Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ross A. Towle

dblp:81/5398 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › parallelizing compiler
dependence analysis
0.011979
Time and Parallel Processor Bounds for Fortran-Like Loops · IEEE Trans. Computers 1979
Parallel and multicore computing › parallelization strategies › loop parallelism
parallel loop execution
0.011979
Time and Parallel Processor Bounds for Fortran-Like Loops · IEEE Trans. Computers 1979
Compilers and program optimization
loop transformation
0.011979
Time and Parallel Processor Bounds for Fortran-Like Loops · IEEE Trans. Computers 1979
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1993 Compiling for the Cydra
James C. Dehnert, Ross A. Towle
J. Supercomput.2
1979 Time and Parallel Processor Bounds for Fortran-Like Loops
abstract
The main goal of this paper is to show that a large number of processors can be used effectively to speed up simple Fortran-like loops consisting of assignment statements. A practical method is given by which one can check whether or not a statement is dependent upon another. The dependence structure of the whole loop may be of different types. For each type, a set of time and processor upper bounds is given. We also show how a loop can sometimes be transformed to change its dependence structure. Finally, we give a result on the possible splitting up of a given recurrence system into a number of smaller subsystems. These results can be used to modify and sometimes improve the bounds for the loops as demanded by special circumstances.
Utpal Banerjee, Shyh-Ching Chen, David J. Kuck, Ross A. Towle
IEEE Trans. Computers4