Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chen Zhao 0029
dblp:81/3-29
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-0070-6505ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 67% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph anomaly detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How to use Graph Data in the Wild to Help Graph Anomaly Detection? · KDD (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
transferability estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How to use Graph Data in the Wild to Help Graph Anomaly Detection? · KDD (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph anomaly detection
unsupervised graph anomaly detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How to use Graph Data in the Wild to Help Graph Anomaly Detection? · KDD (1) 2025 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | How to use Graph Data in the Wild to Help Graph Anomaly Detection?abstractIn recent years, graph anomaly detection has gained considerable attention and has found extensive applications in various domains such as social, financial, and communication networks. However, anomalies in graph-structured data present unique challenges, including label scarcity, ill-defined anomalies, and varying anomaly types, making supervised or semi-supervised methods unreliable. Researchers often adopt unsupervised approaches to address these challenges, assuming that anomalies deviate significantly from the normal data distribution. Yet, when the available data is insufficient, capturing the normal distribution accurately and comprehensively becomes difficult. To overcome this limitation, we propose to utilize external graph data (i.e., graph data in the wild) to help anomaly detection tasks. This naturally raises the question: How can we use external data to help graph anomaly detection task? To answer this question, we propose a novel framework Wild-GAD. Our framework is built upon a unified database, UniWildGraph, which comprises a large and diverse collection of graph data with broad domain coverage, ample data volume, and a unified feature space. We further develop selection criteria based on representativity and diversity to identify the most suitable external data for each anomaly detection task. Extensive experiments on six real-world test datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of Wild-GAD. Compared to the baseline methods, our framework has an average 18% AUCROC and 32% AUCPR improvement over the best-competing methods. Jiarong Xu, Chen Zhao 0029, Jiaan Wang, Carl Yang 0001, Chunping Wang 0001, Yang Yang 0009 |
KDD (1) | 3 |