Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aeron Buchanan

dblp:81/4 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Video understanding and tracking · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
feature tracking
0.122007
Combining local and global motion models for feature point tracking · CVPR 2007
Interactive Feature Tracking using K-D Trees and Dynamic Programming · CVPR (1) 2006
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › motion analysis › motion modeling
motion model
0.112007
Combining local and global motion models for feature point tracking · CVPR 2007
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
occlusion handling
0.112006
Interactive Feature Tracking using K-D Trees and Dynamic Programming · CVPR (1) 2006
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking › appearance-based tracking
template tracking
0.112006
Interactive Feature Tracking using K-D Trees and Dynamic Programming · CVPR (1) 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rank-constrained tracking · 0.1probabilistic model · 0.1KLT tracker · 0.1k-d tree · 0.1image preprocessing · 0.1dynamic programming · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Combining local and global motion models for feature point tracking
abstract
Accurate feature point tracks through long sequences are a valuable substrate for many computer vision applications, e.g. non-rigid body tracking, video segmentation, video matching, and even object recognition. Existing algorithms may be arranged along an axis indicating how global the motion model used to constrain tracks is. Local methods, such as the KLT tracker, depend on local models of feature appearance, and are easily distracted by occlusions, repeated structure, and image noise. This leads to short tracks, many of which are incorrect. Alone, these require considerable postprocessing to obtain a useful result. In restricted scenes, for example a rigid scene through which a camera is moving, such postprocessing can make use of global motion models to allow "guided matching " which yields long high-quality feature tracks. However, many scenes of interest contain multiple motions or significant non-rigid deformations which mean that guided matching cannot be applied. In this paper we propose a general amalgam of local and global models to improve tracking even in these difficult cases. By viewing rank-constrained tracking as a probabilistic model of 2D tracks rather than 3D motion, we obtain a strong, robust motion prior, derived from the global motion in the scene. The result is a simple and powerful prior whose strength is easily tuned, enabling its use in any existing tracking algorithm.
Aeron Buchanan, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon
CVPR1
2006 Interactive Feature Tracking using K-D Trees and Dynamic Programming
abstract
A new approach to template tracking is presented, incorporating three distinct contributions. Firstly, an explicit definition for a feature track is given. Secondly, the advantages of an image preprocessing stage are demonstrated and, in particular, the effectiveness of highly compressed image patch data stored in k-d trees for fast and discriminatory image patch searches. Thirdly, the k-d trees are used to generate multiple track hypotheses which are efficiently merged to give the optimal solution using dynamic programming. The explicit separation of feature detection and trajectory determination creates the basis for the novel use of k-d trees and dynamic programming. Multiple appearances and occlusion handling are seamlessly integrated into this framework. Appearance variation through the sequence is robustly handled in an iterative process. The work presented is a significant foundation for a powerful off-line feature tracking system, particularly in the context of interactive applications.
Aeron Buchanan, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon
CVPR (1)1