Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tejaswi Gowda
dblp:81/4863
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0002-0896-6526ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
boolean function representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Identification of Threshold Functions and Synthesis of Threshold Networks · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2011 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
decision diagrams |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Identification of Threshold Functions and Synthesis of Threshold Networks · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2011 |
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Identification of Threshold Functions and Synthesis of Threshold Networks · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2011 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › threshold logic synthesis
threshold function identification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Identification of Threshold Functions and Synthesis of Threshold Networks · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2011 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
threshold logic synthesis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Identification of Threshold Functions and Synthesis of Threshold Networks · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
max literal factor tree · 0.1heuristic search · 0.1binary decision diagram · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Identification of Threshold Functions and Synthesis of Threshold NetworksabstractThis paper presents a new and efficient heuristic procedure for determining whether or not a given Boolean function is a threshold function, when the Boolean function is given in the form of a decision diagram. The decision diagram based method is significantly different from earlier methods that are based on solving linear inequalities in Boolean variables that derived from truth tables. This method's success depends on the ordering of the variables in the binary decision diagram (BDD). An alternative data structure, and one that is more compact than a BDD, called a max literal factor tree (MLFT) is introduced. An MLFT is a particular type of factoring tree and was found to be more efficient than a BDD for identifying threshold functions. The threshold identification procedure is applied to the MCNC benchmark circuits to synthesize threshold gate networks. Tejaswi Gowda, Sarma B. K. Vrudhula, Niranjan Kulkarni, Krzysztof S. Berezowski |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 1 |
| 2008 | Decomposition based approach for synthesis of multi-level threshold logic circuitsabstractScaling is currently the most popular technique used to improve performance metrics of CMOS circuits. This cannot go on forever because the properties that are responsible for the functioning of MOSFETs no longer hold in nano dimensions. Recent research into nano devices has shown that nano devices can be an alternative to CMOS when scaling of CMOS becomes infeasible in the near future. This is motivating the need for stable and mature design automation techniques for threshold logic since it is the design abstraction used for most nano- devices. This paper presents a new decomposition theory that is based on the properties of threshold functions. The main contributions of this paper are: (1) A new method of algebraic factorization called the min-max factorization. (2) A decomposition theory that uses this new factorization to identify and characterize threshold functions. (3) A new threshold logic synthesis methodology that uses the decomposition theory. This synthesis methodology produces circuits that are better than the previous state of art (27% better gate count and comparable circuit depth). Tejaswi Gowda, Sarma B. K. Vrudhula |
ASP-DAC | 1 |
| 2007 | Combinational equivalence checking for threshold logic circuitsabstractThreshold logic is gaining prominence as an alternative to Boolean logic. The main reason for this trend is the availability of devices that implement these circuits efficiently (current mode, differential mode circuits), as well as the promise they hold for the future nanoalldevices (RTDs, SETs, QCAs and other nano devices). This has generated renewed interest in the design automation community to design efficient CAD tools for threshold logic. Recently a lot of work has been done to synthesize threshold logic circuits. So far there has been no efficient method to verify the synthesized circuits. In this work we address the problem of combinational equivalence checking for threshold circuits. We propose a new algorithm, to obtain compact functional representation of threshold elements. We give the proof of correctness, and analyze its runtime complexity. We use this polynomial time algorithm to develop a new methodology to verify threshold circuits. We report the result of our experiments, comparing the proposed methodology to the naive approach. We get up to 189X improvement in the run time (23X on average), and could verify circuits that the naive approach could not. Tejaswi Gowda, Sarma B. K. Vrudhula, Goran Konjevod |
ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI | 1 |