Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Paul H. Bardell

dblp:81/3902 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
16ranked-venue papers
11as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 16 · 11 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers
Electronic design automation · 91% Parallel and multicore computing · 9%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.051992
Calculating the effects of linear dependencies in m-sequences used as test stimuli · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992
Partitioning of polynomial tasks: test generation, an example · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991
Pseudorandom Arrays for Built-In Tests · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.021992
Calculating the effects of linear dependencies in m-sequences used as test stimuli · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992
Partitioning of polynomial tasks: test generation, an example · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault coverage
0.021992
Calculating the effects of linear dependencies in m-sequences used as test stimuli · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1992
Random Pattern Testability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1984
Parallel and multicore computing
task partitioning
0.011991
Partitioning of polynomial tasks: test generation, an example · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault detection
0.021984
Random Pattern Testability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1984
On Random Pattern Test Length · IEEE Trans. Computers 1984
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › design for testability
built-in self-test
0.031986
Pseudorandom Arrays for Built-In Tests · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986
Random Pattern Testability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1984
On Random Pattern Test Length · IEEE Trans. Computers 1984
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › test generation › random test generation
pseudorandom test pattern generation
0.011986
Pseudorandom Arrays for Built-In Tests · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault detection
multiple fault detection
0.011984
On Random Pattern Test Length · IEEE Trans. Computers 1984
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › testability analysis
random pattern testability
0.011984
Random Pattern Testability · IEEE Trans. Computers 1984
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
random testing
0.011984
On Random Pattern Test Length · IEEE Trans. Computers 1984

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear feedback shift register · 0.0m-sequences · 0.0execution time modeling · 0.0complexity analysis · 0.0analytical fault coverage computation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Discrete logarithms a parallel pseudorandom pattern generator analysis method
Paul H. Bardell
J. Electron. Test.1
1992 Primitive polynomials of degree 301 through 500
Paul H. Bardell
J. Electron. Test.1
1992 Calculating the effects of linear dependencies in m-sequences used as test stimuli
abstract
When pseudorandom patterns generated by a linear feedback shift register (LFSR) are used as test stimuli, there is always a concern about the linear dependencies within the sequence of patterns. It is possible for these linear dependencies to preclude a specific test pattern from being present in the sequence of applied patterns. These dependencies and ways to calculate their effects on a particular test are discussed, with the goal of developing the means of analyzing a digital circuit which is connected to a source of pseudorandom patterns to determine whether or not linear dependencies are encountered by a particular connection.>
Paul H. Bardell
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
1991 Production Experience with Built-In Self-Test in the IBM ES/9000 System
abstract
This paper describes the performance of the Self-Test System used in the production of circuit modules for the new line of mainframes, the ES/9000 series. The system supports pseudorandom patterns generated and applied in a self-test mode from within the module, as well as control and pseudorandom stimuli and response compression through the IjO pins. Simulation-based diagnostics are used to generate repair actions to specific micro-nets, with an associated confidence level. Modules (containing roughly 500,000 gates) are being verified in under 3 minutes, with diagnosis of failing modules resulting in the isolation of a fault with 5 minutes of on-line time, followed by 11.7 minutes of off-line analysis.
Paul H. Bardell, Michael J. Lapointe
ITC1
1991 Partitioning of polynomial tasks: test generation, an example
abstract
The circumstances under which a partitioning of a task with a polynomial complexity will result in an overall reduction of its execution time are analyzed. It is assumed that the task executor is sequential in nature, namely it can execute only one task at a time. Since partitioning of a task into smaller subtasks will, most probably, result in subtask overlap, there is a risk that a given partitioning scheme will yield an increase in its overall execution time. Formulas are derived to test the effectiveness of any proposed partitioning scheme. In the case of multiple partitioning options, the best one can be easily obtained. One of the possible tasks that this analysis is applicable to is the test generation of digital circuits with a uniprocessor.>
Jacob Savir, Paul H. Bardell
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2
1990 Analysis of cellular automata used as pseudorandom pattern generators
abstract
The consequences of the similarity transformation between the transition matrix of a linear cellular automaton (CA) and that of a linear feedback shift register (LFSR) are explored. It is shown that the bit sequence from a stage of a CA is identical to that from the LFSR found by the similarity transformation. The concept of discrete algorithms of a binary polynomial is introduced and used with an operational calculus to calculate the phase shift between the bit sequences emitted by different stages of a linear CA. The simulation of hybrid 90/150 CA done during the course of this work leads to some conjectures about the realizability of cellular automata exhibiting maximum length sequences with null and cyclic boundary conditions.>
Paul H. Bardell
ITC1
1990 Design considerations for Parallel pseudoRandom Pattern Generators
Paul H. Bardell
J. Electron. Test.1
1989 Calculating the Effects of Linear Dependencies in m-Sequences Used as Test Stimuli
abstract
When pseudorandom patterns generated by a linear feedback shift register (LFSR) are used as test stimuli, there is always a concern about the linear dependencies within the sequence of patterns. It is possible for these linear dependencies to prevent a specific test pattern from being present in the sequence of applied patterns. These dependencies and ways to calculate their effects on a particular test are discussed. Using the analysis procedures outlined, it is possible to construct the sampling polynomial that describes the connection between a fault under test and the STUMPS structure. This sampling polynomial can then be analyzed to determine if the connection contains any linear dependencies. If a linear dependency is present in the connection, and if it prevents a required test from being presented to the fault under test, the connections between the fault under test and the STUMPS structure must be changed.>
Paul H. Bardell
ITC1
1986 Pseudorandom Arrays for Built-In Tests
abstract
Parallel pseudorandom sequences for use in built-in test are discussed. The two-dimensional nature of these sequences-makes it natural to consider the resulting binary arrays. Some of the desired properties of such arrays are discussed, as well as some of the problems. Generators for such arrays are described. A conventional LFSR with parallel output is shown to be a poor choice for such a generator. Several compact generators are described, which are shown to be compromises between complexity and varying degrees of implementation of the desired properties in the resulting sequences. One of the compact generators produces sequences which have the desired properties for built-in tests.
Paul H. Bardell, William H. McAnney
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1985 Self-Test of Random Access Memories
Paul H. Bardell, William H. McAnney
ITC1
1984 Parallel Pseudorandom Sequences for Built-In Test
Paul H. Bardell, William H. McAnney
ITC1
1984 Random Testing for Stuck-At Storage Cells in an Embedded Memory
William H. McAnney, Paul H. Bardell, V. P. Gupta
ITC2
1984 On Random Pattern Test Length
abstract
The testing of large logic networks with random patterns is examined. Work by previous workers for single faults is extended to a class of multiple fault situations. Not only is the problem of fault detection in the presence of nonmasking multiple faults treated, but the question of distinguishing between them is also examined. It is shown that a test that merely exposes each fault has a high probability of distinguishing between the faults. The relationships between quality, diagnostic resolution, and random pattern test length are developed. The results have application to self-test schemes that use random patterns as stimuli.
Jacob Savir, Paul H. Bardell
IEEE Trans. Computers2
1984 Random Pattern Testability
abstract
A major problem in self testing with random inputs is verification of the test quality, i.e., the computation of the fault coverage. The brute-force approach of using full-fault simulation does not seem attractive because of the logic structure volume, and the CPU time encountered. A new approach is therefore necessary. This paper describes a new analytical method of computing the fault coverage that is fast compared with simulation. If the fault coverage falls below a certain threshold, it is possible to identify the ``random-pattern-resistant'' faults, modify the logic to make them easy to detect, and thus, increase the fault coverage of the random test.
Jacob Savir, Gary S. Ditlow, Paul H. Bardell
IEEE Trans. Computers3
1983 On Random Pattern Test Length
Jacob Savir, Paul H. Bardell
ITC2
1982 Self-Testing of Multichip Logic Modules
Paul H. Bardell, William H. McAnney
ITC1