Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Michel Dominici

dblp:81/7042 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0001-7208-6817ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
force control
0.322014
Model predictive control architectures with force feedback for robotic-assisted beating heart surgery · ICRA 2014
Heart motion compensation for robotic-assisted surgery predictive approach vs. active observer · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.322014
Model predictive control architectures with force feedback for robotic-assisted beating heart surgery · ICRA 2014
Heart motion compensation for robotic-assisted surgery predictive approach vs. active observer · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.212014
Model predictive control architectures with force feedback for robotic-assisted beating heart surgery · ICRA 2014
Medical and health informatics › surgical robotics
beating heart surgery
0.122014
Model predictive control architectures with force feedback for robotic-assisted beating heart surgery · ICRA 2014
Heart motion compensation for robotic-assisted surgery predictive approach vs. active observer · ICRA 2011
Medical and health informatics › surgical robotics
robot-assisted surgery
0.122014
Model predictive control architectures with force feedback for robotic-assisted beating heart surgery · ICRA 2014
Heart motion compensation for robotic-assisted surgery predictive approach vs. active observer · ICRA 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kalman active observer · 0.4cascade control · 0.4model-reference adaptive control · 0.3model reference adaptive control · 0.3stochastic active observer · 0.2linear predictive control · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Model predictive control architectures with force feedback for robotic-assisted beating heart surgery
abstract
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers considerable advantages for patients, lowering infection risks, and reducing trauma and convalescence times. Dedicated surgical robots significantly improve surgeon's skills especially for tasks requiring high precision such as lead placement and suturing. However, these robotic setups do not allow yet beating heart surgery with motion compensation functionalities. This paper tackles autonomous heart motion compensation with force feedback. We propose a cascade model predictive control (MPC) architecture with a Kalman Active Observer (AOB) in the loop, and compare it with the classical MPC approach. The cascade MPC-AOB control architecture has two loops. The inner one performs model-reference adaptive control, guaranteeing a desired force tracking dynamics. The outer one generates control actions to compensate physiological motions. Both MPC-based architectures are analyzed and experimentally evaluated. Two robots are used. A lightweight 4-DoF surgical robot generates desired surgical forces and a 3-DoF robot equipped with an ex vivo heart at the end-effector reproduces realistic heart motions.
Michel Dominici, Rui Pedro Duarte Cortesão
ICRA1
2011 Heart motion compensation for robotic-assisted surgery predictive approach vs. active observer
abstract
In beating-heart surgeries, two natural disturbances affect surgeon's skills: respiration and heartbeats. Heart motions are too dynamic to be manually compensated, therefore robotic-assisted surgery has the potential to improve surgical tasks, especially those requiring high precision such as needle insertion or suturing. In our approach only force data are used to autonomously compensate physiological motions. Two force control architectures are confronted and experimentally compared, using a lightweight 7 DOF WAM arm. One is based on linear predictive control, which uses a mathematical model to predict the system behavior. The other one is based on model reference adaptive control with stochastic active observers.
Michel Dominici, Rui Pedro Duarte Cortesão, Cristóvão D. Sousa
ICRA1
2009 Compensation for 3D physiological motion in robotic-assisted surgery using a predictive force controller. Experimental results
abstract
This paper presents a predictive force control approach to compensate for the physiological motion induced by both respiratory and heart beating motions during cardiac surgery. It focuses on the design and implementation of the control algorithm in the context of robotized minimally invasive surgery. The controller is based on a linear predictive control loop using the force information applied on the heart by the instrument. Experimental evaluation highlights the performance of the algorithm for compensating 3D physiological motion.
Michel Dominici, Philippe Poignet, Rui Pedro Duarte Cortesão, Etienne Dombre, Olivier Tempier
IROS1
2008 Compensation of physiological motion using linear predictive force control
abstract
This paper proposes a new approach to compensate the physiological motion, induced by respiration and heart beating, for robotized minimally invasive cardiac surgery. The control algorithm, based on a linear predictive control, uses the effort information applied on the heart by the instrument.
Michel Dominici, Philippe Poignet, Etienne Dombre
IROS1