EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Charles L. Cole
dblp:81/1322
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 77% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 23% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical pattern recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Automatic Solder Joint Inspection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988 |
Image and video processing
industrial inspection |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Automatic Solder Joint Inspection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
expert systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Automatic Solder Joint Inspection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
voting scheme · 0.0statistical pattern recognition · 0.0expert system · 0.0dimensionality reduction · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | Automatic Solder Joint InspectionabstractThe task of automating the visual inspection of pin-in-hole solder joints is addressed. Two approaches are explored: statistical pattern recognition and expert systems. An objective dimensionality-reduction method is used to enhance the performance of traditional statistical pattern recognition approaches by decorrelating feature data, generating feature weights, and reducing run-time computations. The expert system uses features in a manner more analogous to the visual clues that a human inspector would rely on for classification. Rules using these cues are developed, and a voting scheme is implemented to accumulate classification evidence incrementally. Both methods compared favorably with human inspector performance.> Sandra L. Bartlett, Paul J. Besl, Charles L. Cole, Ramesh Jain 0001, Debashish Mukherjee, Kurt D. Skifstad |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |