Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marianne Baudinet

dblp:80/2833 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Logic in computer science · 92% Computational complexity · 8%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Programming languages and type systems · 72% Program verification · 28%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data models and query languages · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Logic in computer science
temporal logic
0.021995
On the Expressiveness of Temporal Logic Programming · Inf. Comput. 1995
Temporal Logic Programming is Complete and Expressive · POPL 1989
Logic in computer science › temporal logic
temporal logic programming
0.021995
On the Expressiveness of Temporal Logic Programming · Inf. Comput. 1995
Temporal Logic Programming is Complete and Expressive · POPL 1989
Programming languages and type systems
logic programming
0.011995
On the Expressiveness of Temporal Logic Programming · Inf. Comput. 1995
Data models and query languages › query language
temporal query language
0.011991
On the Representation of Infinite Temporal Data and Queries · PODS 1991
Logic in computer science
proof theory
0.011989
Temporal Logic Programming is Complete and Expressive · POPL 1989
Computational complexity › proof complexity
resolution
0.011989
Temporal Logic Programming is Complete and Expressive · POPL 1989
Program verification › correctness proof
partial correctness
0.011988
Proving Termination Properties of Prolog Programs: A Semantic Approach · LICS 1988
Logic in computer science › logic programming › logic programming semantics
fixpoint semantics
0.011988
Proving Termination Properties of Prolog Programs: A Semantic Approach · LICS 1988
Logic in computer science
logic programming
0.011988
Proving Termination Properties of Prolog Programs: A Semantic Approach · LICS 1988
Logic in computer science › logic programming
prolog
0.011988
Proving Termination Properties of Prolog Programs: A Semantic Approach · LICS 1988
Logic in computer science
semantics
0.011988
Proving Termination Properties of Prolog Programs: A Semantic Approach · LICS 1988
Logic in computer science › term rewriting
termination
0.011988
Proving Termination Properties of Prolog Programs: A Semantic Approach · LICS 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structural induction · 0.0fixpoint induction · 0.0herbrand models · 0.0fixpoint semantics · 0.0completeness proof · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Constraint-Generating Dependencies
Marianne Baudinet, Jan Chomicki, Pierre Wolper
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
1995 Constraint-Generating Dependencies
Marianne Baudinet, Jan Chomicki, Pierre Wolper
ICDT1
1995 On the Expressiveness of Temporal Logic Programming
Marianne Baudinet
Inf. Comput.1
1991 On the Representation of Infinite Temporal Data and Queries
abstract
peer reviewed
Marianne Baudinet, Marc Niézette, Pierre Wolper
PODS1
1989 Temporal Logic Programming is Complete and Expressive
abstract
This paper addresses semantic and expressiveness issues for temporal logic programming and in particular for the TEMPLOG language proposed by Abadi and Manna. Two equivalent formulations of TEMPLOG's declarative semantics are given: in terms of a minimal Herbrand model and in terms of a least fixpoint. By relating these semantics to TEMPLOG's operational semantics, we prove the completeness of the resolution proof system underlying TEMPLOG's execution mechanism. To study TEMPLOG's expressiveness, we consider its propositional version. We show how propositional TEMPLOG programs can be translated into a temporal fixpoint calculus and prove that they can express essentially all regular properties of sequences.
Marianne Baudinet
POPL1
1988 Proving Termination Properties of Prolog Programs: A Semantic Approach
abstract
A method for proving termination properties of Prolog programs including program with cuts. Programs are viewed as functions mapping goals into finite or infinite sequences of answer substitutions. Associated with each program is a system of functional equations, the least fixed point of which is the meaning of the program. Various termination or nontermination properties as well as partial correctness statements can then be proved by reasoning with the program equations and using fixpoint or structural induction. The method is amenable to automatic implementation.>
Marianne Baudinet
LICS1