Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sean McWilliam
dblp:80/6507
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-3148-0428ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering
correlation analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Validation of alternative methods of data normalization in gene co-expression studies · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene co-expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Validation of alternative methods of data normalization in gene co-expression studies · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Validation of alternative methods of data normalization in gene co-expression studies · Bioinform. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixed-model normalization · 0.1cross-validation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Information compression exploits patterns of genome composition to discriminate populations and highlight regions of evolutionary interestabstractBACKGROUND: Genomic information allows population relatedness to be inferred and selected genes to be identified. Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray (SNP-chip) data, a proxy for genome composition, contains patterns in allele order and proportion. These patterns can be quantified by compression efficiency (CE). In principle, the composition of an entire genome can be represented by a CE number quantifying allele representation and order. RESULTS: We applied a compression algorithm (DEFLATE) to genome-wide high-density SNP data from 4,155 human, 1,800 cattle, 1,222 sheep, 81 dogs and 49 mice samples. All human ethnic groups can be clustered by CE and the clusters recover phylogeography based on traditional fixation index (FST) analyses. CE analysis of other mammals results in segregation by breed or species, and is sensitive to admixture and past effective population size. This clustering is a consequence of individual patterns such as runs of homozygosity. Intriguingly, a related approach can also be used to identify genomic loci that show population-specific CE segregation. A high resolution CE 'sliding window' scan across the human genome, organised at the population level, revealed genes known to be under evolutionary pressure. These include SLC24A5 (European and Gujarati Indian skin pigmentation), HERC2 (European eye color), LCT (European and Maasai milk digestion) and EDAR (Asian hair thickness). We also identified a set of previously unidentified loci with high population-specific CE scores including the chromatin remodeler SCMH1 in Africans and EDA2R in Asians. Closer inspection reveals that these prioritised genomic regions do not correspond to simple runs of homozygosity but rather compositionally complex regions that are shared by many individuals of a given population. Unlike FST, CE analyses do not require ab initio population comparisons and are amenable to the hemizygous X chromosome. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude with a discussion of the implications of CE for a complex systems science view of genome evolution. CE allows one to clearly visualise the evolution of individual genomes and populations through a formal, mathematically-rigorous information space. Overall, CE makes a set of biological predictions, some of which are unique and await functional validation. Nicholas J. Hudson 0001, Laercio R. Porto-Neto, James Kijas, Sean McWilliam, Ryan J. Taft, Antonio Reverter |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2013 | Next-generation sequencing: a challenge to meet the increasing demand for training workshops in AustraliaabstractThe widespread adoption of high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology among the Australian life science research community is highlighting an urgent need to up-skill biologists in tools required for handling and analysing their NGS data. There is currently a shortage of cutting-edge bioinformatics training courses in Australia as a consequence of a scarcity of skilled trainers with time and funding to develop and deliver training courses. To address this, a consortium of Australian research organizations, including Bioplatforms Australia, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and the Australian Bioinformatics Network, have been collaborating with EMBL-EBI training team. A group of Australian bioinformaticians attended the train-the-trainer workshop to improve training skills in developing and delivering bioinformatics workshop curriculum. A 2-day NGS workshop was jointly developed to provide hands-on knowledge and understanding of typical NGS data analysis workflows. The road show-style workshop was successfully delivered at five geographically distant venues in Australia using the newly established Australian NeCTAR Research Cloud. We highlight the challenges we had to overcome at different stages from design to delivery, including the establishment of an Australian bioinformatics training network and the computing infrastructure and resource development. A virtual machine image, workshop materials and scripts for configuring a machine with workshop contents have all been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. This means participants continue to have convenient access to an environment they had become familiar and bioinformatics trainers are able to access and reuse these resources. Nathan S. Watson-Haigh, Catherine A. Shang, Matthias Haimel, Myrto Kostadima, Remco Loos, Nandan Deshpande, Konsta Duesing, Annette McGrath, Sean McWilliam, Simon Michnowicz, Paula Moolhuijzen, Steve Quenette, Jerico Revote, Sonika Tyagi, Maria Victoria Schneider |
Briefings Bioinform. | 10 |
| 2005 | Validation of alternative methods of data normalization in gene co-expression studiesabstractMOTIVATION: Clusters of genes encoding proteins with related functions, or in the same regulatory network, often exhibit expression patterns that are correlated over a large number of conditions. Protein associations and gene regulatory networks can be modelled from expression data. We address the question of which of several normalization methods is optimal prior to computing the correlation of the expression profiles between every pair of genes. RESULTS: We use gene expression data from five experiments with a total of 78 hybridizations and 23 diverse conditions. Nine methods of data normalization are explored based on all possible combinations of normalization techniques according to between and within gene and experiment variation. We compare the resulting empirical distribution of gene x gene correlations with the expectations and apply cross-validation to test the performance of each method in predicting accurate functional annotation. We conclude that normalization methods based on mixed-model equations are optimal. Antonio Reverter, Wes Barris, Sean McWilliam, Keren A. Byrne, Yong H. Wang, Siok-Hwee Tan, Nicholas J. Hudson 0001, Brian P. Dalrymple |
Bioinform. | 3 |