response curves. Our experiments show that the methods developed in this work set a new state-of-the-art in estimating individual dose-response.
Patrick Schwab, Lorenz Linhardt, Stefan Bauer, Joachim M. Buhmann, Walter Karlen
AAAI5
2019 PhoneMD: Learning to Diagnose Parkinson's Disease from Smartphone Data
abstract
Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disease that can affect a person’s movement, speech, dexterity, and cognition. Clinicians primarily diagnose Parkinson’s disease by performing a clinical assessment of symptoms. However, misdiagnoses are common. One factor that contributes to misdiagnoses is that the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease may not be prominent at the time the clinical assessment is performed. Here, we present a machine-learning approach towards distinguishing between people with and without Parkinson’s disease using long-term data from smartphone-based walking, voice, tapping and memory tests. We demonstrate that our attentive deep-learning models achieve significant improvements in predictive performance over strong baselines (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.85) in data from a cohort of 1853 participants. We also show that our models identify meaningful features in the input data. Our results confirm that smartphone data collected over extended periods of time could in the future potentially be used as a digital biomarker for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease.
Patrick Schwab, Walter Karlen
AAAI2
2019 Granger-Causal Attentive Mixtures of Experts: Learning Important Features with Neural Networks
abstract
Knowledge of the importance of input features towards decisions made by machine-learning models is essential to increase our understanding of both the models and the underlying data. Here, we present a new approach to estimating feature importance with neural networks based on the idea of distributing the features of interest among experts in an attentive mixture of experts (AME). AMEs use attentive gating networks trained with a Granger-causal objective to learn to jointly produce accurate predictions as well as estimates of feature importance in a single model. Our experiments show (i) that the feature importance estimates provided by AMEs compare favourably to those provided by state-of-theart methods, (ii) that AMEs are significantly faster at estimating feature importance than existing methods, and (iii) that the associations discovered by AMEs are consistent with those reported by domain experts.
Patrick Schwab, Ðorðe Miladinovic, Walter Karlen
AAAI3
2019 CXPlain: Causal Explanations for Model Interpretation under Uncertainty
abstract
Feature importance estimates that inform users about the degree to which given inputs influence the output of a predictive model are crucial for understanding, validating, and interpreting machine-learning models. However, providing fast and accurate estimates of feature importance for high-dimensional data, and quantifying the uncertainty of such estimates remain open challenges. Here, we frame the task of providing explanations for the decisions of machine-learning models as a causal learning task, and train causal explanation (CXPlain) models that learn to estimate to what degree certain inputs cause outputs in another machine-learning model. CXPlain can, once trained, be used to explain the target model in little time, and enables the quantification of the uncertainty associated with its feature importance estimates via bootstrap ensembling. We present experiments that demonstrate that CXPlain is significantly more accurate and faster than existing model-agnostic methods for estimating feature importance. In addition, we confirm that the uncertainty estimates provided by CXPlain ensembles are strongly correlated with their ability to accurately estimate feature importance on held-out data.
Patrick Schwab, Walter Karlen
NeurIPS2
2018 Not to Cry Wolf: Distantly Supervised Multitask Learning in Critical Care
abstract
Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) require constant and close supervision. To assist clinical staff in this task, hospitals use monitoring systems that trigger audiovisual alarms if their algorithms indicate that a patient’s condition may be worsening. However, current monitoring systems are extremely sensitive to movement artefacts and technical errors. As a result, they typically trigger hundreds to thousands of false alarms per patient per day - drowning the important alarms in noise and adding to the exhaustion of clinical staff. In this setting, data is abundantly available, but obtaining trustworthy annotations by experts is laborious and expensive. We frame the problem of false alarm reduction from multivariate time series as a machine-learning task and address it with a novel multitask network architecture that utilises distant supervision through multiple related auxiliary tasks in order to reduce the number of expensive labels required for training. We show that our approach leads to significant improvements over several state-of-the-art baselines on real-world ICU data and provide new insights on the importance of task selection and architectural choices in distantly supervised multitask learning.
Patrick Schwab, Emanuela Keller, Carl Muroi, David J. Mack, Christian Strässle, Walter Karlen
ICML6
2015 Estimation of Respiratory Rate From Photoplethysmographic Imaging Videos Compared to Pulse Oximetry
abstract
We present a study evaluating two respiratory rate estimation algorithms using videos obtained from placing a finger on the camera lens of a mobile phone. The two algorithms, based on Smart Fusion and empirical mode decomposition (EMD), consist of previously developed signal processing methods to detect features and extract respiratory induced variations in photoplethysmographic signals to estimate respiratory rate. With custom-built software on an Android phone, photoplethysmographic imaging videos were recorded from 19 healthy adults while breathing spontaneously at respiratory rates between 6 to 32 breaths/min. Signals from two pulse oximeters were simultaneously recorded to compare the algorithms' performance using mobile phone data and clinical data. Capnometry was recorded to obtain reference respiratory rates. Two hundred seventy-two recordings were analyzed. The Smart Fusion algorithm reported 39 recordings with insufficient respiratory information from the photoplethysmographic imaging data. Of the 232 remaining recordings, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 6 breaths/min was obtained. The RMSE for the pulse oximeter data was lower at 2.3 breaths/min. RMSE for the EMD method was higher throughout all data sources as, unlike the Smart Fusion, the EMD method did not screen for inconsistent results. The study showed that it is feasible to estimate respiratory rates by placing a finger on a mobile phone camera, but that it becomes increasingly challenging at respiratory rates greater than 20 breaths/min, independent of data source or algorithm tested.
Walter Karlen, Ainara Garde, Dorothy Myers, Cornie Scheffer, John Mark Ansermino, Guy Albert Dumont
IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informatics1