Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antti Hyttinen

dblp:81/10620 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
24ranked-venue papers
10as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-6649-3229ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 22 · 10 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 91% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 6% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 3%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Mathematical optimization · 42% Automated reasoning and model checking · 42% Computational complexity · 17%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
1.232020
Towards Scalable Bayesian Learning of Causal DAGs · NeurIPS 2020
A Bayesian Approach for Estimating Causal Effects from Observational Data · AAAI 2020
Identifying Causal Effects via Context-specific Independence Relations · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal effect estimation
0.922020
Towards Scalable Bayesian Learning of Causal DAGs · NeurIPS 2020
A Bayesian Approach for Estimating Causal Effects from Observational Data · AAAI 2020
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
maximum satisfiability
0.622018
Reduced Cost Fixing for Maximum Satisfiability · IJCAI 2018
A Core-Guided Approach to Learning Optimal Causal Graphs · IJCAI 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network
0.412020
Towards Scalable Bayesian Learning of Causal DAGs · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › structure learning
bayesian network structure learning
0.412020
A Bayesian Approach for Estimating Causal Effects from Observational Data · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery
0.432019
Experiment selection for causal discovery · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013
Learning linear cyclic causal models with latent variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012
Identifying Causal Effects via Context-specific Independence Relations · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal effect identification
0.412019
Identifying Causal Effects via Context-specific Independence Relations · NeurIPS 2019
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.312018
Reduced Cost Fixing for Maximum Satisfiability · IJCAI 2018
Automated reasoning and model checking
implicit hitting set
0.312018
Reduced Cost Fixing for Maximum Satisfiability · IJCAI 2018
Mathematical optimization
integer programming
0.312018
Reduced Cost Fixing for Maximum Satisfiability · IJCAI 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
causal graph discovery
0.312017
A Core-Guided Approach to Learning Optimal Causal Graphs · IJCAI 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.312017
Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Branch and Bound · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › markov random field
markov network structure learning
0.312017
Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Branch and Bound · NIPS 2017
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.312017
Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Branch and Bound · NIPS 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › decision making under uncertainty
experiment selection
0.212013
Experiment selection for causal discovery · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal model
0.112012
Learning linear cyclic causal models with latent variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
cyclic causal models
0.112012
Learning linear cyclic causal models with latent variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › structure learning
graphical model structure learning
0.112017
Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Branch and Bound · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

do-calculus · 0.8context-specific independence · 0.8integer programming · 0.6dynamic programming · 0.6core-guided maximum satisfiability · 0.6branch-and-bound · 0.6markov chain monte carlo · 0.4linear gaussian model · 0.4bayesian linear regression · 0.4bayesian inference · 0.4DAG averaging · 0.4SAT solving · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Binary independent component analysis: a non-stationarity-based approach
abstract
We consider independent component analysis of binary data. While fundamental in practice, this case has been much less developed than ICA for continuous data. We start by assuming a linear mixing model in a continuous-valued latent space, followed by a binary observation model. Importantly, we assume that the sources are non-stationary; this is necessary since any non-Gaussianity would essentially be destroyed by the binarization. Interestingly, the model allows for closed-form likelihood by employing the cumulative distribution function of the multivariate Gaussian distribution. In stark contrast to the continuous-valued case, we prove non-identifiability of the model with few observed variables; our empirical results imply identifiability when the number of observed variables is higher. We present a practical method for binary ICA that uses only pairwise marginals, which are faster to compute than the full multivariate likelihood. Experiments give insight into the requirements for the number of observed variables, segments, and latent sources that allow the model to be estimated.
Antti Hyttinen, Vitória Barin Pacela, Aapo Hyvärinen
UAI1
2021 Maximal ancestral graph structure learning via exact search
abstract
Generalizing Bayesian networks, maximal ancestral graphs (MAGs) are a theoretically appealing model class for dealing with unobserved variables. Despite significant advances in developing practical exact algorithms for learning score-optimal Bayesian networks, practical exact algorithms for learning score-optimal MAGs have not been developed to-date. We develop here methodology for score-based structure learning of directed maximal ancestral graphs. In particular, we develop local score computation employing a linear Gaussian BIC score, as well as score pruning techniques, which are essential for exact structure learning approaches. Furthermore, employing dynamic programming and branch and bound, we present a first exact search algorithm that is guaranteed to find a globally optimal MAG for given local scores. The experiments show that our approach is able to find considerably higher scoring MAGs than previously proposed in-exact approaches.
Kari Rantanen, Antti Hyttinen, Matti Järvisalo
UAI2
2020 A Bayesian Approach for Estimating Causal Effects from Observational Data
abstract
We present a novel Bayesian method for the challenging task of estimating causal effects from passively observed data when the underlying causal DAG structure is unknown. To rigorously capture the inherent uncertainty associated with the estimate, our method builds a Bayesian posterior distribution of the linear causal effect, by integrating Bayesian linear regression and averaging over DAGs. For computing the exact posterior for all cause-effect variable pairs, we give an algorithm that runs in time O(3d d) for d variables, being feasible up to 20 variables. We also give a variant that computes the posterior probabilities of all pairwise ancestor relations within the same time complexity, significantly improving the fastest previous algorithm. In simulations, our Bayesian method outperforms previous methods in estimation accuracy, especially for small sample sizes. We further show that our method for effect estimation is well-adapted for detecting strong causal effects markedly deviating from zero, while our variant for computing posteriors of ancestor relations is the method of choice for detecting the mere existence of a causal relation. Finally, we apply our method on observational flow cytometry data, detecting several causal relations that concur with previous findings from experimental data.
Johan Pensar, Topi Talvitie, Antti Hyttinen, Mikko Koivisto
AAAI3
2020 Evaluating Decision Makers over Selectively Labelled Data: A Causal Modelling Approach
Riku Laine, Antti Hyttinen, Michael Mathioudakis
DS2
2020 Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Stochastic Local Search
abstract
Peer reviewed
Kari Rantanen, Antti Hyttinen, Matti Järvisalo
ECAI2
2020 Towards Scalable Bayesian Learning of Causal DAGs
abstract
We give methods for Bayesian inference of directed acyclic graphs, DAGs, and the induced causal effects from passively observed complete data. Our methods build on a recent Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme for learning Bayesian networks, which enables efficient approximate sampling from the graph posterior, provided that each node is assigned a small number K of candidate parents. We present algorithmic techniques to significantly reduce the space and time requirements, which make the use of substantially larger values of K feasible. Furthermore, we investigate the problem of selecting the candidate parents per node so as to maximize the covered posterior mass. Finally, we combine our sampling method with a novel Bayesian approach for estimating causal effects in linear Gaussian DAG models. Numerical experiments demonstrate the performance of our methods in detecting ancestor–descendant relations, and in causal effect estimation our Bayesian method is shown to outperform previous approaches.
Jussi Viinikka, Antti Hyttinen, Johan Pensar, Mikko Koivisto
NeurIPS2
2020 Discovering causal graphs with cycles and latent confounders: An exact branch-and-bound approach
Kari Rantanen, Antti Hyttinen, Matti Järvisalo
Int. J. Approx. Reason.2
2019 Identifying Causal Effects via Context-specific Independence Relations
abstract
Causal effect identification considers whether an interventional probability distribution can be uniquely determined from a passively observed distribution in a given causal structure. If the generating system induces context-specific independence (CSI) relations, the existing identification procedures and criteria based on do-calculus are inherently incomplete. We show that deciding causal effect non-identifiability is NP-hard in the presence of CSIs. Motivated by this, we design a calculus and an automated search procedure for identifying causal effects in the presence of CSIs. The approach is provably sound and it includes standard do-calculus as a special case. With the approach we can obtain identifying formulas that were unobtainable previously, and demonstrate that a small number of CSI-relations may be sufficient to turn a previously non-identifiable instance to identifiable.
Santtu Tikka, Antti Hyttinen, Juha Karvanen
NeurIPS2
2019 A logical approach to context-specific independence
Jukka Corander, Antti Hyttinen, Juha Kontinen, Johan Pensar, Jouko A. Väänänen
Ann. Pure Appl. Log.2
2018 Reduced Cost Fixing for Maximum Satisfiability
abstract
Maximum satisfiability (MaxSAT) offers a competitive approach to solving NP-hard real-world optimization problems. While state-of-the-art MaxSAT solvers rely heavily on Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers, a recent trend, brought on by MaxSAT solvers implementing the so-called implicit hitting set (IHS) approach, is to integrate techniques from the realm of integer programming (IP) into the solving process. This allows for making use of additional IP solving techniques to further speed up MaxSAT solving. In this line of work, we investigate the integration of the technique of reduced cost fixing from the IP realm into IHS solvers, and empirically show that reduced cost fixing considerable speeds up a state-of-the-art MaxSAT solver implementing the IHS approach.
Fahiem Bacchus, Antti Hyttinen, Matti Järvisalo, Paul Saikko
IJCAI2
2017 Reduced Cost Fixing in MaxSAT
Fahiem Bacchus, Antti Hyttinen, Matti Järvisalo, Paul Saikko
CP2
2017 A Core-Guided Approach to Learning Optimal Causal Graphs
abstract
Discovery of causal relations is an important part of data analysis. Recent exact Boolean optimization approaches enable tackling very general search spaces of causal graphs with feedback cycles and latent confounders, simultaneously obtaining high accuracy by optimally combining conflicting independence information in sample data. We propose several domain-specific techniques and integrate them into a core-guided maximum satisfiability solver, thereby speeding up current state of the art in exact search for causal graphs with cycles and latent confounders on simulated and real-world data.
Antti Hyttinen, Paul Saikko, Matti Järvisalo
IJCAI1
2017 Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Branch and Bound
abstract
We present a new algorithmic approach for the task of finding a chordal Markov network structure that maximizes a given scoring function. The algorithm is based on branch and bound and integrates dynamic programming for both domain pruning and for obtaining strong bounds for search-space pruning. Empirically, we show that the approach dominates in terms of running times a recent integer programming approach (and thereby also a recent constraint optimization approach) for the problem. Furthermore, our algorithm scales at times further with respect to the number of variables than a state-of-the-art dynamic programming algorithm for the problem, with the potential of reaching 20 variables and at the same time circumventing the tight exponential lower bounds on memory consumption of the pure dynamic programming approach.
Kari Rantanen, Antti Hyttinen, Matti Järvisalo
NIPS2
2017 A constraint optimization approach to causal discovery from subsampled time series data
Antti Hyttinen, Sergey M. Plis, Matti Järvisalo, Frederick Eberhardt, David Danks
Int. J. Approx. Reason.1
2016 A Logical Approach to Context-Specific Independence
Jukka Corander, Antti Hyttinen, Juha Kontinen, Johan Pensar, Jouko A. Väänänen
WoLLIC2
2015 Do-calculus when the True Graph Is Unknown
Antti Hyttinen, Frederick Eberhardt, Matti Järvisalo
UAI1
2015 Learning Optimal Chain Graphs with Answer Set Programming
Dag Sonntag, Matti Järvisalo, José M. Peña 0001, Antti Hyttinen
UAI4
2014 Constraint-based Causal Discovery: Conflict Resolution with Answer Set Programming
Antti Hyttinen, Frederick Eberhardt, Matti Järvisalo
UAI1
2013 Discovering Cyclic Causal Models with Latent Variables: A General SAT-Based Procedure
Antti Hyttinen, Patrik O. Hoyer, Frederick Eberhardt, Matti Järvisalo
UAI1
2013 Experiment selection for causal discovery
Antti Hyttinen, Frederick Eberhardt, Patrik O. Hoyer
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2012 Causal Discovery of Linear Cyclic Models from Multiple Experimental Data Sets with Overlapping Variables
Antti Hyttinen, Frederick Eberhardt, Patrik O. Hoyer
UAI1
2012 Learning linear cyclic causal models with latent variables
Antti Hyttinen, Frederick Eberhardt, Patrik O. Hoyer
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2011 Noisy-OR Models with Latent Confounding
Antti Hyttinen, Frederick Eberhardt, Patrik O. Hoyer
UAI1
2009 Bayesian Discovery of Linear Acyclic Causal Models
Patrik O. Hoyer, Antti Hyttinen
UAI2