Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiaoyang Wang 0009

dblp:81/1832-9 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8471-4670ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 62% Trustworthy machine learning · 38%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › multimodal large language model
multimodal large language model evaluation
0.912025
FakeBench: Probing Explainable Fake Image Detection via Large Multimodal Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding › synthetic media detection
fake image detection
0.912025
FakeBench: Probing Explainable Fake Image Detection via Large Multimodal Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics › multimedia forensics
image forensics
0.912025
FakeBench: Probing Explainable Fake Image Detection via Large Multimodal Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
explainable detection
0.312025
FakeBench: Probing Explainable Fake Image Detection via Large Multimodal Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312025
FakeBench: Probing Explainable Fake Image Detection via Large Multimodal Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

human-in-the-loop annotation · 1.7large multimodal models · 0.9large multimodal model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DeepSelective: Interpretable prognosis prediction via feature selection and compression in EHR data
Ruochi Zhang, Xiaoyang Wang 0009, Qiong Zhou, Ziqi Deng, Yueying Wang, Yusi Fan, Jiale Zhang 0002, Lan Huang 0002, Chang Liu 0082, Fengfeng Zhou
Pattern Recognit.3
2025 Balancing Fairness and Performance in Healthcare AI: A Gradient Reconciliation Approach
Xiaoyang Wang 0009, Christopher C. Yang
AIME (1)1
2025 FakeBench: Probing Explainable Fake Image Detection via Large Multimodal Models
abstract
The ability to distinguish whether an image is generated by artificial intelligence (AI) is a crucial ingredient in human intelligence, usually accompanied by a complex and dialectical forensic and reasoning process. However, current fake image detection models and databases focus on binary classification without understandable explanations for the general populace. This weakens the credibility of authenticity judgment and may conceal potential model biases. Meanwhile, large multimodal models (LMMs) have exhibited immense vision-language capabilities on various tasks, bringing the potential for explainable fake image detection. Therefore, we pioneer the probe of LMMs for explainable fake image detection by presenting a multimodal database encompassing descriptions of textual authenticity, the FakeBench. For construction, we first introduce a fine-grained taxonomy of generative visual forgery concerning human perception, based on which we collect forgery descriptions in human natural language with a human-in-the-loop strategy. FakeBench examines LMMs with four evaluation criteria: detection, reasoning, explanation and fine-grained forgery analysis, to obtain deeper insights into image authenticity-relevant capabilities. Experiments on various LMMs confirm their merits and demerits in different aspects of fake image detection tasks. This research presents a paradigm shift towards transparency for the fake image detection area and reveals the need for greater emphasis on forensic elements in visual-language research and AI risk control. FakeBench will be available athttps://github.com/Yixuan423/FakeBench
Xuelin Liu, Xiaoyang Wang 0009, Bu-Sung Lee, Shiqi Wang 0001, Anderson Rocha 0001, Weisi Lin
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.3
2024 Explainable AI for Fair Sepsis Mortality Predictive Model
Chia-Hsuan Chang, Xiaoyang Wang 0009, Christopher C. Yang
AIME (2)2