Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qunli Li

dblp:80/6571 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 30% Learning theory · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
deep ensembles
0.812024
Sharpness-diversity tradeoff: improving flat ensembles with SharpBalance · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization
0.812024
Sharpness-diversity tradeoff: improving flat ensembles with SharpBalance · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
Sharpness-diversity tradeoff: improving flat ensembles with SharpBalance · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.212024
Sharpness-diversity tradeoff: improving flat ensembles with SharpBalance · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

theoretical analysis · 0.8sharpness-aware minimization · 0.8ensemble training · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Sharpness-diversity tradeoff: improving flat ensembles with SharpBalance
abstract
Recent studies on deep ensembles have identified the sharpness of the local minima of individual learners and the diversity of the ensemble members as key factors in improving test-time performance. Building on this, our study investigates the interplay between sharpness and diversity within deep ensembles, illustrating their crucial role in robust generalization to both in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) data. We discover a trade-off between sharpness and diversity: minimizing the sharpness in the loss landscape tends to diminish the diversity of individual members within the ensemble, adversely affecting the ensemble's improvement. The trade-off is justified through our rigorous theoretical analysis and verified empirically through extensive experiments. To address the issue of reduced diversity, we introduce SharpBalance, a novel training approach that balances sharpness and diversity within ensembles. Theoretically, we show that our training strategy achieves a better sharpness-diversity trade-off. Empirically, we conducted comprehensive evaluations in various data sets (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, TinyImageNet) and showed that SharpBalance not only effectively improves the sharpness-diversity trade-off but also significantly improves ensemble performance in ID and OOD scenarios.
Haiquan Lu, Xiaotian Liu, Yefan Zhou, Qunli Li, Kurt Keutzer, Michael W. Mahoney, Yujun Yan, Huanrui Yang, Yaoqing Yang 0002
NeurIPS4