Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Henry G. Goldberg
dblp:81/2941
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Data mining · 74% Data integration and cleaning · 14% Data models and query languages · 9% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Detecting insider threats in a real corporate database of computer usage activity · KDD 2013 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
graph anomaly detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Detecting insider threats in a real corporate database of computer usage activity · KDD 2013 |
Computational finance and economics
fraud detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detection · KDD 2007 |
Data integration and cleaning
data preprocessing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detection · KDD 2007 |
Computational finance and economics
financial fraud detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Using relational knowledge discovery to prevent securities fraud · KDD 2005 |
Data mining
relational learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Using relational knowledge discovery to prevent securities fraud · KDD 2005 |
Data mining › relational learning
statistical relational learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Using relational knowledge discovery to prevent securities fraud · KDD 2005 |
Data models and query languages › query language
visual query language |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Detecting insider threats in a real corporate database of computer usage activity · KDD 2013 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
statistical relational learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detection · KDD 2007 |
Data integration and cleaning
entity resolution |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Restructuring Databases for Knowledge Discovery by Consolidation and Link Formation · KDD 1995 |
Web and social media mining › social network analysis
link formation |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Restructuring Databases for Knowledge Discovery by Consolidation and Link Formation · KDD 1995 |
Data models and query languages › schema management
database restructuring |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Restructuring Databases for Knowledge Discovery by Consolidation and Link Formation · KDD 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical relational learning · 0.3normalization · 0.2link formation · 0.2temporal sequence analysis · 0.2statistical anomaly detection · 0.2dynamic graph processing · 0.2ranking models · 0.1ranking model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Detecting insider threats in a real corporate database of computer usage activityabstractThis paper reports on methods and results of an applied research project by a team consisting of SAIC and four universities to develop, integrate, and evaluate new approaches to detect the weak signals characteristic of insider threats on organizations' information systems. Our system combines structural and semantic information from a real corporate database of monitored activity on their users' computers to detect independently developed red team inserts of malicious insider activities. We have developed and applied multiple algorithms for anomaly detection based on suspected scenarios of malicious insider behavior, indicators of unusual activities, high-dimensional statistical patterns, temporal sequences, and normal graph evolution. Algorithms and representations for dynamic graph processing provide the ability to scale as needed for enterprise-level deployments on real-time data streams. We have also developed a visual language for specifying combinations of features, baselines, peer groups, time periods, and algorithms to detect anomalies suggestive of instances of insider threat behavior. We defined over 100 data features in seven categories based on approximately 5.5 million actions per day from approximately 5,500 users. We have achieved area under the ROC curve values of up to 0.979 and lift values of 65 on the top 50 user-days identified on two months of real data. Ted E. Senator, Henry G. Goldberg, Alex Memory, William T. Young, Bradley Rees, Robert Pierce, Daniel Huang 0003, Matthew Reardon, David A. Bader, Edmond Chow, Irfan A. Essa, Joshua Jones, Vinay Bettadapura, Polo Chau, Oded Green, Oguz Kaya, Anita Zakrzewska, Erica Briscoe, Rudolph Louis Mappus IV, Robert McColl, Lora Weiss, Thomas G. Dietterich, Alan Fern, Weng-Keen Wong, Shubhomoy Das, Andrew Emmott, Jed Irvine, Jay-Yoon Lee, Danai Koutra, Christos Faloutsos, Daniel D. Corkill, Lisa Friedland, Amanda Gentzel, David D. Jensen |
KDD | 2 |
| 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detectionabstractCommercial datasets are often large, relational, and dynamic. They contain many records of people, places, things, events and their interactions over time. Such datasets are rarely structured appropriately for knowledge discovery, and they often contain variables whose meanings change across different subsets of the data. We describe how these challenges were addressed in a collaborative analysis project undertaken by the University of Massachusetts Amherst and the National Association of Securities Dealers(NASD). We describe several methods for data pre-processing that we applied to transform a large, dynamic, and relational dataset describing nearly the entirety of the U.S. securities industry, and we show how these methods made the dataset suitable for learning statistical relational models. To better utilize social structure, we first applied known consolidation and link formation techniques to associate individuals with branch office locations. In addition, we developed an innovative technique to infer professional associations by exploiting dynamic employment histories. Finally, we applied normalization techniques to create a suitable class label that adjusts for spatial, temporal, and other heterogeneity within the data. We show how these pre-processing techniques combine to provide the necessary foundation for learning high-performing statistical models of fraudulent activity. Andrew S. Fast, Lisa Friedland, Marc E. Maier, Brian J. Taylor, David D. Jensen, Henry G. Goldberg, John Komoroske |
KDD | 6 |
| 2005 | Using relational knowledge discovery to prevent securities fraudabstractWe describe an application of relational knowledge discovery to a key regulatory mission of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD). NASD is the world's largest privatesector securities regulator, with responsibility for preventing and discovering misconduct among securities brokers. Our goal was to help focus NASD’s limited regulatory resources on the brokers who are most likely to engage in securities violations. Using statistical relational learning algorithms, we developed models that rank brokers with respect to the probability that they would commit a serious violation of securities regulations in the near future. Our models incorporate organizational relationships among brokers (e.g., past coworker), which domain experts consider important but cannot easily use otherwise. The learned models were subjected to an extensive evaluation using more than 18 months of data unseen by the model developers and comprising over two person weeks of effort by NASD staff. Model predictions were found to correlate highly with the subjective evaluations of experienced NASD examiners. Furthermore, in all performance measures, our models performed as well as or better than the handcrafted rules that are currently in use at NASD. 1. Jennifer Neville, Özgür Simsek, David D. Jensen, John Komoroske, Kelly Palmer, Henry G. Goldberg |
KDD | 6 |
| 2003 | The NASD Securities Observation, New Analysis and Regulation System (SONAR)
Henry G. Goldberg, J. Dale Kirkland, Ping Shyr, Dipak Thakker |
IAAI | 1 |
| 1995 | The FinCEN Artificial Intelligence System: Identifying Potential Money Laundering from Reports of Large Cash Transactions
Ted E. Senator, Henry G. Goldberg, Jerry Wooton, Matthew A. Cottini, A. F. Umar Khan, Christina D. Klinger, Winston M. Llamas, Michael P. Marrone, Raphael W. H. Wong |
IAAI | 2 |
| 1995 | Restructuring Databases for Knowledge Discovery by Consolidation and Link Formation
Henry G. Goldberg, Ted E. Senator |
KDD | 1 |