Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David J. Cutler

dblp:81/545 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6394-6731ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene co-expression analysis
differential co-expression analysis
0.912025
A powerful framework for differential co-expression analysis of general risk factors · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.912025
A powerful framework for differential co-expression analysis of general risk factors · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.722023
POIROT: a powerful test for parent-of-origin effects in unrelated samples leveraging multiple phenotypes · Bioinform. 2023
Discrepancies in dbSNP confirmation rates and allele frequency distributions from varying genotyping error rates and patterns · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study
0.712023
POIROT: a powerful test for parent-of-origin effects in unrelated samples leveraging multiple phenotypes · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genome-wide association study
multi-trait association testing
0.712023
POIROT: a powerful test for parent-of-origin effects in unrelated samples leveraging multiple phenotypes · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genotype-phenotype analysis
pleiotropy analysis
0.712023
POIROT: a powerful test for parent-of-origin effects in unrelated samples leveraging multiple phenotypes · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.312025
A powerful framework for differential co-expression analysis of general risk factors · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
population genetics
0.012004
Discrepancies in dbSNP confirmation rates and allele frequency distributions from varying genotyping error rates and patterns · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kernel methods · 0.9correlation pattern analysis · 0.9robust omnibus test · 0.7phenotypic covariance comparison · 0.7mathematical models · 0.0false positive and false negative rate estimation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A powerful framework for differential co-expression analysis of general risk factors
abstract
MOTIVATION: Differential co-expression analysis (DCA) aims to identify genes in a pathway whose shared expression depends on a risk factor. While DCA provides insights into the biological activity of diseases, existing methods are limited to categorical risk factors and/or suffer from bias due to batch and variance-specific effects. We propose a new framework, Kernel-based DCA (KDCA), that harnesses correlation patterns between genes in a pathway to detect differential co-expression arising from general (i.e. continuous, discrete, or categorical) risk factors. RESULTS: Using various simulated pathway architectures, we find that KDCA accounts for common sources of bias to control the type I error rate while substantially increasing the power compared to the standard eigengene approach. We then applied KDCA to The Cancer Genome Atlas thyroid data set and found several differentially co-expressed pathways by age of diagnosis and BRAF mutation status that were undetected by the eigengene method. Collectively, our results demonstrate that KDCA is a powerful testing framework that expands DCA applications in expression studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: KDCA is publicly available in the R package kdca. The package can be downloaded at https://github.com/ajbass/kdca.
Andrew J. Bass, David J. Cutler, Michael P. Epstein
Bioinform.2
2023 POIROT: a powerful test for parent-of-origin effects in unrelated samples leveraging multiple phenotypes
abstract
MOTIVATION: There is widespread interest in identifying genetic variants that exhibit parent-of-origin effects (POEs) wherein the effect of an allele on phenotype expression depends on its parental origin. POEs can arise from different phenomena including genomic imprinting and have been documented for many complex traits. Traditional tests for POEs require family data to determine parental origins of transmitted alleles. As most genome-wide association studies (GWAS) sample unrelated individuals (where allelic parental origin is unknown), the study of POEs in such datasets requires sophisticated statistical methods that exploit genetic patterns we anticipate observing when POEs exist. We propose a method to improve discovery of POE variants in large-scale GWAS samples that leverages potential pleiotropy among multiple correlated traits often collected in such studies. Our method compares the phenotypic covariance matrix of heterozygotes to homozygotes based on a Robust Omnibus Test. We refer to our method as the Parent of Origin Inference using Robust Omnibus Test (POIROT) of multiple quantitative traits. RESULTS: Through simulation studies, we compared POIROT to a competing univariate variance-based method which considers separate analysis of each phenotype. We observed POIROT to be well-calibrated with improved power to detect POEs compared to univariate methods. POIROT is robust to non-normality of phenotypes and can adjust for population stratification and other confounders. Finally, we applied POIROT to GWAS data from the UK Biobank using BMI and two cholesterol phenotypes. We identified 338 genome-wide significant loci for follow-up investigation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code for this method is available at https://github.com/staylorhead/POIROT-POE.
S. Taylor Head, Elizabeth J. Leslie, David J. Cutler, Michael P. Epstein
Bioinform.3
2017 MPD: multiplex primer design for next-generation targeted sequencing
abstract
BACKGROUND: Targeted resequencing offers a cost-effective alternative to whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing when investigating regions known to be associated with a trait or disease. There are a number of approaches to targeted resequencing, including microfluidic PCR amplification, which may be enhanced by multiplex PCR. Currently, there is no open-source software that can design next-generation multiplex PCR experiments that ensures primers are unique at a genome-level and efficiently pools compatible primers. RESULTS: We present MPD, a software package that automates the design of multiplex PCR primers for next-generation sequencing. The core of MPD is implemented in C for speed and uses a hashed genome to ensure primer uniqueness, avoids placing primers over sites of known variation, and efficiently pools compatible primers. A JavaScript web application ( http://multiplexprimer.io ) utilizing the MPD Perl package provides a convenient platform for users to make designs. Using a realistic set of genes identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), we achieve 90% coverage of all exonic regions using stringent design criteria. Using the first 47 primer pools for wet-lab validation, we sequenced ~25Kb at 99.7% completeness with a mean coverage of 300X among 313 samples simultaneously and identified 224 variants. The number and nature of variants we observe are consistent with high quality sequencing. CONCLUSIONS: MPD can successfully design multiplex PCR experiments suitable for next-generation sequencing, and simplifies retooling targeted resequencing pipelines to focus on new targets as new genetic evidence emerges.
Thomas S. Wingo, Alex Kotlar, David J. Cutler
BMC Bioinform.3
2010 SeqAnt: A web service to rapidly identify and annotate DNA sequence variations
abstract
BACKGROUND: The enormous throughput and low cost of second-generation sequencing platforms now allow research and clinical geneticists to routinely perform single experiments that identify tens of thousands to millions of variant sites. Existing methods to annotate variant sites using information from publicly available databases via web browsers are too slow to be useful for the large sequencing datasets being routinely generated by geneticists. Because sequence annotation of variant sites is required before functional characterization can proceed, the lack of a high-throughput pipeline to efficiently annotate variant sites can act as a significant bottleneck in genetics research. RESULTS: SeqAnt (Sequence Annotator) is an open source web service and software package that rapidly annotates DNA sequence variants and identifies recessive or compound heterozygous loci in human, mouse, fly, and worm genome sequencing experiments. Variants are characterized with respect to their functional type, frequency, and evolutionary conservation. Annotated variants can be viewed on a web browser, downloaded in a tab-delimited text file, or directly uploaded in a BED format to the UCSC genome browser. To demonstrate the speed of SeqAnt, we annotated a series of publicly available datasets that ranged in size from 37 to 3,439,107 variant sites. The total time to completely annotate these data completely ranged from 0.17 seconds to 28 minutes 49.8 seconds. CONCLUSION: SeqAnt is an open source web service and software package that overcomes a critical bottleneck facing research and clinical geneticists using second-generation sequencing platforms. SeqAnt will prove especially useful for those investigators who lack dedicated bioinformatics personnel or infrastructure in their laboratories.
Amol Carl Shetty, Prashanth Athri, Kajari Mondal, Vanessa L. Horner, Karyn Meltz Steinberg, Viren Patel, Tamara Caspary, David J. Cutler, Michael E. Zwick
BMC Bioinform.8
2004 Discrepancies in dbSNP confirmation rates and allele frequency distributions from varying genotyping error rates and patterns
abstract
SUMMARY: Three recent publications have examined the quality and completeness of public database single nucleotide polymorphism (dbSNP) and have come to dramatically different conclusions regarding dbSNPs false positive rate and the proportion of dbSNPs that are expected to be common. These studies employed different genotyping technologies and different protocols in determining minimum acceptable genotyping quality thresholds. Because heterozygous sites typically have lower quality scores than homozygous sites, a higher minimum quality threshold reduces the number of false positive SNPs, but yields fewer heterozygotes and leads to fewer confirmed SNPs. To account for the different confirmation rates and distributions of minor allele frequencies, we propose that the three confirmation studies have different false positive and false negative rates. We developed a mathematical model to predict SNP confirmation rates and the apparent distribution of minor allele frequencies under user-specified false positive and false negative rates. We applied this model to the three published studies and to our own resequencing effort. We conclude that the dbSNP false positive rate is approximately 15-17% and that the reported confirmation studies have vastly different genotyping error rates and patterns.
Adele A. Mitchell, Michael E. Zwick, Aravinda Chakravarti, David J. Cutler
Bioinform.4