Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

J. Richard Kane

dblp:81/6303 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1976
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
automated testing
0.011976
ATLAS - An Automated Software Testing System · ICSE 1976
Software testing
fault detection
0.011975
Concurrent Software Fault Detection · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975
Software testing
test execution
0.011976
ATLAS - An Automated Software Testing System · ICSE 1976

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0graph theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1976 ATLAS - An Automated Software Testing System
W. H. Jessop, J. Richard Kane, J. M. Scanlon
ICSE2
1975 Concurrent Software Fault Detection
abstract
A graph theoretic model for software systems is presented which permits a system to be characterized by its set of allowable execution sequences. It is shown how a system can be structured so that every execution sequence affected by a control fault is obviously in error, i.e., not in the allowable set defined by the system model. Faults are detected by monitoring the execution sequence of every transaction processed by the system and comparing its execution sequence to the set of allowable sequences. Algorithms are presented both for structuring a system so that all faults can be detected and for fault detection concurrent with system operation. Simulation results are presented which support the theoretical development of this paper.
J. Richard Kane, Stephen S. Yau
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1