Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Priyamvada Sinvhal-Sharma
dblp:80/1559
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 38% Performance modeling and evaluation · 38% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance monitoring
parallel program monitoring |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Run-time monitoring of concurrent programs on the Cedar multiprocessor · SC 1990 |
Embedded and real-time systems
runtime monitoring |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Run-time monitoring of concurrent programs on the Cedar multiprocessor · SC 1990 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
multicore design |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Run-time monitoring of concurrent programs on the Cedar multiprocessor · SC 1990 |
Parallel and multicore computing
multiprocessor system |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Run-time monitoring of concurrent programs on the Cedar multiprocessor · SC 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
runtime tracing · 0.0distributed communication · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | Run-time monitoring of concurrent programs on the Cedar multiprocessorabstractA prototype run-time performance monitoring environment for the Cedar multiprocessor has been developed. The authors describe how the Cedar performance monitoring infrastructure is designed to achieve run-time monitoring and distributed communication of parallel program execution data. The underlying tracing procedures used in Cedar to gather execution data are described, and the procedures by which traces are dynamically off-loaded from the Cedar system and sent to remote processes are explained. The application of these tools to capture and visualize matrix data from an application at run-time is discussed. Finally, results regarding the performance of the run-time monitoring system in in terms of execution data bandwidth and program perturbation are presented.> Allen D. Malony, Michael W. Berry, Priyamvada Sinvhal-Sharma |
SC | 4 |