Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gu-In Kwon

dblp:80/4212 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
4 papers
Transport protocols and congestion control · 44% Internet architecture and protocols · 40% Content delivery and video streaming · 16%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › multicast
layered multicast
0.122006
Fine-grained layered multicast with STAIR · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2006
Smooth Multirate Multicast Congestion Control · INFOCOM 2003
Transport protocols and congestion control › congestion management
multicast congestion control
0.122004
Leveraging single rate schemes in multiple rate multicast congestion control design · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2004
Smooth Multirate Multicast Congestion Control · INFOCOM 2003
Content delivery and video streaming
overlay multicast
0.012004
ROMA: Reliable Overlay Multicast with Loosely Coupled TCP Connections · INFOCOM 2004
Transport protocols and congestion control
TCP
0.012004
ROMA: Reliable Overlay Multicast with Loosely Coupled TCP Connections · INFOCOM 2004
Internet architecture and protocols
multicast
0.012006
Fine-grained layered multicast with STAIR · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

layered multicast · 0.0forward error correction · 0.0equation-based analysis · 0.0TCP-friendly congestion control · 0.0equation-based congestion control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Fine-grained layered multicast with STAIR
John W. Byers, Gu-In Kwon, Michael Luby, Michael Mitzenmacher
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.2
2004 ROMA: Reliable Overlay Multicast with Loosely Coupled TCP Connections
abstract
We consider the problem of architecting a reliable content delivery system across an overlay network using TCP connections as the transport primitive. We first argue that natural designs based on store-and-forward principles that tightly couple TCP connections at intermediate end-systems impose fundamental performance limitations, such as dragging down all transfer rates in the system to the rate of the slowest receiver. In contrast, the ROMA architecture we propose incorporates the use of loosely coupled TCP connections together with fast forward error correction techniques to deliver a scalable solution that better accommodates a set of heterogeneous receivers. The methods we develop establish chains of TCP connections, whose expected performance we analyze through equation-based methods. We validate our analytical findings and evaluate the performance of our ROMA architecture using a prototype implementation via extensive Internet experimentation across the PlanetLab distributed testbed.
Gu-In Kwon, John W. Byers
INFOCOM1
2004 Leveraging single rate schemes in multiple rate multicast congestion control design
abstract
A significant impediment to deployment of multicast services is the daunting technical complexity of developing, testing and validating congestion control protocols fit for wide-area deployment. Protocols such as pragmatic general multicast congestion control (pgmcc) and TCP-friendly multicast congestion control (TFMCC) have recently made considerable progress on the single rate case, i.e., where one dynamic reception rate is maintained for all receivers in the session. However, these protocols have limited applicability, since scaling to session sizes beyond tens of participants with heterogeneous available bandwidth necessitates the use of multiple rate protocols. Unfortunately, while existing multiple rate protocols exhibit better scalability, they are both less mature than single rate protocols and suffer from high complexity. We propose a new approach to multiple rate congestion control that leverages proven single rate congestion control methods by orchestrating an ensemble of independently controlled single rate sessions. We describe a new multiple rate congestion control algorithm for layered multicast sessions that employs a single rate multicast congestion control as the primary underlying control mechanism for each layer. Our new scheme combines the benefits of single rate congestion control with the scalability and flexibility of multiple rates to provide a sound multiple rate multicast congestion control policy.
Gu-In Kwon, John W. Byers
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.1
2003 Smooth Multirate Multicast Congestion Control
abstract
A significant impediment to deployment of multicast services is the daunting technical complexity of developing, testing and validating congestion control protocols fit for wide-area deployment. Protocols such as pgmcc and TFMCC have recently made considerable progress on the single rate case, i.e. where one dynamic reception rate is maintained for all receivers in the session. However, these protocols have limited applicability, since scaling to session sizes beyond tens of participants necessitates the use of multiple rate protocols. Unfortunately, while existing multiple rate protocols exhibit better scalability, they are both less mature than single rate protocols and suffer from high complexity. We propose a new approach to multiple rate congestion control that leverages proven single rate congestion control methods by orchestrating an ensemble of independently controlled single rate sessions. We describe SMCC, a new multiple rate equation-based congestion control algorithm for layered multicast sessions that employs TFMCC as the primary underlying control mechanism for each layer. SMCC combines the benefits of TFMCC (smooth rate control, equation-based TCP friendliness) with the scalability and flexibility of multiple rates to provide a sound multiple rate multicast congestion control policy.
Gu-In Kwon, John W. Byers
INFOCOM1