Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robin M. E. Swezey

dblp:80/9054 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.512021
PiRank: Scalable Learning To Rank via Differentiable Sorting · NeurIPS 2021
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
listwise ranking
0.512021
PiRank: Scalable Learning To Rank via Differentiable Sorting · NeurIPS 2021
Information retrieval
ranking
0.512021
PiRank: Scalable Learning To Rank via Differentiable Sorting · NeurIPS 2021
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.512021
PiRank: Scalable Learning To Rank via Differentiable Sorting · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temperature relaxation · 0.5neuralsort · 0.5divide-and-conquer · 0.5differentiable sorting · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 PiRank: Scalable Learning To Rank via Differentiable Sorting
abstract
A key challenge with machine learning approaches for ranking is the gap between the performance metrics of interest and the surrogate loss functions that can be optimized with gradient-based methods. This gap arises because ranking metrics typically involve a sorting operation which is not differentiable w.r.t. the model parameters. Prior works have proposed surrogates that are loosely related to ranking metrics or simple smoothed versions thereof, and often fail to scale to real-world applications. We propose PiRank, a new class of differentiable surrogates for ranking, which employ a continuous, temperature-controlled relaxation to the sorting operator based on NeuralSort [1]. We show that PiRank exactly recovers the desired metrics in the limit of zero temperature and further propose a divide-and-conquer extension that scales favorably to large list sizes, both in theory and practice. Empirically, we demonstrate the role of larger list sizes during training and show that PiRank significantly improves over comparable approaches on publicly available Internet-scale learning-to-rank benchmarks.
Robin M. E. Swezey, Aditya Grover, Bruno Charron, Stefano Ermon
NeurIPS1
2018 Large-scale recommendation for portfolio optimization
abstract
Individual investors are now massively using online brokers to trade stocks with convenient interfaces and low fees, albeit losing the advice and personalization traditionally provided by full-service brokers. We frame the problem faced by online brokers of replicating this level of service in a low-cost and automated manner for a very large number of users. Because of the care required in recommending financial products, we focus on a risk-management approach tailored to each user's portfolio and risk profile. We show that our hybrid approach, based on Modern Portfolio Theory and Collaborative Filtering, provides a sound and effective solution. The method is applicable to stocks as well as other financial assets, and can be easily combined with various financial forecasting models. We validate our proposal by comparing it with several baselines in a domain expert-based study.
Robin M. E. Swezey, Bruno Charron
RecSys1
2015 Recommending Short-lived Dynamic Packages for Golf Booking Services
abstract
We introduce an approach to recommending short-lived dynamic packages for golf booking services. Two challenges are addressed in this work. The first is the short life of the items, which puts the system in a state of a permanent cold start. The second is the uninformative nature of the package attributes, which makes clustering or figuring latent packages challenging. Although such settings are fairly pervasive, they have not been studied in traditional recommendation research, and there is thus a call for original approaches for recommender systems. In this paper, we introduce a hybrid method that leverages user analysis and its relation to the packages, as well as package pricing and environmental analysis, and traditional collaborative filtering. The proposed approach achieved appreciable improvement in precision compared with baselines
Robin M. E. Swezey, Young-joo Chung
CIKM1
2011 Intelligent Page Recommender Agents: Real-Time Content Delivery for Articles and Pages Related to Similar Topics
Robin M. E. Swezey, Shun Shiramatsu, Tadachika Ozono, Toramatsu Shintani
IEA/AIE (2)1
2010 Architecture for Automated Search and Negotiation in Affiliation among Community Websites and Blogs
Robin M. E. Swezey, Masato Nakamura, Shun Shiramatsu, Tadachika Ozono, Toramatsu Shintani
IEA/AIE (2)1