Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Scott Morris 0001

dblp:80/4908 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 50% Generative modeling · 50%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 77% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
aerial image analysis
0.212013
A Statistical Model for Recreational Trails in Aerial Images · CVPR 2013
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
probabilistic image models
0.212013
A Statistical Model for Recreational Trails in Aerial Images · CVPR 2013
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.112008
Finding trails · CVPR 2008
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image analysis
aerial image analysis
0.012008
Finding trails · CVPR 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

texton learning · 0.2superpixel segmentation · 0.2stochastic dijkstra · 0.2trail sampling · 0.1statistical learning · 0.1splitting heuristic · 0.1dijkstra's algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 A Statistical Model for Recreational Trails in Aerial Images
abstract
We present a statistical model of aerial images of recreational trails, and a method to infer trail routes in such images. We learn a set of text ons describing the images, and use them to divide the image into super-pixels represented by their text on. We then learn, for each text on, the frequency of generating on-trail and off-trail pixels, and the direction of trail through on-trail pixels. From these, we derive an image likelihood function. We combine that with a prior model of trail length and smoothness, yielding a posterior distribution for trails, given an image. We search for good values of this posterior using a novel stochastic variation of Dijkstra's algorithm. Our experiments, on trail images and ground truth collected in the western continental USA, show substantial improvement over those of the previous best trail-finding method.
Andrew Predoehl, Scott Morris 0001, Kobus Barnard
CVPR2
2008 Finding trails
abstract
We present a statistical learning approach for finding recreational trails in aerial images. While the problem of recognizing relatively straight and well defined roadways in digital images has been well studied in the literature, the more difficult problem of extracting trails has received no attention. However, trails and rough roads are less likely to be adequately mapped, and change more rapidly over time. Automated tools for finding trails will be useful to cartographers, recreational users and governments. In addition, the methods developed here are applicable to the more general problem of finding linear structure. Our approach combines local estimates for image pixel trail probabilities with the global constraint that such pixels must link together to form a path. For the local part, we present results using three classification techniques. To construct a global solution (a trail) from these probabilities, we propose a global cost function that includes both global probability and path length. We show that the addition of a length term significantly improves trail finding ability. However, computing the optimal trail becomes intractable as known dynamic programming methods do not apply. Thus we describe a new splitting heuristic based on Dijkstra's algorithm. We then further improve upon the results with a trail sampling scheme. We test our approach on 500 challenging images along the 2500 mile continental divide mountain bike trail, where assumptions prevalent in the road literature are violated.
Scott Morris 0001, Kobus Barnard
CVPR1