Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ulf Hermjakob

dblp:80/5317 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
16ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 31% Multi-agent systems · 26% Machine translation · 25%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
strategic interaction
0.812024
More Victories, Less Cooperation: Assessing Cicero's Diplomacy Play · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.422015
Parsing English into Abstract Meaning Representation Using Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Aligning English Strings with Abstract Meaning Representation Graphs · EMNLP 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.212016
Extracting Biomolecular Interactions Using Semantic Parsing of Biomedical Text · AAAI 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining
0.212016
Extracting Biomolecular Interactions Using Semantic Parsing of Biomedical Text · AAAI 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.212024
More Victories, Less Cooperation: Assessing Cicero's Diplomacy Play · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
abstract meaning representation parsing
0.212015
Parsing English into Abstract Meaning Representation Using Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › syntax-based machine translation
string-to-tree translation
0.212015
Parsing English into Abstract Meaning Representation Using Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
syntax-based machine translation
0.212015
Parsing English into Abstract Meaning Representation Using Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
semantic alignment
0.212014
Aligning English Strings with Abstract Meaning Representation Graphs · EMNLP 2014
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment
0.112009
Improved Word Alignment with Statistics and Linguistic Heuristics · EMNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
named entity translation
0.112008
Name Translation in Statistical Machine Translation - Learning When to Transliterate · ACL 2008
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
transliteration
0.112008
Name Translation in Statistical Machine Translation - Learning When to Transliterate · ACL 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
abstract meaning representation
0.112016
Extracting Biomolecular Interactions Using Semantic Parsing of Biomedical Text · AAAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
semantic representation
0.112016
Extracting Biomolecular Interactions Using Semantic Parsing of Biomedical Text · AAAI 2016
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.022009
Improved Word Alignment with Statistics and Linguistic Heuristics · EMNLP 2009
Learning Parse and Translation Decisions from Examples with Rich Context · ACL 1997
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › transition-based parsing
shift-reduce parsing
0.011997
Learning Parse and Translation Decisions from Examples with Rich Context · ACL 1997
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.011997
Learning Parse and Translation Decisions from Examples with Rich Context · ACL 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical analysis · 0.8game simulation · 0.8semantic parsing · 0.5graph kernel learning · 0.5dependency structure · 0.5AMR · 0.5syntax-based machine translation · 0.2language model · 0.2expectation-maximization · 0.2AMR linearization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 More Victories, Less Cooperation: Assessing Cicero's Diplomacy Play
abstract
Wichayaporn Wongkamjan, Feng Gu, Yanze Wang, Ulf Hermjakob, Jonathan May, Brandon M. Stewart, Jonathan K. Kummerfeld, Denis Peskoff, Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Wichayaporn Wongkamjan, Ulf Hermjakob, Jonathan May, Brandon M. Stewart, Jonathan K. Kummerfeld, Denis Peskoff, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber
ACL (1)4
2018 AMR Beyond the Sentence: the Multi-sentence AMR corpus
abstract
There are few corpora that endeavor to represent the semantic content of entire documents. We present a corpus that accomplishes one way of capturing document level semantics, by annotating coreference and similar phenomena (bridging and implicit roles) on top of gold Abstract Meaning Representations of sentence-level semantics. We present a new corpus of this annotation, with analysis of its quality, alongside a plausible baseline for comparison. It is hoped that this Multi-Sentence AMR corpus (MS-AMR) may become a feasible method for developing rich representations of document meaning, useful for tasks such as information extraction and question answering.
Tim O'Gorman, Michael Regan, Kira Griffitt, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Martha Palmer
COLING4
2018 Abstract Meaning Representation of Constructions: The More We Include, the Better the Representation
Claire Bonial, Bianca Badarau, Kira Griffitt, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Tim O'Gorman, Martha Palmer, Nathan Schneider 0001
LREC4
2018 Incident-Driven Machine Translation and Name Tagging for Low-resource Languages
Ulf Hermjakob, Daniel Marcu, Jonathan May, Sabrina J. Mielke, Nima Pourdamghani, Michael Pust, Kevin Knight, Tomer Levinboim, Kenton Murray, David Chiang 0001, Boliang Zhang, Xiaoman Pan, Di Lu 0003, Heng Ji 0001
Mach. Transl.1
2017 Team ELISA System for DARPA LORELEI Speech Evaluation 2016
Pavlos Papadopoulos, Ruchir Travadi, Colin Vaz, Nikos Malandrakis, Ulf Hermjakob, Nima Pourdamghani, Michael Pust, Boliang Zhang, Xiaoman Pan, Di Lu 0003, Ondrej Glembek, Murali Karthick Baskar, Martin Karafiát, Lukás Burget, Mark Hasegawa-Johnson, Heng Ji 0001, Jonathan May, Kevin Knight, Shri Narayanan
INTERSPEECH5
2016 Extracting Biomolecular Interactions Using Semantic Parsing of Biomedical Text
abstract
We advance the state of the art in biomolecular interaction extraction with three contributions: (i) We show that deep, Abstract Meaning Representations (AMR) significantly improve the accuracy of a biomolecular interaction extraction system when compared to a baseline that relies solely on surface- and syntax-based features; (ii) In contrast with previous approaches that infer relations on a sentence-by-sentence basis, we expand our framework to enable consistent predictions over sets of sentences (documents); (iii) We further modify and expand a graph kernel learning framework to enable concurrent exploitation of automatically induced AMR (semantic) and dependency structure (syntactic) representations. Our experiments show that our approach yields interaction extraction systems that are more robust in environments where there is a significant mismatch between training and test conditions.
Sahil Garg, Aram Galstyan, Ulf Hermjakob, Daniel Marcu
AAAI3
2016 Generating English from Abstract Meaning Representations
abstract
We present a method for generating English sentences from Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) graphs, exploiting a parallel corpus of AMRs and English sentences.We treat AMR-to-English generation as phrase-based machine translation (PBMT).We introduce a method that learns to linearize tokens of AMR graphs into an English-like order.Our linearization reduces the amount of distortion in PBMT and increases generation quality.We report a Bleu score of 26.8 on the standard AMR/English test set.
Nima Pourdamghani, Kevin Knight, Ulf Hermjakob
INLG3
2016 Abstract Meaning Representations as Linked Data
Gully A. P. C. Burns, Ulf Hermjakob, José Luis Ambite
ISWC (2)2
2015 Parsing English into Abstract Meaning Representation Using Syntax-Based Machine Translation
abstract
We present a parser for Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR).We treat Englishto-AMR conversion within the framework of string-to-tree, syntax-based machine translation (SBMT).To make this work, we transform the AMR structure into a form suitable for the mechanics of SBMT and useful for modeling.We introduce an AMR-specific language model and add data and features drawn from semantic resources.Our resulting AMR parser significantly improves upon state-of-the-art results.
Michael Pust, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu, Jonathan May
EMNLP2
2015 Unsupervised Entity Linking with Abstract Meaning Representation
abstract
Xiaoman Pan, Taylor Cassidy, Ulf Hermjakob, Heng Ji, Kevin Knight. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2015.
Xiaoman Pan, Taylor Cassidy, Ulf Hermjakob, Heng Ji 0001, Kevin Knight
HLT-NAACL3
2014 Aligning English Strings with Abstract Meaning Representation Graphs
abstract
We align pairs of English sentences and corresponding Abstract Meaning Repre-sentations (AMR), at the token level. Such alignments will be useful for downstream extraction of semantic interpretation and generation rules. Our method involves linearizing AMR structures and perform-ing symmetrized EM training. We obtain 86.5 % and 83.1 % alignment F score on de-velopment and test sets. 1
Nima Pourdamghani, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight
EMNLP3
2009 Improved Word Alignment with Statistics and Linguistic Heuristics
Ulf Hermjakob
EMNLP1
2008 Name Translation in Statistical Machine Translation - Learning When to Transliterate
Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Hal Daumé III
ACL1
2002 Using Knowledge to Facilitate Factoid Answer Pinpointing
Eduard H. Hovy, Ulf Hermjakob, Chin-Yew Lin, Deepak Ravichandran
COLING2
2002 Translation with Scarce Bilingual Resources
Yaser Al-Onaizan, Ulrich Germann, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Philipp Koehn, Daniel Marcu, Kenji Yamada
Mach. Transl.3
1997 Learning Parse and Translation Decisions from Examples with Rich Context
abstract
We present a knowledge and context-based system for parsing and translating natural language and evaluate it on sentences from the Wall Street Journal. Applying machine learning techniques, the system uses parse action examples acquired under supervision to generate a deterministic shift-reduce parser in the form of a decision structure. It relies heavily on context, as encoded in features which describe the morphological, syntactic, semantic and other aspects of a given parse state.
Ulf Hermjakob, Raymond J. Mooney
ACL1