Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dieter Kube
dblp:80/9984
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology
signaling network inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Analyzing synergistic and non-synergistic interactions in signalling pathways using Boolean Nested Effect Models · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems bioinformatics › pathway analysis
signaling pathway analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Analyzing synergistic and non-synergistic interactions in signalling pathways using Boolean Nested Effect Models · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Genomic data integration using guided clustering · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multi-omics data integration
genomic data integration |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Genomic data integration using guided clustering · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Genomic data integration using guided clustering · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
supervised clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Genomic data integration using guided clustering · Bioinform. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixed graphical models · 0.7imputation · 0.7nested effects models · 0.2boolean network · 0.2statistical simulation · 0.1clustering · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Quantitative modeling of signaling in aggressive B cell lymphoma unveils conserved core networkabstractB cell receptor (BCR) signaling is required for the survival and maturation of B cells and is deregulated in B cell lymphomas. While proximal BCR signaling is well studied, little is known about the crosstalk of downstream effector pathways, and a comprehensive quantitative network analysis of BCR signaling is missing. Here, we semi-quantitatively modelled BCR signaling in Burkitt lymphoma (BL) cells using systematically perturbed phosphorylation data of BL-2 and BL-41 cells. The models unveiled feedback and crosstalk structures in the BCR signaling network, including a negative crosstalk from p38 to MEK/ERK. The relevance of the crosstalk was verified for BCR and CD40 signaling in different BL cells and confirmed by global phosphoproteomics on ERK itself and known ERK target sites. Compared to the starting network, the trained network for BL-2 cells was better transferable to BL-41 cells. Moreover, the BL-2 network was also suited to model BCR signaling in Diffuse large B cell lymphoma cells lines with aberrant BCR signaling (HBL-1, OCI-LY3), indicating that BCR aberration does not cause a major downstream rewiring. Bertram Klinger, Isabel Rausch, Anja Sieber, Helmut Kutz, Vanessa Kruse, Marieluise Kirchner, Philipp Mertins, Arnd Kieser, Nils Blüthgen, Dieter Kube |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 10 |
| 2023 | Anomaly detection in mixed high-dimensional molecular dataabstractMOTIVATION: Mixed molecular data combines continuous and categorical features of the same samples, such as OMICS profiles with genotypes, diagnoses, or patient sex. Like all high-dimensional molecular data, it is prone to incorrect values that can stem from various sources for example the technical limitations of the measurement devices, errors in the sample preparation, or contamination. Most anomaly detection algorithms identify complete samples as outliers or anomalies. However, in most cases, not all measurements of those samples are erroneous but only a few one-dimensional features within the samples are incorrect. These one-dimensional data errors are continuous measurements that are either located outside or inside the normal ranges of their features but in both cases show atypical values given all other continuous and categorical features in the sample. Additionally, categorical anomalies can occur for example when the genotype or diagnosis was submitted wrongly. RESULTS: We introduce ADMIRE (Anomaly Detection using MIxed gRaphical modEls), a novel approach for the detection and correction of anomalies in mixed high-dimensional data. Hereby, we focus on the detection of single (one-dimensional) data errors in the categorical and continuous features of a sample. For that the joint distribution of continuous and categorical features is learned by mixed graphical models, anomalies are detected by the difference between measured and model-based estimations and are corrected using imputation. We evaluated ADMIRE in simulation and by screening for anomalies in one of our own metabolic datasets. In simulation experiments, ADMIRE outperformed the state-of-the-art methods of Local Outlier Factor, stray, and Isolation Forest. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All data and code is available at https://github.com/spang-lab/adadmire. ADMIRE is implemented in a Python package called adadmire which can be found at https://pypi.org/project/adadmire. Lena Buck, Maren Feist, Philipp Schwarzfischer, Dieter Kube, Peter J. Oefner, Helena U. Zacharias, Michael Altenbuchinger, Katja Dettmer, Wolfram Gronwald, Rainer Spang |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2016 | Analyzing synergistic and non-synergistic interactions in signalling pathways using Boolean Nested Effect ModelsabstractMOTIVATION: Understanding the structure and interplay of cellular signalling pathways is one of the great challenges in molecular biology. Boolean Networks can infer signalling networks from observations of protein activation. In situations where it is difficult to assess protein activation directly, Nested Effect Models are an alternative. They derive the network structure indirectly from downstream effects of pathway perturbations. To date, Nested Effect Models cannot resolve signalling details like the formation of signalling complexes or the activation of proteins by multiple alternative input signals. Here we introduce Boolean Nested Effect Models (B-NEM). B-NEMs combine the use of downstream effects with the higher resolution of signalling pathway structures in Boolean Networks. RESULTS: We show that B-NEMs accurately reconstruct signal flows in simulated data. Using B-NEM we then resolve BCR signalling via PI3K and TAK1 kinases in BL2 lymphoma cell lines. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R code is available at https://github.com/MartinFXP/B-NEM (github). The BCR signalling dataset is available at the GEO database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) through accession number GSE68761. CONTACT: [email protected], [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Martin Pirkl, Elisabeth Hand, Dieter Kube, Rainer Spang |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2011 | Genomic data integration using guided clusteringabstractMOTIVATION: In biomedical research transcriptomic, proteomic or metabolomic profiles of patient samples are often combined with genomic profiles from experiments in cell lines or animal models. Integrating experimental data with patient data is still a challenging task due to the lack of tailored statistical tools. RESULTS: Here we introduce guided clustering, a new data integration strategy that combines experimental and clinical high-throughput data. Guided clustering identifies sets of genes that stand out in experimental data while at the same time display coherent expression in clinical data. We report on two potential applications: The integration of clinical microarray data with (i) genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation assays and (ii) with cell perturbation assays. Unlike other analysis strategies, guided clustering does not analyze the two datasets sequentially but instead in a single joint analysis. In a simulation study and in several biological applications, guided clustering performs favorably when compared with sequential analysis approaches. AVAILABILITY: Guided clustering is available as a R-package from http://compdiag.uni-regensburg.de/software/guidedClustering.shtml. Documented R code of all our analysis is included in the Supplementary Materials. All newly generated data are available at the GEO database (GSE29700). CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Matthias Maneck, Alexandra Schrader, Dieter Kube, Rainer Spang |
Bioinform. | 3 |