Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cregg K. Cowan

dblp:81/3562 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
3D vision · 53% Robot navigation and mapping · 30% Image recognition and object detection · 14%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › sensor planning
sensor placement
0.031989
Determining the camera and light source location for a visual task · ICRA 1989
Automatic Sensor Placement from Vision Task Requirements · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988
Model-based synthesis of sensor location · ICRA 1988
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding
0.011992
Understanding Object Configurations using Range Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1992
Computer vision › 3D vision › spatial understanding
occlusion analysis
0.011988
Automatic Sensor Placement from Vision Task Requirements · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988
Computer vision › 3D vision
visual localization
0.011988
Model-based synthesis of sensor location · ICRA 1988
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.011986
Edge chain analysis for object verification · ICRA 1986
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
object verification
0.011986
Edge chain analysis for object verification · ICRA 1986
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric constraints
0.021989
Determining the camera and light source location for a visual task · ICRA 1989
Model-based synthesis of sensor location · ICRA 1988
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry
visibility constraints
0.021989
Determining the camera and light source location for a visual task · ICRA 1989
Model-based synthesis of sensor location · ICRA 1988
Computer vision › 3D vision › range sensing
range image analysis
0.011992
Understanding Object Configurations using Range Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1992
Computational geometry › geometric modeling and processing
geometric constraint solving
0.011988
Automatic Sensor Placement from Vision Task Requirements · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
edge detection
0.011986
Edge chain analysis for object verification · ICRA 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

geometric constraint solving · 0.0resolution and focus modeling · 0.0geometric constraint computation · 0.0occlusion reasoning · 0.0junction analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Understanding Object Configurations using Range Images
abstract
The authors describe techniques that generate multiple interpretations from dense range images of piles of unknown objects and methods that use physical law, such as object stability, to rank the interpretations. Each of the interpretations completely accounts for the observed range data, but the interpretations differ in the ways visible portions of objects are extended into the occluded portions of the scene. Experiments with 100 range images indicate that the techniques are fairly robust when the scenes consist of shapes that are approximately prismatic or cylindrical. These techniques are based on novel approaches in several key areas, including explicit use of sensor geometry, generic shape models to synthesize scene descriptions, spatial-reasoning techniques that incorporate knowledge about the laws of physics, direct estimation of the physical properties of the objects in the scene, and detection and refinement of descriptions of approximately planar or cylindrical surfaces.>
Prasanna G. Mulgaonkar, Cregg K. Cowan, Jeff L. DeCurtins
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1989 Determining the camera and light source location for a visual task
abstract
Techniques for calculating the three-dimensional region of acceptable locations for vision sensors and light sources are discussed. An integrated method to position both a camera and a light source based on the requirements of a given vision task is described. The method also selects the appropriate lens aperture. The proposed techniques require only a small amount of computation (approximately 1 minute of elapsed time on a time-shared VAX 8600). The proposed approach is illustrated with an example object and experimental results are described for that object.>
Cregg K. Cowan, Aviv Bergman
ICRA1
1988 Model-based synthesis of sensor location
abstract
A system that automatically generates the possible camera locations for observing an object is described. The approach, which uses models of the object and the camera, is based on meeting the requirements that the spatial resolution be above a minimum value, all surface points be in focus, all surfaces lie within the sensor field-of-view, and no surface points be occluded. Each sensing requirement is converted into a geometric constraint on the sensor location, from which the three-dimensional region of viewpoints that satisfies that constraint is computed. The intersection of these regions is the space where a sensor may be located.>
Cregg K. Cowan
ICRA1
1988 Automatic Sensor Placement from Vision Task Requirements
abstract
The problem of automatically generating the possible camera locations for observing an object is defined, and an approach to its solution is presented. The approach, which uses models of the object and the camera, is based on meeting the requirements that: the spatial resolution be above a minimum value, all surface points be in focus, all surfaces lie within the sensor field of view and no surface points be occluded. The approach converts each sensing requirement into a geometric constraint on the sensor location, from which the three-dimensional region of viewpoints that satisfies that constraint is computed. The intersection of these regions is the space where a sensor may be located. The extension of this approach to laser-scanner range sensors is also described. Examples illustrate the resolution, focus, and field-of-view constraints for two vision tasks.>
Cregg K. Cowan, Peter Kovesi
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1986 Edge chain analysis for object verification
abstract
A technique for verifying an object hypothesis by comparing hypothesized edge patterns to detected edge patterns is presented. Positive evidence for a hypothesis is identified as those portions of the model edges that are found in the image, either as geometrical features (such as straight lines or circular arcs} or as linked edges of arbitrary shape. Occluded portions of a model edge are detected by analyzing junctions of image and model edge chains. Negative evidence is identified as those portions of the model edges that are not found and are not occluded. We describe the types of junctions that can occur between image and model edges and discuss a technique for identifying occluded regions based on these junctions. Preliminary results of these techniques are also presented.
Cregg K. Cowan, Robert C. Bolles, M. J. Hannah, James A. Herson
ICRA1